Why do these rankings differ so much? Which one do you trust?

RT is trash and everybody who judges movies by their RT rating should have their eyes gouged out.

The one I trust the least is RT. Movie can have like 90% with just 5.5 rating, which is BS. Also they are very biased.
For example movies STRICTLY focused on gore-effects are low rated by poor acting. BUT Who cares at acting if all actors need in them is to bet their character slashed? Never really seen any good words about how guresome or disgusting actual gore it.
Also mindless blockbusters railed by lack of dept... seriously, who the fuck needs any deep intake on a boom-boom cheesy flicks?

Metacritics got somehow better realiblity, not much.

IMDB is rated by viewers, so they are obviously fanboys/biased people.

I wach movies I'm intrested in, despite ratings and reviews they get. Then after seeing I can rate them myself.

>>87218096
>I watch movies I'm interested in, despite ratings and reviews they get.

thats interesting, because I usually find movies I REALLY loved having 6.7 rating (Fear and Loathing in LV) on imdb