>Unfortunately, Buck’s next series has also been met by overwhelmingly negative criticism. While only a few reviews are currently out for Inhumans — the first two episodes from which will be released in IMAX — they’ve all been highly critical.
>IGN, who genuinely favour superhero shows, awarded Inhumans 4.0 out of 10, calling the show “bad from top to bottom.”
>“Try as it might, the show does not live up to the Marvel brand,” their reviewer concluded. “It is most definitely not worth seeing in IMAX, and I wouldn’t recommend catching it on TV either.”
>Digital Spy have been equally critical, calling Inhumans the “weakest entry in the Marvel Cinematic Universe to date,” adding:” A severe throwback to the mostly underwhelming comic book adaptations of the pre-Iron Man age, this looks to be a serious misstep, one that'll hopefully provoke the House of M to take a step back and reevaluate their creative strategy.”
>Another low score came from Fandom, awarding only 1.0 out of five, writing: “In concentrating on making a splash with its IMAX premiere, it refuses to push boundaries in other, more important areas. Sadly, that means a lacklustre beginning to a series that was meant to wow.”
>Newsarama shared a similar sentiment (giving the first episode 4/10) while Vox, who decided not to outright review, strongly pointed potentially interested IMAx goers to spend their money on seeing something else.
JUST
>>87262786
what is with the shape of that read head bitches head
I thought this was a porn parody
>>87262897
bad photoshop job
Either this show isn't pushing diversity, or it isn't pushing diversity enough
>>87262897
Her hair (and power) gets cut off less than 30 mins into ep 1.
The huge dog Lockjaw is a put into stasis by the end of ep 1.
No budget for this show.
>>87263170
Lol
You serious?
>>87262897
Making a masonic hand sign, so probably a dude.
>>87262786
Is it at least entertaining in the same way as a car crash? I might have to give it a watch.
>>87262897
White yakub. Cultural appropriation