(((British Telivision)))

>>87086081
>that like/dislike ratio
Feels pretty good

>>87086081
Looks like kino, to be fair.

>>87086539
it's funny because they're gonna keep making this shit no matter how many online tantrums you guys throw

>>87086747
They'll just make disliking a video illegal because wrongthink bad for you.

>>87086769
>he actually believes this shit
it's more that no one takes you faggots seriously until you chimp out in public
downvotes on a youtube video don't do shit

>>87086081
It's not unthinkable that a single black african could be recruited from the Roman colonies in African.

Plus, looks like he gets his head chopped off, so why isn't /pol/ screaming DEUS VULT instead?

File: 1468576555985.jpg (82KB, 504x350px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 504x350px

>>87086747
>Take revisionist nonsense lying down
>lol what a cuck
>Oppose revisionist nonsense with the only platform available to you
>lol what a baby, just accept it

>>87086081
>telivision
Alt-right education, everyone.

File: Bobbies.png (133KB, 621x762px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 621x762px

>>87086856
Is that why 90% of online British news sites have closed their comments sections, BBC included. Is that why the police patrol social media for 'offensive' posts. No discussion allowed might lead to wrongthink and pedophile hate. Now listen to your Imam say prayers.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RFqV_sp0z9Y

>>87086081
>Telivision

>>87086747
>they're gonna keep making this shit no matter how many online tantrums you guys throw
Well yea, it's a socialist system where the consumer's opinion doesn't matter on the least bit because they are forced to pay for it. The government will continue to take your money and make anti-(You) programming. Don't you just love socialism. Hey at least I don't have to pay for healthcare. I get shitty healthcare for free!

>>87086880
>getting this steamed over fiction
get your testosterone levels checked faggot

I'll reserve judgement until I get proof the black soldier is a main character. Like >>87086869 said, there were likely SOME subsaharan africans in the roman army.

>>87086869
>dude I get my history lessons from GoT like everyone else XD
Please tell me why a sub Saharan African would be recruited into a Roman legion proper and sent to Britannia.

>>87086869
>It's not unthinkable that a single black african could be recruited from the Roman colonies in African.
It is because
1. In 43AD the Roman Legions were still made up of Roman Citizens. A Roman Citizen was generally an Italian from Italy or a descendant of such, which was different to a Peregrinus, who were the free people who lived under the empire. Any blacks in the empire would have been Peregrinus and thus not allowed to join the legions but the auxilia instead, but this man is clearly a legionary.
2. There were no black Roman colonies in this time, the south of Roman controlled Egypt had dark people living there, but they would be the thin, long faced africans we see there today.
3. This black african character is a main actor who features in all 10 episodes of the first season, he is named Vitus and is clearly supposed to be an important character, despite being a regular legionary

File: mufuggingreeks.jpg (27KB, 316x471px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 316x471px

YO HECTOR!

>>87086956
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auxilia

>>87086081
>sub Saharan legionaries
Literally never happened. Want to know what Romans actually thought of Sub Saharan Africans (Negroes)? Go read Strabo. Go read the Arab historians too. Warning: they both basically say they're all savage, cannibalistic and less than animal with zero infrastructure. Want to know why the Romans felt they had conquered "Africa" when, in reality, they'd only taken a sliver of the northern part of the continent? Because the north was literally all that mattered. The rest was such an underdeveloped shit hole that no great civilization even counted it as being part of the geopolitical world.

>>87086945
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt5932548/
10 episodes, Vitus

>>87086943
>King Henry VIII was a nigger
>you're a baby if you complain about being ethnically cleansed in your own country
What a bunch of man-babies, caring about the future of your society? What a fucking loser. Real men let thier wives fuck black men, you're obviously too insecure for that.

I'm more offended by this "wow so gritty" and "omg classic rock" style that seems to be seeping into everything being made nowadays

Can Britbongs just nuke themselves already? Pretty please?

>>87086990
>were never legionnaires
>wouldn't have been recruited from unconquered territories such as sub Saharan Africa
>would never have been sent from Africa to Birtannia
Next.

>>87086990
He said a Roman legion you dunce.

>>87086990
This doesn't say anything about niggers in the Roman army. Your side has to literally revise history just to make niggers feel like humans.

>>87087006
They said the same of the people north of the Rhine and then promptly got BLOWN THE FUCK OUT.

TEUTOBURG BEST DAY OF MY LIFE

File: 102np7t.gif (3MB, 375x250px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 375x250px

>>87087014
>thinks casting decisions to pander to minorities is genocide
>immediately starts talking about nigger dicks
I rest my case

>>87087066
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-leicestershire-38172433

lmao at all the alt-right incels losing their minds over this

>>87086081
Now that conclusive DNA evidence have shown that the ancient egyptians were related to people of the levant and not sub-saharan african in the slightest I guess they have to go after the romans instead.

>>87087123
>African links
Yes, North Africa, where berbers live, who aren't/weren't black.

>>87087086
>They said the same of the people north of the Rhine and then promptly got BLOWN THE FUCK OUT.
No, they didn't. They regarded them as barbarians (obviously since they were foreigners), but Tacitus and a number of others were also quick to relate their fierce nature, tall stature, and warlike aspect (all positive traits within Roman society). Don't confuse the term barbarian with the term savage.

>>87086990
OUCH

File: IMG_0727.jpg (113KB, 650x755px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 650x755px

>>87087099
>is defending history being re-written to get rid of white peoples
>ignores that leftists have been bringing millions and millions of brown people into white countries against the will of the people
>is ignoring that the left literally says they are doing this to replace evil, racist whitey
>is ignoring that leftists are obsessed with black cock
Why does your side fight so hard to replace white people and then turn around and mock white genocide while literally telling us that you want to replace us?

>>87087066
https://www.bbc.com/pidgin
WE WUZ LANGUAGE!

Blacks in the Roman army is total bullshit but it would help if the people agreeing with me on this didnt constantly spout NIGGER and KIKES and racism in general.

I'm not racist im just an autistic history graduate.

>>87087123
>twisting yourself into intellectual pretzels to defend the big black cock
God you people are so pathetic. Just suck a black cock and move on with your lives already. The rest of the world is laughing at you cucks. Literally the entire world is laughing at you.

Is this about GJC's expedition to Britain?

>>87087024
This Tbh. All television is garbage

>>87087099
it's a symptom of major illness which is replacement. First it's your historical figures and depictions or them to be inclusive. Then it's your people. Replacement is real

>>87087206
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint_Maurice

File: IMG_0725.jpg (306KB, 1536x2048px) Image search: [Google]

306KB, 1536x2048px

>>87087206
>i-I'm not racist i j-just like history
I get you have to say this or else the Europolice will arrest you for a hate crime while your Muslim neighbor grooms little white girls, but these people literally want to replace (You) and they don't even hide it anymore.

>>87087256
200 years later though, it is a big difference.

Though i do believe medieval artists exaggerate his darkness.

>>87087185
Not that guy but it quite literally isn't a genocide though.
And shitty television shows are not rewriting history.
And you(r women) voted for Merkele and other cucks and are now spreading their asses willfully.

Just call it collective suicide. You bunch of bitches.

>>87087265
No I'm genuinely just not a racist.


But fuck Muslims though, they're not a race.

>>87087211
>that one obsessed guy in every one of these threads

>>87087256
>There is a difference of opinion among researchers as to whether or not the story of the Theban Legion is based on historical fact, and if so, to what extent.
The guy didn't even exist. Eurofags have been revisionist cucks for centuries, it appears.

How will the alt left try and spin this one folks? Probably the same way the advocate women's rights and child protection laws while simultaneously supporting mass Muslim migration into the west.

>>87087277
>>87087265
Also its' historical authenticity is still up for debate.

File: IMG_0726.jpg (177KB, 1536x2048px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 1536x2048px

>>87087304
>we are literally replacing you because we hate white people
>not a genocide
You're right, only non-whites can be genocided. When Jews ethnically cleanse your country, it's not considered genocide.

>>87087327
They'll do what they always do, point to evidence of Roman soldiers from North Africa as proof, and when it's pointed out that north africans aren't black they'll call us racist or say its a tv show it doesn't matter.

>>87087327
if it's any comfort to you most of the academic world is pretty irritated by forcing racial narratives like the idea that black africans served in Britain in a regiment recruited in North Africa.

>>87087327
don't forget raping babies and sacrificing them to Moloch

>>87087351
Where are the concentration camps?

Anyway I find it hilarious how your every picture features a woman. You brought this on yourself.

>>87086917
might help if you didnt discuss things like a mouthbreathing neckbeard with zero social grace.

>>87086939
>The government will continue to take your money and make anti-(You) programming

Only insecure beta male alt-righters would give a shit that one TV show they don't like is paid by taxes.

>>87087419
You just attacked me personally please hand over your personal details in order for me to inform the appropriate authorities.

File: head_off.jpg (346KB, 1914x1080px) Image search: [Google]

346KB, 1914x1080px

>>87086081
Did you dimwits watch the trailer long enough to see this?

>>87086081
Looks pretty good. Dont know why a couple of frames of a black guy in a 4 min trailer is somehow reason to have an autistic fit...

>>87087593
OH THAT MAKES IT OKAY
COME ON IN TYRONE

>>87087593
finnish boy

>>87087625
>OH THAT MAKES IT OKAY
Whats the problem? Does a fictional Nubian legionnaire trigger you this much?

>>87087625
So I take it as a no then.

>>87087593
that looks like something the irate gamer would make

>>87086081

Looks pretty promising to me, but sure, let's obsess over a black actor and sperg about a fucking fictional TV show for couple of weeks.

>>87087663
I saw it. It's still irrelevant. You sound like this retarded fucking cuck >>87086869

>>87086081
White bois getting mad that the black man civilised their pink skin caveman asses

>>87087625
kek

>>87087684
Well it takes one to know one I guess.

>>87087684
>an autist getting triggered over a single black legionnaire is calling non-assburgians "cuck".

You do realise that youre a genetic cuck right?

File: 1501460483748.jpg (7KB, 209x279px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 209x279px

>the legions that caesar took to britain were raised in northern italy and cisalpine gaul, plus some germanic cavalry
>somehow a wild nigger
>lorica segmentata in 53BC

>>87087674
You're acting like we're the ones who are overly politically motivated for having a problem, when you know they 100% cast this actor for political reasons.

We wouldn't have all these screaming alt-righters if the government introduced court appointed girlfriends.

Surely that would be a leftist policy they could get behind.

>>87086081
He's an auxiliary tho

>>87087803
No, they put him in because they want to represent the black people in our society today and that is it. They don't give a fuck about historical accuracy.

The black guy is in there for 1 second what the fuck

And literally everyone else is white

It's Battlefield 1 all over again.

>>87086869
its like they do with WWII, because 0,000001% may have been black suddenly every WWII movie and video game has black people in it everywhere.

might as well post that one picture of two german soldiers in north africa lighting a smoke for a black north african civilian. "see, nazi's weren't so bad!"

A mainstream tv drama loosley based on ancient Britain is not going to please the historical accuracy autists whatever they do. It clearly has some supernatural fantasy shit in it so it's not supposed to be realistic anyway. If it wasn't the black Roman soldier you'd just complain about some other detail like the uniforms being wrong or some shit. I'm just thankful we're getting a show set in this era, it's underrated as fuck

>>87087415
The genocides of Armenians and native Americans and aborigines had no camps. In the case of native Americans, there was not even a need for organized slaughter. Disease, poverty, and alcoholism sufficed. Conditions intended to drive a group into poverty, while simultaneously importing millions of foreigners is a sufficient condition for genocide.
Q.E.D

>>87087788
So fucking what, you can always choose to not watch it.

>>87086869
>It's not unthinkable that a single black african could be recruited from the Roman colonies in African.
Soldiers recruited in African colonies would not have been sent to Britannia. And if they were, there wouldn't have been very few of them if any at all.

>>87088101
Das right, I won't be watching it.

>>87088101
Top ten reasons white racists white males are responsible for Brittania's low ratings.

File: henry-cavills-new-netflix-movie-sand-castle_2767ad48_mjpg.jpg (69KB, 960x541px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 960x541px

>>87088224
>white racists white males

>>87087769
>>lorica segmentata in 53BC
It's 43AD you dumb fuck, and not Caesar

>>87087769
>being this fucking dumb while trying to sound smart

>its a /co/ defends dumb shit in movies because they love blacks episode
getting tired of these

File: image.png (213KB, 631x501px) Image search: [Google]

213KB, 631x501px

Why does /pol/ think it's smarter than actual historians?

>>87088329
>its a /pol/ spergs out of 3 frames of a black dude in a great looking trailer episode

>>87088245
Double the privilege.

>>87088342
North Africans, you dumb shite

File: file.png (726KB, 940x530px) Image search: [Google]

726KB, 940x530px

>>87086081
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wBEEHfYU1ck

>ROMANED bongs
>roman niggers building the Wall and making the Scots pay for it

>>87088351
check imdb there are two black main characters
stop defending shitty casting and writing just because you love blacks so much

>>87088342
Because historians who disagree with /pol/ are literally part of the zionist conspiracy to make them stay virgins.

>>87086081

Maybe... Maybe he's a slave pretending to be a roman?

>>87086539
>Feels pretty good
It really shouldn't, unless you're a retard. It's incredibly pathetic of us as humans that so much hatred exists to the point that many have rallied together to bombard a video with derision and dissent because of race and not in spite of it. Sure, the show could suck, but that's not where the dislikes stem from. They're all disliking this video specifically because of the race issue, and that's fucking pathetic. I really do hope WWIII happens so these retards can be wiped from the gene pool. Maybe it'll feel really good for you to fight for the color of your skin rather than important issues like freedom, human rights and justice.

>>87088342

Who was she vilified by? Because if it's other historians then that's not racism, it's peer review.

>>87088407
fuck off tyrone go steal somewhere else

>>87088377
>stop defending shitty casting and writing just because you love blacks so much

Im not defending anything. Im gonna watch it regardless of your sperg fit. If you care so much about hating black people, why dont you create your own Roman tv series?

I understand when fanboys get mad about Ghostbusters being SJWsized. This however is an original series. I dont see the fuss over 2 black dudes.

>>87088435
hows london mgumbo

File: Hakeem_Kae-Kazim-ALO-050972-1.jpg (42KB, 425x600px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 425x600px

>>87088351
This pleases Zeus.

>>87086081
a black saxon would be retarded, a black roman soldier isn't. You know there are other types of black other than sub-saharan nigs, right?

>>87088492
>Roman empire didn't extend into sub Saharan Africa
>Shows Sub Saharan African
>As a legionnaire not an auxilary
>In Britannia of all places

>>87088435

You're a worthless, spineless turd for thinking that way. "So what if there are black dudes in the Roman army?"

What if I started injecting some self-serving political agenda in your favourite show and thereby destroy historical accuracy and story consistency? What the fuck do you even watch? My Little Pony? What if I put in Cletus the ponyfucking Nazi in there and everyone is alright with him in there while he's got a sex dungeon with a bunch of ponies in them. His backyard full of burning crosses.
Would you be happy when he's best friends with Twilight Sparkle or whoever you jack off to? What if I told you that Cletus is also the reason all the current ponies even exist in the first place because he's part of pony history? Fuck you.

Is there actually any decent academic works that deal with race in the Roman empire? I don't particularly trust 4chan or the Guardian on matters of race but I'd love to read a source I know is non-biased on the matter.

>>87088370
>make the scots pay for it

I'm pretty sure the scots didn't even have a concept of money back then, they were literally just crazed tribals who painted themselves blue and worshiped trees

>>87088492
Rome during Claudius' occupation of Britain had pretty much constructed a series of forts and walls across all of north Africa walling off the sahara entirely. Mostly north africans were a mix of goths, vandals, arabs, moors and barbars.

>>87088544
>and thereby destroy historical accuracy and story consistency
But Hollywood has been doing it since its inception.

>>87088548
you could check the roman empire borders and then check what kind of people lived and lives in it

File: 1386043741177.jpg (74KB, 677x782px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 677x782px

http://www.bbc.co.uk/ahistoryoftheworld/objects/EBvs4GUaT8Knfhl_sSpGWw

>>87087308
Unironically this. You cant be racist against Muslims.

I still dont get the argument supporting this. The historical argument is beyond retarded.
Chances are if there was black people in rome they would have been brought as slaves And certainly not as a member of the roman army.

Basically what they are suggesting is the old Western empires they keep whining about, that were super evil and keep people of color down and slaved people were also very inclusive. That is just borderline psychotic.

>>87088370
WTF pal?
Roman were NOT black as neither Italians or Spaniards are. Is this shit suppossed to be educative? Stop the brainwash, British channels

>>87086081
I mean I laugh at the WE WUZ shit and even left a dislike, but what does it matter? Im sure some Sub Saharan somehow ended in East/North Africa and then wound up in a legion. The empire was built on trade. You people forget that to the patrician civilized Romans, everyone else was a barbarian. In fact, I fail to see the difference between say scandis and the blacks at the time.

>>87086081
The BBC can do whatever they want, they don't have to answer to what people want or advertisers because the funding comes from forced taxes.

The BBC is filled with lefties and they want to push propaganda down peoples necks.

File: 1503954182540.png (301KB, 322x449px) Image search: [Google]

301KB, 322x449px

>>87088544
I loled at this.

>>87088799
The whole show looks like fantasy crap. I doubt they care about historical accuracy.

Imagine how triggered the alt left would be if they did a series on Stalin's Russia and portrayed him as a straight white male.

>>87088070
>Armenians and native Americans
You're comparing a tribal war with voted in government importing niggers because women wanted to trade "racists for rapists"? kek lad, I wish ye luck in that white knighting.

>>87087211
>tfw the alt-right weirdos are always the first people to start talking about the penises of black men

You guys really have a strange obesession with black dick.

>>87088544
>in your favourite show
This >>87086081 is your favorite show?

>>87088342
I feel really bad for North Africans desu. Every singe achievemnt their race has ever achieved just gets completely blackwashed and they can't do or say anything about it.

>>87086081
>trailer starts
>hear that hippie shit
Yeah, I can already tell this is complete garbage.

>>87088872
This isn't a BBC show, it's a Sky/Amazon production.

You are right about how the BBC operates though, and it's creeping elsewhere too

>>87088407
What's pathetic is that the industry is using diversity hires in the hope that the black audience is not turned off the show.

>>87086917
While im not a white subhuman cuck what happened to secularism?

>>87088544
Are you seriously suggesting that this is your favorite show?

Also, ad absurdum is not an argument.

>>87088407
>but that's not where the dislikes stem from. They're all disliking this video specifically because of the race
You most be fucking deranged to think this is the actual reason, lad.

>>87089453
It doesn't exist, one culture will always dominate especially when the other has been castrated.

>>87089549
>You most be fucking deranged to think this is the actual reason, lad.
Whats the reason then? And dont say historical inaccuracy please. This isnt a documentary, its fictional entertainment.

>>87086081

it has david morrisey.

driver miniseries was mumblekino.

wait does this show make the romans out to be the bad guys and the pagen brits the good guys?

File: fedoraneckbeard.jpg (13KB, 251x250px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 251x250px

oh right. another one of *those* threads

>>87089654
We could be discussing the merits of big Dothraki cock right now instead, think about that.

>>87089623
I think they'll make both sides bad seeing as the pagans have creepy looking druids. All in all as shitty as the random blacks will be, I need a new roman show so I'll give it a watch.

File: red-tape-blindfold-businessman-gun-suicide-8676691.jpg (77KB, 1300x957px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 1300x957px

>we got this trash instead of ROME

>>87089618
>And dont say historical inaccuracy please.
Why, because that's the actual answer and you're incapable of accepting it?

Whether it's fictional or not, it's based in reality that explores the story of British history. And yet again the media are pre-empting any race-related criticism of casting choices by deliberately casting PoC in stories where they have no place. See this, and the BBC Troy TV show coming soon, their docu-dramas, History Channel programs, etc.

Are they so ashamed of our history that they are willingly kowtowing to whiney bastards who refuse to accept that their place in Western history is only recent, and so force film & TV to rewrite our history to include a place for them?

File: 1503938446819.webm (2MB, 854x480px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 854x480px

>>87086081

>british people have to pay taxes to fund this

>>87089618

>b-blackwashing is ok when we do it!

>>87089809
That's why I dodge it. heheh

Really despise what the BBC has become. Perhaps it should move out of London and see what the UK is really like.

>>87086081
Doesn't TV shows and film in England have to fulfil like 20 diversity requirements in order to win awards these days?
I don't blame them

File: 1503608915982.jpg (971KB, 2078x3802px) Image search: [Google]

971KB, 2078x3802px

>>87086081

>>87089809
ah i see now, black people have always been a part of our history, we need to reverse the whitewash of history

>>87089851
Not sure where you read that, but no.

File: 1501264450545.png (2MB, 800x3857px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 800x3857px

>>87086081

>tfw british people have to pay taxes to brainwash their children

>>87088342
>she

>>87089809
>most african "countries" didnt have the wheel before white europeans came
>suddenly are in london and wealthy and intelligent enough to be middle class citizens

>>87086081
Looks fun, Titus Androniggus aside

>>87089853
>>87089918
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xXyNkxTd31A
Poor Muslims who volunteer to fight for Isis then regret it :(

>>87088342

Reminder that Mary Beard is a hack fraud that only exist to go on question time and promote multiculturalism propaganda and she got BTFO by fucking Paul Joseph Watson. Also, she is a Corbyn supporting socialist who said America deserved 911 a week after it happens, yet cries about "online sexual harrasment" every time she gets trolled for saying something retarded

https://medium.com/east-med-project-history-philology-and-genetics/the-insidious-racism-of-mary-beard-et-al-8b6b768b4575

>>87089954
Looks like another GoT clone that are popping up recently, like The Last Kingdom

>>87089809
Eternal Anglo strikes again.

>>87090003
>and she got BTFO by fucking Paul Joseph Watson.
When and how exactly?

>>87089918
This is 1984 tier bullshit. They can't get away with it.

>>87090051
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xXyNkxTd31A


All that Beard and her retarded defenders have is ONE (1) study that found 10% of the city of York were possibly north african/syrian based on oxygen in their bones, which has nothing to do with race in the first place. The idea that Roman Britian was full of blacks is pure we wuzian dogshit and it hillarious watching leftist actually try to shill this shit

>Rupert Murdoch at it again
The guys makes money off creating this kind of shit then making his other media platforms agitate against it, pitting people against eachother for profit.

>>87089918
Did someone draw littlefinger into the third one
O I am laffin

>>87087426
Why wouldn't someone be upset if there taxes are paying with something they disagree with?

>>87089918
>littlefinger in the back
lmao

>>87089809
WHAT IS THIS SHIT?! That's a blatant lie. Oh wait, the showrunner has actively come out and said he wants to rewrite history co-opting Dr Who as a medium. What is this fucking madness? How did we get here?

>>87090141
>thinking rupert murdoch had any say in the casting of this tv show

mate, how fucking dumb are you?

>>87089775
Again. Create your own tv series, if its not "historically accurate enough" for you. Its not a reason to throw a hissy fit and pretend like its the worst thing ever.

I come from an Axis power in WW2 and it doesnt bother me when the evil Nazi guy slowly stabs the Jewish GI while muttering "evil" things. Hollywood makes the best looking ENTERTAINMENT and thats that.

Is it propaganda? Maybe. Then dont watch it.

>>87090123
What PJW said was wrong though, and not that the BBC are justified in creating this inaccurate portrayal, but he's just as thick and ignorant as Beard is.

>>87090328
>Again. Create your own tv series
Why don't you create yours, you fucking thick nigger?

>americans inject niggers into every movie and show
>56% white nation
>when any other county displays the same behaviour they chimp out
you hate yourselves more than anything and can't admit it

>>87090328
>Its not a reason to throw a hissy fit and pretend like its the worst thing ever.

What on Earth are you jabbering on about, you hysterical pleb?

>>87090346
>What PJW said was wrong though,

no he isnt. What specific part about history do you think he was wrong about?

>>87090362
>Why don't you create yours, you fucking thick nigger?
I dont have to. Im not the one throwing an autistic tantrum due to a black person in a trailer.

>>87090399
>What on Earth are you jabbering on about, you hysterical pleb?
Delusions of eloquence coupled with severe autism isnt pretty friend. Maybe stick to the argument.

>>87090400
Yes it was. He claimed Roman Britain wasn't ethically diverse, it was.

Now clearly you're another gimp who worships at the alter of this fucking shouty, uneducated faggot, but try reading a fucking book.

>>87089918
It looks like they deleted the videos lol

File: 1503088484690.jpg (157KB, 656x893px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 656x893px

>>87086081
>Everything revolves around racial/identity politics, be it in a positive or negative sense
Anglos and Americans were a mistake.

File: 1503526093572.jpg (761KB, 2604x2096px) Image search: [Google]

761KB, 2604x2096px

>>87090448
>Im not the one throwing an autistic tantrum due to a black person in a trailer.

but "your side" obviously is the one who raises a shit storm about white washing of fictional characters all the time, yet you hypocritically think black washing of actual history is not a real complaint.

>>87090448
>Im not the one throwing an autistic tantrum
but indeed are at the responses to it, you odious nigger

>>87087185
Why is her asshole where her bellybutton should be?

>>87090473
>He claimed Roman Britain wasn't ethically diverse, it was.

he never claimed that. He said it wasnt diverse by modern standards, which includes the idea that it was full of black people.

Again, Paul joseph Watson is 100% right and you, as well as Beard, are wrong. This is why you needed to resort to a strawman argument.

stop being retarded and unirconically believing in we wuzian bullshit anon.

>>87090222
Rupert Murdoch most likely set the guidelines for the network, anon. He runs it.

Like how the BBC has rules about representation; they weren't made up by the people who draw the cartoon history videos linked earlier, or the people who personally cast the Troy mini-series.

>>87090448
>Maybe stick to the argument.

Yes, maybe you should.

>>87087185

its an autistic labour party belief that if western countries are filled with brown people, then they will all mix together and everyone will live in harmony as one race.

Its pretty ironic, since at the core of this belief, they KNOW multiculturalism is doomed to fail since they think the only way for peace to exist is if there is only one race.

>>87090489
>but "your side" obviously is the one who raises a shit storm about white washing of fictional characters all the time, yet you hypocritically think black washing of actual history is not a real complaint.
Assumptions are the mother of all fuck ups. This isnt /pol/. I enjoy films and television ENTERTAINMENT. Furthermore Im not from the US, or England, arguably the 2 most "cucked" nations on the planet. I couldnt give a rats ass about either side of your American lack of education personified in a generation of neo-nazis and SJWs.

Youre the one making this political (or racial).

>>87090497
>but indeed are at the responses to it, you odious nigger
Except you people are the ones triggered by 3 frames of a black person in a 4 minute trailer.

Again, Im gonna enjoy this tv series, because I love Roman history so much that I try to travel to Rome and spend weeks travelling the ancient streets and visiting the museums. I wanna see this, because it interests me.

You are the one insulting other people, having spergic episodes and essentially making this all about "race".

>>87090328
People are rightfully pointing out blatant inaccuracies made for the sake of politically motivated pandering. This shit needs to be challenged. What the fuck is wrong with you? This isn’t Hollywood; this is a tax payer funded channel trying to deceive people by promoting a false history. How is this not something that needs to be called out?

>>87090614
>I couldnt give a rats ass about either side of your American lack of education personified in a generation of neo-nazis and SJWs.

and yet, here you are aruging about it. Stop with this woman tier bullshit of "I dont care" in place of an argument when you obviously do care. You are the one who will bitch and moan about what a crime it is when some whitey plays a brown comic book character or something, yet think its no big deal when media starts to push historical revisionist lies by blackwashing history.

>>87090537
>He said it wasnt diverse by modern standards,
No that's not what he was pulled apart on. His claims were factually inaccurate.

>which includes the idea that it was full of black people.
Which I have already pointed out to you was inaccurate by the BBC to portray the non-whites in Roman Britain as sub-Saharans.

>Again, Paul joseph Watson is 100% right
Afraid not. He, as usual, is torn to bits over his lack of education and shameful ignorance.

>This is why you needed to resort to a strawman argument.
You clearly do not understand what a strawman argument is.

>stop being retarded and unirconically believing in we wuzian bullshit anon.
Here's a strawman argument, seeing as you do not know what one is.

>>87090671
>This shit needs to be challenged.
THERES A NIGGER IN MA TV CLETUS, CALL THE COPS!!!!!!!!!!

>>87090695
>and yet, here you are aruging about it. Stop with this woman tier bullshit of "I dont care" in place of an argument when you obviously do care. You are the one who will bitch and moan about what a crime it is when some whitey plays a brown comic book character or something, yet think its no big deal when media starts to push historical revisionist lies by blackwashing history.

Again with the assumptions m8. This thread is created by people assblasted about this one black guy in the trailer. Im pointing out the irrelevance. Youre the one repeatedly making the "argument" that its SJWs pandering. Dont project your own racial insecurities onto others.

Some of us come from the 1st world (NOT ENGLAND OR THE US) and we actually dont give a fuck. Were just happy that we get to watch some quality entertainment, since our countries make garbage tv series.

>>87090567
>Rupert Murdoch most likely set the guidelines for the network, anon. He runs it.
Actually, he doesn't.

Furthermore, this is a SKY AND AMAZON PRIME VIDEO production, if you genuinely think Murdoch has informed them to cast blacks for diversity purposes you're a fucking moron that should consider suicide.

>>87090705
>resorting to ad hominem
Yeah, thanks, I already know I'm right. Your all caps chimp out is just the icing on the cake.

>>87090697
>No that's not what he was pulled apart on.

then why did you feel the need to lie and strawman his argument? Why is this the one and only part of his argument you addressed?

Also, you dont get to be the condescending one when you are factually wrong, have no argument, and are unironcically arguing that we wuzian bullshit is real.

Again, Paul NEVER claimed there was NO diversity of any kind in Roman Britain. ethnic diversity could be all different types of white people. There is only one study that shows 10% of York was possibly north african or from syria. There is NO proof that Roman Britain was full of blacks. You are wrong and have no argument. Continue to shuck and jive though since you and I both know you lost.

>>87090614
>Except you people are the ones triggered by 3 frames of a black person in a 4 minute trailer.
And you're triggered by people highlighting yet another example of blackwashing because you vile niggers cannot accept you have no place in the West and never have

>>87090769
>starts with insults
>gets shocked when responded with ad absurdum (not ad hominem, but how would he know?)

>>87090810
>3rd assumption in 3 posts

You sound insecure friend. If youre entire argument is based on emotional projection and assumption, that should tell you something about the quality of your argument.

>>87086081
why the FUCK are whites playing romans again?

romans were MEDS they weren't WHITE OR BLACK

>>87090802
Again, you clearly do not understand what a strawman argument is, so perhaps best you stop using it trying to make out you have a valid argument.

PJW made a claim, he was wrong and was destroyed for it. You can defend the pathetic little faggot all you want. You cannot rewrite history, just like the BBC

>>87090761
>he thinks this is going to be quality entertainment
this trailer look cheaper than first season of spartacus

>>87090846
You have no argument. You're an odious nigger incapable of accepting that a world was created and you offered virtually fuck all to other than picking cotton.

>>87090887
>you clearly do not understand what a strawman argument is

you said Paul argued that there was NO diversity in Roman Britain when he never claimed that. That is what a strawman argument is anon.

>PJW made a claim, he was wrong and was destroyed for it.

no he didnt. You know this which is why you strawmanned and are no playing stupid and shucking and jiving just like I knew you would. Again, what did Paul get wrong? Remember that he never said there was no diversity, this is a strawman lie you just came up with so you cant use that.

>>87086869
romans only got as far as southern egypt/north sudan, they didn't interact with negros

File: Untitled.jpg (98KB, 512x561px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 512x561px

>>87090955
You genuinely are the dumbest cunt I have ever seen on /tv/, probably why you vehemently defend a faggot cretin like PJW

>>87091016

here anon, let me post the video for you again

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wtPZhDH4QU8

now tell me what part of his argument is wrong anon. Stop being mad and stop being retarded and believing in we wuzian blackwashing of history anon

File: w45ye5h.jpg (18KB, 247x248px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 247x248px

>>87091083
I've just posted his actual tweet that you're claiming doesn't exist, you stupid fuck

THANKS YOU NIGGERS FOR CREATING EVERYTHING

File: WE.jpg (713KB, 3124x1068px) Image search: [Google]

713KB, 3124x1068px

So it was the nigger who taught whitey how to farm all along. Why isn't the Emerdale cast black then?

File: World_1_CE.png (777KB, 1600x814px) Image search: [Google]

777KB, 1600x814px

>>87090974
here's a map just in case anyone is confused

it's definitely plausible, just like it's plausible to have a lost Inca prince washed up on the shores of europe recruited by the roman legions fighting in britain, but it's highly unlikely and it's only there for propaganda purposes(remember negros are less than 1% of the British population)

>>87091124

Try reading the tweet and tell me where he claims there was NO diversity

now stop shucking and jiving and tell me what part he got wrong. Or you can man up and just admit you were wrong. Or are you going to conintue to defend this retarded shit that you know isnt true

File: 1492731511871.jpg (227KB, 1134x708px) Image search: [Google]

227KB, 1134x708px

GET WOKE

>>87091304

HOL UP

>>87088407
Your interest in freedom, human rights, and justice is not shared by those whom you defend.

how many niggers are there in britbongistan? i mean i got used to americans worshiping black people, but brits are obsessed with the BBC aswell

>>87091259
Jesus Christ, lad. Are you even following your own claims?

He's berated the BBC for claiming Roman Britain was ethnically diverse and then sarcastically called into question the historically accuracy of it.

You're literally defending this dumb cunt out of some misplaced loyalty, why? He was wrong and shown as such.

>oh no there's literally one O N E LMAO black legionnaire in an empire encompassing the entire Mediterranean how revisionist!!!

you lads racist, retarded, or memeing?

How come people don't throw a fit when theater has literally any race playing any character willy-nilly?

>mauri, berber tribes, libyans, egyptians e other ancient mediterranean peoples
>sub-saharian negroid

the eternal anglo strikes back

>>87091394
>He's berated the BBC for claiming Roman Britain was ethnically diverse and then sarcastically called into question the historically accuracy of it.

watch the video anon. Stop shucking and jiving. He NEVER said there was no ethnic diversity

>>87087426
What a bizarre and demonstrably incorrect opinion. Take a look at universities and museums in America and leftist protests that have demanded and achieved the cancelling of speakers and exhibits that are completely mainstream. In many cases these do not even involve taxpayer funding.

>>87087674
If it were only that but you and I both know it's not.

>Temporary auxilia service
>Oh Roman Britain was ethnically diverse!111!!

>>87086869
I'm not /pol/, I'm a white girl who knows and loves my own history and I'm sick of "liberals" shitting all over it. If you don't think there's a blatant anti-white agenda in the media now you're a retard, it's that simple.

>>87087593
Yes, and? Maximus died in Gladiator, does that make his presence in the film irrelevant?

>>87091450
>He NEVER said there was no ethnic diversity
It's inferred it in his tweet, you stupid cunt. It's literally there in words what he claimed, he's wrong and was BTFO like the thick faggot he is.


>>87091391
They make up about 3-4% of our population and the vast majority are in London


>>87091563
And slaves and traders. Peoples in Roman Britain were drawn from all over the Roman Empire. London in particular was known to be ethically diverse.

What is wrong here, as I have explained to the dumb PJW-worshipping cock, is the portrayal of Africans as being sub-Saharan.

File: Roman_Empire_Trajan_117AD.png (824KB, 1920x1167px) Image search: [Google]

824KB, 1920x1167px

>>87086081
kek you're doing the same mistake as the alt righter who started this fire

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/07/27/alt-right-commentator-gets-schooled-historian-diversity-roman/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people_in_Ancient_Roman_history

>Rome had provinces in North Africa along the Mediterranean coast. The black African troops there were part of the Roman military

This wasnt hard to find at all.

>>87091655
not that anon, but an entirely plausible ethnic casting isn't representative of it.

Also, how do you differentiate between anti-white and pro-ethnic, or do you see them as one and the same?

>>87091723
think you need to do some research, if not, read the thread

legionaries would have been roman citizens from around italy and northern italy. north africans (who look VERY different to sub sahran africans) would have been used in a few auxiliary units and would have been rare and unlikely to have gone to britain

but instead we have a subsaharan african in a roman legion (with the wrong armor on) in Britain

>>87091746
You are pretending that this casting choice was made for any other reason than propagandistic ones. Why are you diong this?

>>87091723
>north africa
>black

M8. The people who were settled along the North African coast weren't black as they are portrayed in media, they were predominantly migrant folk from The Levant.

Africa is a vast, wide and populous continent, to claim the peoples there are all the same is simply fucking wrong.

>>87091797
You think that fucking retard bothered to search stuff? He's content with what he has been told.
The moment rome reached north africa the entire empire became mulatto, because that's what his reassuring authority told him.

>>87091723

>DA ALT RIGHT!

>thinking north african=black

fucking stupid normie. Kill yourself retard

>>87091723
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people_in_Ancient_Roman_history

Was this article written by a 12-year-old? Why is "antiquity" repeatedly being capitalized?

>>87090328
Several of the Germans that I have met have had this same, sad attitude.

We really did a number on you guys with the two world wars, eh? Your forefathers would be ashamed.

>>87086939
>Sky Atlantic
>socialism

>>87090328
>being this cucked by Merkel or whatever Axis power you come from

>>87091394
I'm not the guy you are arguing with but you are clearly wrong and avoiding all of his points, just give up pls pal.

>>87091723
Rami Malek is a North African you stupid fuck

>>87086081
for a programme to be approved for production in the UK it must meet a set minimum diversity quota. this is simply a matter of law

whats amusing is that this, intentionally or not, applies almost exclusively to blacks. there are literally millions more arabs, indians, pakistanis etc in the UK than blacks, but they have almost 0 representation on TV or in media. ironically diveristy laws have become nothing more than institutionalised casual racism; unless its a black face it doesnt count

You know when you hear certain things and immediately can tell they're bullshit? Like "there's fiberglass in chewing tobacco" et cetera et cetera.

It's prima facie ridiculous that sub-Saharan Africans would be serving in any appreciable number in Roman legions anywhere, let alone Britannia.

But you pathetic fucks keep trying to justify it.

>>87091798
so the fact that there is a push for black casting atm means even reasonable black castings are bad?

>>87091655

A tv show isn't history you slag

>>87092101
>this samefagging

Lel. I thought you'd finally fucked off after the tweet was posted, which proved you wrong, but now you're back for more.

Bless.

>>87091798
>this casting choice was made for any other reason than propagandistic ones

Yeah, propaganda I'm sure. Definitely not for the sake of inclusiveness, or because they're a good actor, or because it's fun to like different things.

>>87092111
>for a programme to be approved for production in the UK it must meet a set minimum diversity quota. this is simply a matter of law
Simply incorrect. This isn't America.

Nice bait though.

>>87092128
No one cares, they're just trying to weasel around it while not putting up a forthright defense because it would be too ridiculous.

File: nig.jpg (50KB, 427x640px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 427x640px

>>87091723
Hello fellow North African.

>>87092234
http://www.bbc.co.uk/mediacentre/latestnews/2016/diversity
Fuck off with your wrongthink.

>>87092232
>inclusiveness

how did you manage to misspell "t-u-m-b-l-r" in the address bar this badly?

>>87092130
Why are you pretending that this was a reasonable casting and not simply a choice made to misrepresent history for modern political purposes?

>>87086869
IF that was the case, they were far, FAR rarer than what the BBC wants you to think.

The issue is that the BBC is rewriting history that cannot be backed up in order to appeal to idiots. It's entirely dishonest and I wonder why people make excuses for them.

>>87092275
Okay. Not only have you completely misunderstood the content on the link you have posted, but you clearly don't seem to understand that the BBC aren't the only producers of TV in the UK, in fact the program in the OP isn't a BBC production.

There is no law in this country that stipulates a TV program has to meet a "set minimum diversity quota" like you have claimed, you braindead niggercunt.

Please go kill yourself.

>>87087415
>concentration camps
You don't need them, the UN definition of genocide even expresses that you can do it via many ways, such as altering birthrates.

>>87092396
This isn't a BBC program. It is a Sky and Amazon Prime production.

How many more times does this need to be pointed out to you, you thick cunt?

>>87087674
>lol even though it's set in a real place at a real time it's fictional
Might as well have them fight orcs then

>>87092383
ok, you're autistic, I'll stop replying now

None of this crap would matter if people just read books. Whatever.

>>87086869
People here say it wouldn't have happened because of historical reasons X, Y and Z, but it doesn't seem really implausible or something that would be out of line for historical fiction.

Of course we know the real reason why a black guy would be in a role like this in 2017.

>>87092422
Nobody is restricting you to have only one child.

>>87092410
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/jon-holmes-bbc-presenter-sacked-white-man-mail-on-sunday-a7341831.html
More of an unspoken rule. Now enjoy your diversified television.

>Historic show replaces whites with blacks
>No problem
>Fantasy show has whites playing north Arabs
>Stop whitewashing Blacks! muh pharaons and shit!
Also what's happening in Hellboy, what a shit show. Double standards are very real, violent SJW and Blacks clearly don't want whites around

>>87092422
>such as altering birthrates.
Physically preventing births is in the defintion, not altering birthrates anon

>>87092555
You're not addressing any of the rebuttals to your claims. I guess because at this point you realise you're wrong and are too stubborn to just admit it.

>>87092596
>Hellboy
What?

File: 61231994_p0_master1200.jpg (208KB, 977x1171px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 977x1171px

>African history boils down to nomadic tribes attacking and enslaving eachother and not evolving past the copper age at best
>not a single show about african cultures because the media is too inept or too scared to create an interesting story in that setting
>instead they'll use revisionist media that turns historically white or asian cultures into some diverse nonsense while still having mediocrity in terms of story and characters
>but it features fake diversity where the african characters are either tokens or oreos
>we will never get a proper show or movie about cool africans doing cool african things in africa with various pagan gods and day-to-day tribal survival a-la Apocalypto
>instead we get Roman, British, American, and other historical shows and movies where many of the main characters will be black for no reason narratively and even historical mythology re-envisioned into some bizarre anti-racist racist tripe

>>87092643
In the new hellboy it was ok to cast a dirty dread hair mulatto to play the role of a pale white redhead, but it was bad (and they shamed the actor into resigning) when a white actor was going to play a half Asian

>>87092641
>>>/pol/

As for Troy tv show, I think is pretty realistic, Zeus always liked to morph into animals and beasts, I think it's fitting.

>>87092641
You are trying to argue that the BBC does not make explicit effort to ensure that its content is diverse. Do you understand that this makes you look ridiculous?

Everyone knows that they have this as a major objective.

>>87092716
>>>/lgbt/

>>87090026
ah, so it will be much better than got, then?

>>87086869
>>87086945
There were precisely fucking zero sub-saharan Legionaries. Zero.

File: 1485777313908.gif (2MB, 193x200px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 193x200px

>>87088544

>>87092752
Your claim was "for a programme to be approved for production in the UK it must meet a set minimum diversity quota. this is simply a matter of law"

This is simply incorrect, there is no law enforcing this at all. Furthermore, this program in the OP is not a BBC program.

Please kill yourself, you stupid fat mongrel cunt

>>87092496
But you're objectively wrong. In 43AD there is a zero percent chance of a nigger legionary even existing, let alone being all the way over in Britain. I suspect you're just a nigger though.

>>87092790
No, it'll be poorly written, directed and acted trash.

>>87092838
Not that poster.

However, are you going to lie and say that you would not support such a law, were it to be implemented?

>>87092794
How do you know that. I'm sure a couple >>87092845

Gibs me dat culture n history whiteboi

>>87092881
>Not that poster.

Of course you aren't. You've been utterly ruined and are now trying to distance yourself from your stupid and inaccurate claims.

>>87092736
So what is the defense for this type of content? Yea, there's no longer any even slightly plausible historical justification, but you still shouldn't care, for some reason?

>>87092926
*fucking reenslaves u*

File: kek.jpg (109KB, 413x395px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 413x395px

>>87092838
The tv license lads are going full damage control.

>>87087225
No.

>>87092913
>I don't know a fucking lick about history but I want everyone to know I love niggers, what should I do?
>I've got it!
>I'll just say "how do you know that?" and ignore all of the historical reasons throughout the thread telling me exactly how everyone knows that there is a zero percent chance of a nigger legionary in 43AD
I bet you'd make a nice Alabama windchime.

>>87092993
I don't pay it. Jokes on you nigger

>>87092881
>However, are you going to lie and say that you would not support such a law, were it to be implemented?

Im neither of those anons, but how do you reason that anon would support it based on him arguing that is not in fact such a law and nothing else in his post?

>>87092947
If it makes you feel better to believe only one person could disagree with you, whatever man.

Are you still going to pretend that you would not support or excuse laws mandating diversity in media? That is the point of shows like this, which you have chosen to defend. Historical accuracy is not even close to relevant, they are produced in service of politics.

I'm part black, but this is retarded. Rome never even conquered any majority black regions. At most there were some black auxiliaries in the Middle East, but actual troops in Britannia would've been natives, citizens, or hired Germans.

>>87087587
Oh please your kind is constantly parading about how you are above everything and claiming that "word cant hurt you ,you faggot" You're just acting contrarian because you dont have a point

>>87093076
>Faggot
I'm already on the phone to the rozzers lad, you best tell your loved ones you love them because you're going to be locked up for life for this kind of wrongthink.

>>87091723
I hope this is bait

>>87089956
That is true tho,a lot of those shithead who go to Syria want to go back to their country immediately when the ISIS guy give them primarly menial task like cleaning the toilet when they expected to drown in pootang
(I'm not saying that they dont have genuinely moticvated sickos migrating to Syria tho)

>>87093076
>your kind
>faggot
We got a tolerant lefty here.

>>87093061
Rewriting our history in the way they do is wrong and I would not support any law regarding TV production that does.

But there is no law despite your claims, and no where have I defended this nonsense, just ripped apart your pathetic and sinister lies.

As I said previously, please kill yourself.

>>87093189
They get to come back and are given police protection usually.

>>87093135
>dem 1984 buzzword
lel

>>87093061
If you follow the reply chain, the only thing anon is arguing against is someone saying there is a law where there is none. I thought this thread was against making things up (or is it just when it suit)

>>87093194
Well,your kind is indeed full of faggot
>inb4 whinning about Reddit

>>87093279
>>>/pol/

>>87093272
y-you can prove anything with facts

>>87087875

There shouldn't be a black guy is the point.

>>87093253
Yeah, there's no bullshit about wrongthink in Britain.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2012/mar/27/student-jailed-fabrice-muamba-tweets

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4075328/Man-jailed-leaving-bacon-sandwiched-outside-mosque-dead-prison-half-way-12-month-sentence.html

>>87088342
>get over it
Why do these articles always have contempt for their readers?

>>87088342

>Semitic people descended from Greeks are suddenly turned into sub-saharan blacks.
>Gets vilified for trying to claim they're dark west africans from below the desert in the ROMAN EMPIRE

I wonder why.

>>87087769
Lorica Segmentata is attested to since before b.c.

Lern to history buddy.

I'm more concerned about druids in fucking stonehenge. What the fuck?

If there are female druids I will fucking puke

>>87093337
You're not going to get through to the average self hating estrogen filled remainer.

when did /tv/ turn into /pol/? does this subreddit not have mods?

>>87093054
It's a concern troll, nothing more. People attempt to cover for and distract from the BBC's quite open policy of promoting diversity (for its own sake) by quibbling over the letter of the law, rather than the spirit of it. Even beyond any explicit written policy, the BBC fosters a culture of "inclusiveness" and constantly works to further diversify its staff and the content it produces. Most modern companies, especially media companies, do exactly the same thing. Literally everyone, right or left, understands this. The only difference is some support it and some don't, but denying that this process is happening is ludicrous.

I reason that people who choose to defend such companies are sympathetic to their overall aims (and would thus have no problem supporting diversity quotas), or are at least people who are moderate about or disinterested in politics and harbor a distaste for those whom they consider to be /pol/tards. Such moderates would passively accept these laws without raising any big fuss, and would by then have come up with some new rationalizations and apologetic arguments to justify their position.

why are there so many black people on brit tv? i was literally stunned and in disbelief when i found out there's hardly any over there, but the shows make you think they're like 1/3 of the fucking population

>>87091655
You're probably right about everything but you being a girl.

You're not a girl.

>>87093464
Brits are into negroes. Just look at BBC.

>>87093441
BBC policy is not enforceable law requiring all UK produced TV shows to have set diversity quotas like you claimed.

Romans had six fingers. I mean surely there was at least one roman somewhere who had six fingers. So you can say that six.

>>87086869
You are completely ignorant about history.

>I'm s-sure it happened at SOME point!
>My feelings tell me this probably happened in history xD

No, there is objective proof that you're wrong, the romans were exceptionally good at recording their history and we know for a fact that there were only two legions of auxilia (who are not the main force of roman troops anyway) who could have been described as 'black.' They were from northeast africa but let's call them black for arguments sake.
Both those legions were destroyed without seeing action anywhere other than africa. This is recorded history and it was recorded because it seemed out of the ordinary to roman citizens at the time.
If it were the norm, why wouldn't they tell us this in their extremely detailed histories and dialogues?

>>87093568
*that they had six

>>87092232
>fun to like different things

Give them airplanes or explosives or the ability to smash your stupid head through the TV screen if you like fun different things then.

>>87093464
1. Because our media is mostly based in London which is incredibly diverse and so people involved in programming thick this urban bubble they live in is reflective of the whole UK.

2. Blacks in particular moan and complain about opportunities (Elba, Oyelowo, Newton), their British identity and their role in our history and therefore emotionally blackmail their way to over representation in our media.

>>87093520
Again, you keep thinking only one person could disagree with you.

I hope it's true that you oppose these diversification efforts and attempts to revise history.

>>87092596
>muh pharaons

Kek'd

>>87093574
That's fair, but you know that this was never about history. Or at least, I hope you know that.

This type of material is produced by people who believe that their ideals are more valuable than the truth.

>>87086856
>downvotes on a youtube video don't do shit
It might one day. A guy in France got Suspended sentence because he liked an ISIS picture on facebook.

>>87093464
London is majority non-white and where most of the productions happen. They're all uppity as fuck too and Jews have owned Britain since Cromwell ended their exile.

>>87093418
ummm sweetie?

>>87093654
You're just not convincing enough to successfully samefag.

And you're not disagreeing with me. You're attempting to defend your inaccurate claims regarding the law in the UK.

>>87093799
Why is it illegal to say "whites only" in your job advertisements but legal to say "non-whites only" in your job advertisements in England?

>>87093441
I feel like your missing that people also have a distaste for when people spout outright falsehoods and dont want them to go unchallenged. The anons talking about actual laws which is a different game to company directives. Should I say that in Germany, muslims by law must be potrayed only positevly? And when someone disagrees with me then say "well your just trying to distract us from what the media companies are doing", even though its two different things.

>>87093799
It's a weird feeling, seeing someone so deluded yet with such conviction. I guess I can't prove anything to you.

>>87093997
Certainly not as weird as you samefagging after spewing lies and getting caught out.

>>87086081
>that Donovan song
why?

>>87093972
Well I wouldn't be surprised to see Germany pass such a law. But you make a fair point. The truth is what matters most. That's why revisionist shows like the one discussed in this thread are so odious, in the first place.

>>87093746
Fair enough. We can agree on that.
And the trailer looks weirdly inaccurate in other ways also. The druids standing on top of stonehenge is fucking retarded, what are they even doing up there? It doesn't make sense and is clearly just done for show.

>>87094160
If history isn't sacred, what is? When we throw truth out the window like this in favour of an ideal, we're opening the door to losing our history altogether.
How long before some lunatic lefty gets in power and declares that our history should be destroyed because it doesn't align with their ideology?
Inb4 this would never happen; Mao did it to China and historians from China are still in mourning about the loss of countless Ancient Chinese artefacts that he destroyed because they went agianst his communistic, regressive beliefs

>>87094372
This thread's dead but I wanna suggest you stop accepting the progressive/regressive dichotomy. History doesn't have a direction, if you believe it does you're already halfway to being a "progressive" yourself.

>>87092422
>>87092538
Not that I believe in it, but the general idea is that via consumerism and porn, people are deliberately altering the birthrates of the Japanese and German.

Commonly expressing that we need less children because of global warning, and then whinging that we don't have enough workers.

>>87094935
>people are deliberately altering the birthrates of the Japanese and German.
>deliberately
Oh fuck off. What now, the Jews control the Japanese porn industry too? Italy and other European countries also have plummeting birthrates, why did you focus on eternal kraut victims?

And Abe is doing his fucking best to motivate his retarded gooks to breed. Even if you remove porn and their other hobbies they still won't fuck each other because of their horrible work practices and lack of lives.

>blaming the media instead of your liberated cunt women who nobody wants to marry and impregnate anymore
Fucking cuck.

>>87095109
That guy said he didn't even believe in it. Take a breath dude.

The idea that this was some master plan is dubious, but all the information is available now to demonstrate that feminism and modern social values result in sterility. So in that sense, people who continue to knowingly promote such values are complicit, although they need not have planned anything from the beginning.

>>87095293
If you believe women should vote, you are a feminist. By definition.

And yes, that does result in societal collapse. You're either going to be traditional to the core like religious communities and breed like rabbits or you're going to try and be modern and equal and die off within a century only to be replaced by a more traditional society.

>>87086081
there was loads of shit on the UK news yesterday about the guy not being the asian comic book character, but apparently if you think that white people in a country that was 100% white 1000 years ago should be white when a tv show is made about that country 1000 years in the past, then you're a nazi.