now that the dust has settled, what went wrong?

>>86758324

I still haven't unwrapped it. I'm afraid if I watch it I won't like rlm anymore

>>86758324
Critics are able to effectively tear something down (which anyone with a >90 IQ and a fairly large vocabulary can do) but when it comes to creating something of their own instead of latching on to a pre-existing work like a parasitic leech, their lack of talent and creativity clearly shows. Unable to create anything of value himself, the eternal contrarian cannot express himself by any other means than to snidely reflect his surroundings like a faulty mirror. In a sense, professional critics are the most pitiful of creatures. They are able to understand and analyze what it is exactly that they enjoy about art, as well as what makes good art, but when it comes to creating it, they always miss the mark. They will forever be outside looking in, sarcastically mocking artists who have that special quality that they will never be able to attain.

>>86758532
I'm asking what went wrong with the movie, not a monologue about people who didn't like it

>>86758324
Mike hiding his true performing self in that mongoloid accent

>>86758324
they're too scared to really try, so they self sabotage and hide behind the veil of irony