35mm scans

That looks great, actually. I mean, I understand why they can't have a summer blockbuster about dinosaurs look like that but it would certainly be interesting

File: jpscene1.jpg (129KB, 1368x768px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 1368x768px

>>71677294
compared to the color correct home release

File: 0000135mm.m2ts_snapshot_00.58.29_[2016.07.05_17.46.14].jpg (146KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 1280x720px

>>71677294
recollects 2433

File: 0000135mm.m2ts_snapshot_01.31.26_[2016.07.05_17.48.19].jpg (103KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 1280x720px

>>71678003
Theres also another group out there with a supposedly open matte reel which id LOVE to see

>>71677294
that's not what it looked like

>>71678101
what did it look like

>>71677294
Are you trying to say they intended it to look that desaturated? I have a hard time believing that

>>71678313
Im not saying it was intended, I'm saying thats how It looked when the reel send to the theaters by Universal was placed on the projector

Holy shit are film prints kino

>>71677294
this looks like absolute dogshit. how was this scanned, with a camcorder?

>>71678530
go suck a foot or something tarantino

>>71678065
>>71677294
This looks an awful lot like cheap bootleg camrips 2bh

>>71678598
>>71678101

urassic Park - 35mm Cinema Print Scan

This AVCHD was created from the 1080p MKV Release (version 1.0)

This is the 16mm scan, performed with an LUT and slightly color corrected.

Format: 720p AVCHD
VIDEO: 720p x624 1.78:1
AUDIO: AC-3 5.1 640kbps (ripped from the cinema DTS CDs)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This release is a 720p encode of a 4K Jurassic Park theatrical print scan. No digital cleanup has been done yet, all the scratches, cue marks etc are left in, although the print is relatively clean.

The source print is open-matte (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_matte), which means there are a lot of viable aspect ratio options. This early version is 1.78:1 to fit perfectly with modern TVs, but the final cleaned-up release will most likely be cropped to theatrical 1.85:1.

AVCHD audio track is optical Dolby Stereo captured from the print. It was used in theatres which didn't have the DTS system installed.
The Cinema DTS was ripped from CDs that were playing in theatres 22 years ago. It is included in the torrent, but is not part of the AVCHD file.

AVCHD: Stabilised and degrained.

>>71678652
is it on kat?

>>71677294
is it just me or does it look like they all have some sickly green tint over their faces here.
think i prefer the official distributed version at least.

>>71678652
So it was from a 16mm print, not 35?

Also it doesn't say how it was scanned. For all we know it was captured with a video camera

File: 0000135.m2ts_snapshot_01.38.25_[2016.07.05_18.20.44].jpg (428KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

428KB, 1280x720px

>>71679055
Youre right, could be a shitty capture

File: 0000135mm.m2ts_snapshot_00.21.52_[2016.07.05_18.26.59].jpg (528KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

528KB, 1280x720px

>>71679177
heres a frame with color and tint corrected by me via MPC

>>71677294
>>71678003
>>71678065
>>71679177
>>71679418
torrent?

File: 00001.m2ts_snapshot_00.25.22_[2016.07.05_18.32.18].jpg (456KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

456KB, 1280x720px

>>71679583
>>71678732

its on KAT. search jurassic park 35mm

>>71679177
>>71679627
It seems like it's balanced to tungsten instead of daylight

File: 00001.m2ts_snapshot_00.40.43_[2016.07.05_18.38.35].jpg (472KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

472KB, 1280x720px

>>71679627
these last 3 caps have all be manually color corrected by the way, and if anything the hue of pink faces instead of green look better

File: 00001.m2ts_snapshot_00.46.25_[2016.07.05_18.46.39].jpg (665KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

665KB, 1280x720px

>>71679823

File: 1467135956216.png (134KB, 472x759px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 472x759px

>>71677294
>Alan's pose

sleek & subtle, brother

File: 00001.m2ts_snapshot_00.22.49_[2016.07.05_18.29.52].jpg (523KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

523KB, 1280x720px

>>71681346
Dr. Grant I'm DNA

>>71681506
yeesh

the chaosh rishesh

File: Qt-Tizen-TizenExperts[1].jpg (54KB, 500x589px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 500x589px

>>71679823

File: Jurassic.Park.1993.720p.HDTV.x264.DTS.mkv_snapshot_01.46.49_[2014.09.18_23.10.31].jpg (74KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 1280x720px

>>71681586

File: ANH Comparison 2.jpg (395KB, 2000x1176px) Image search: [Google]

395KB, 2000x1176px

Harmy's versions are amazing but they're not straight up scans as far as I know. I think they're mostly based on the Special Edition Blu ray's with some specific parts taken from scans/dvds/laserdisc rips and masterfully combined to replicate the SW experience many of us had as kids. There is the Silver Screen edition though which is entirely based on found film reels, though apparently the group who made it is now hated by the OT purist community for using the Greedo scene they got from someone else without permission. It's a great version but far from perfect.

The top is from Harmy's Despecialized version 2.5 I think, the bottom is the Silver Screen 35mm scan, and the right is from the Laserdisc rips.

File: 1390344113312.gif (2MB, 228x261px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 228x261px

>>71681918
I'm gonna saddle that Sattler.

>>71677294
>but thats how the master reel looked in 1993

You obviously weren't alive in 1993. I'm guessing you were born 1998+.

>>71677294
you are forgetting the inherent post the cinema would apply, like the warmness from the projector lamps and shit.

Saw this in the cinema back then and it was not this washed out on the screen.

These reels were not archival and not manufactured to last, they will degrade rather badly and quickly

>>71682342
Im just writing what the transcribers wrote bro

Does anyone own any actual film prints?