ITT: Scenes men are allowed to cry
When Hitler died in Inglorious Basterds
Post em faggots
>getting gryffindor
you jelly?
>>78828628
>slytherin
>ok, decent enough
>try to pick the most aggressive shit possible so i dont get a faggy patronus
>get a tabby cat
fuck that website. i'm probably a faggot for doing it anyway.kill me
Let's post the more obscure stuff in our childhood to trigger each others' memories from when we were children and activate some nostalgia.
let's see what shows and movies we saw as kids but completely forgot about until now.
In 1996, as part of a new military training program, a group of orphaned infants are selected at birth and raised as highly disciplined soldiers with no understanding of anything but military routine. They are trained to be ruthless obedient killers, and all those considered to be physically or mentally unworthy are executed. The survivors are turned into impassive dedicated fighting machines with no exposure to or understanding of the outside world.
What was Disney thinking when they made this?
>>78825814
wasn't this show on Cartoon Network? not very obscure at all
Why did the dude like white russians so much? Was he a communist?
He likes milky farts.
they're great.
>>78824856
Because he was baked all the time and White Russians taste like chocolate milkshake whilst still having a high alcohol content.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bl5UH6EZXIM
The previous thread reached bump limit:
>>78821519
>>78824683
I hope they keep making more of these
>>78824683
b-b-but rogue one was a good movie
>>78824683
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bl5UH6EZXIM
UNFUNNY IRONY!
>>78821797
I disagree
Ok
>>78821797
Rogue One was good
YOU JUST KEEP HITTIN' THE FUCKIN' HOME RUNS, DISNEY!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bl5UH6EZXIM&feature=push-u-sub&attr_tag=kGFcIBNx1b0-6
Mike will not let it go.
>>78821519
They are my best virtual friends.
Reddit Cuck Memedia
Our guys.
http://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2017/01/alec-baldwin-host-saturday-night-live-donald-trump
>>78817129
mocking the president is treason and should be treated as such
>>78817129
I haven't heard his impression but fuck me, he's got the look on lock down
>>78817167
>>78817165
But what about obama doe?
The Idiot's Lantern edition
Face erased >>78771965
>>78811153
I ACT WITH MY TEETH
>>78811153
Jeez, series 2 was shit
>>78811258
Why is these three in the wrong houses?
>Harry - clearly Slytherin
>Ron - Obviously hufflepuff
>Hermione - definitely Ravenclaw
also why is Hufflepuff best house?
>Griffindor -chads and normies
>Slytherin - edgelords
>Ravenclaw - fucking nerds
>Hufflepuff bros up for shake n bake
1. Because Rowling can't write and didn't actually write the series
2. Because you're a manchild
>>78810307
>ywn go to hogwarts and be put in hufflepuff
>ywn be best bros with cedric diggory and slay all the qt dopey hufflepuff gash together
dullest franchise, etc
ITT: unintentionally funny moments in movies
Perhaps it was humorous, but know this: you have not redeemed the series. What was this moment but nothing more than a brief moment of unintentional levity in an adaption of one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises? Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.
>>78809010
>>78809207
I'm still laughing. Shit's hilarious.
Previous >>78791207
/ourqueen/ edition
First for Catelyn
Daily reminder that (f)Aegon and Jon Connington will murder Davos' family because they will refuse to bend the knee.
>>78808287
Isn't Davos out on his Rickon adventure when this would take place?
>Authority is not given to you to deny the return of the king, Stuart!
Really broke my immersion. Why give him such a common name in a world filled with so much fantasy?
>>78791580that genuinely made me laugh, well done op
heh
sensible chuckle
Letterboxd thread: post profiles and discuss what you have recently watched
QOTD: which 2017 release do you think will create the biggest letterboxd drama
>>78785508
>which 2017 release do you think will create the biggest letterboxd drama
Star Wars 8, duh
>when you watch just the right movie
/SwimmingPool
>>78785529
Better thread, 2bh
Name a less talented actress
literally impossible
emma watson
Tara Reid