Archived threads in /tv/ - Television & Film - 8963. page

4 hours?

must be Love Exposure

the absolute kinografer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ddvk4aWNS50

>>78906902
South Korea has a President that's an actor? Is he anything like Reagan?

>>78906773
Probably ptsd

>>78906773
He wanted to invent wacky languages everything else is just context

>>78906773
>Start writing about elves and making up fictional languages out of nowhere
now THIS is shitposting. for everyone else, simply google his bio

jfc at those pasted-on heads

and they monkified the hell out of freeman's face kek

>>78906822
>monkified

why is this board so racist wtf

File: t3_tohxa.png (115KB, 1197x353px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 1197x353px

>>78906937
just look at it

looks like those old double nigger /b/ threads

I don't know what this is, but that horse looks way too clean for that situation to the point of disbelief

Did horse dead?

artex my nigga rest in peace

Literally yes. All it was missing was 'A film by the Coen Brothers' on the poster.

No, it was pretty average.

If it was, then 2016 is even worse than I thought.

Your are a pleb it seems

>>78906520
What exactly is the issue with this scene?

>>78906536
Sorrentino pls. Stop browsing /tv/ and get a life

>>78906564
The whole conversation

File: safespace.png (356KB, 487x529px) Image search: [Google]

356KB, 487x529px

good thing Jk Rowling had a change of heart

>>78906462
>we just never saw them

as it should be

File: 1484625944378.jpg (1MB, 1560x2872px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1560x2872px

Harry my boy, did I ever tell you we were in one the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises? Seriously each episode following you - the boy wizard and your pals from Hogwarts Academy as you fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King. He was never a good friend.

File: Literallyvideogametier.webm (3MB, 940x390px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 940x390px

>>78906371
HAHAHHAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAAHHAHAAHAHAHHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAAH

File: 1463462524460.png (749KB, 850x946px) Image search: [Google]

749KB, 850x946px

>be me
>read comics
>have a comic store I frequent
>friends with owner, nice guy
>ask him what he thought about BvS
>"It's too dark! Batman doesn't kill! Superman needs his red trunks back! Why doesn't he smile more often?"
>mfw

Zack, you cast pearls before swine. One day they'll understand.

File: 1485641852568.jpg (428KB, 1738x2133px) Image search: [Google]

428KB, 1738x2133px

>>78906371
Makes Dawn of the Dead, 300, and Watchmen. All enjoyable movies. Then he makes Man of Steel and Batman vs. Superman. Both shit movies. Does not add up.

>Leaving out Sucker Punch
Yes. That was soft-core porn, not a film.

this guy
2008 would be my first choice though/

I wouldn't mind that purely because my grandmother would still be alive and I could hug her once again.

>>78906305
>>78906338
Either would be fine, but I'd much rather go back to 2004. I wasted my youth...

the music video for that song is the most obnoxious shit I've ever seen
fuck america

>that episode where Sid clips through his house and finds out that he is merely a CGI puppet for a children's television show but he can't handle the truth so his parents wipe his memories of the incident
It was pretty dark now that I think about it

Were they supposed to look like they have down syndrome?

That's gay dude don't graffiti on universal studios it's disrespectful

>>78906214
>3.32 mb

>>78906214
Ask if a Sim Dulaney ever worked there, and if he was a good friend

>>78906213
Because Hollywood doesn't want to admit that Blade Runner was an accurate prediction of the late 2010s

>>78906213
I live in l.a.

The sky isn't fuckin black with pollution you mongoloid. You exaggerate.

>>78906213
watch Training day,fag.

No. Hes an independant director without any studio concersn because he produces evrything himself with his own studio.

The movies listed are literally just fun for his kids. He invites all his acting friends and they have a great time and a big BBQ afterwards.

He is a big pulp fan and not only tried making a PROPER John Carter movie but also holds the right for Heavy Metal and Fire and Ice, ready for live action remakes.

Why does he wear a hat 24/7?
Insecure baldlet?

these movies are great for kids and are clearly made for kids

don't see the problem here

also
>dusk till dawn is bad
>spykino is bad

i liked them both to be honest desu

boring desu

>>78906029
Of course. Starry Eyes has good acting and plot development all through the movie. You don't have to sit through an hour of boring shit before anything happens.

>>78905902
Well, he wasn't wrong. Obi-Wan was the first guy to kill a Sith Lord in a thousand years.

>>78905924
Maul was an apprentice. Also Sheev killed Plagueis

>>78905955
>Maul was an apprentice
He is still a sith lord. Darth is short for Dark Lord of the Sith.

>>78905955
>Also Sheev killed Plagueis

Obi-Wan was the first Jedi to kill a Sith in a thousand years.