How come there's no tv shows or movies about female losers?
>>87176002
who would want to see that?
>>87176002
Welcome to the dollhouse?
Crazy Ex-Girlfriend
Kimmy Schmidt
Granted, they're attractive, dont @ me, but they're supposed to be weird/losers/outcasts, etc
>>87176002
Because women and jews control the media you cuck liberal conservacuck faggot kike nigger dyke >>>/pol/-browsing BLACKED >>>/trash/posting cunnyposting john oliver watching redditor centrist >>>/v/irgin sandnigger ooga booga meanie TGWTG watching tumblr-browsing son of a bitch
>>87176123
This but unironically.
>>87176002
Women cannot lose in life. There are literally no homeless women, or at least maybe one under one thousand homeless men and why is that? Because regardless how much of a fuck up the woman is, she will always find an Beta Provider, men have not that much luck.
>>87176055
>>87176069
These.
How many female losers are there? Well, technically 90% of women but not to the definition of loser we usually think. It's really tough for a women to be a loser when they're lives are so easy and the standards we hold them to are so low.
To be a female loser you have to REALLY REALLY fuck up. Like be a colossal fuck up.
>>87176002
because audiences can only suspend their disbelief for so much
idk but lets popularize the idea that outtie pussies shouldnt breed
>>87177162
EVERY SINGLE FEMALE PHYSICAL DEFECT CAN BE CORRECTED, THEY HAVE THE HIGHER GROUND IN THAT REGARD FOREVER