Is it good?

File: 1489534493723.jpg (25KB, 400x350px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 400x350px

>>87418582
Worth the time if you here asking faggot.

>>87418582

It's alright for it's time, but feels unfinished, it's basically just book 1 plus portions of book 2, little portions.

It's an oddity. Worth seeing, but maybe not "good".

>>87418746
>feels unfinished
Understatement if ever there was one. It just awkwardly ends.

Wizards is better

Did Ralph Bakshi make a single good animation movie?
They all seem unfinished and rushed.

And what about his seemingly everlasting love for brown colours?

>>87418798
dis

>>87418582

i liked it a lot as a kid, and the hobbit/return of the king cartoons.

but like people said it feels unfinished, though i'll add that because of that somehow it really captured my imagination as a kid. I knew there was more to this world more to these stories i felt i missed the middle and with the animation style switching between the bakshi and rankin bass it didnt even flow very well narrative wise. But there was something in that disjointedness that made me wanting more, it felt like it was a real story that had actually happened long long ago and i was only getting pieces of it.

eventually i read the hobbit and lotr's around the time the live action movies came out and i had a full picture of the story at that point but even then since so much of the books and films have an underlying story you'd only get if you read the silmarillion (which i had not yet done) that imaginative wonder feeling i had about what else there was going on in this world stayed with me there as well.

i guess what im getting at is that the movie is disjointed and unfinished but i actually think that added to my own personal enjoyment of middle earth, i dont know if that would hold up today but having to dig to get the full picture was part of what made Tolkien work exciting and imaginative, for myself anyway.

>>87418746
This. It's Part 1 and he never got to do Part 2. It's interesting technically.