how do you call this hairstyle
>>79169692
the la - z - boy
the chullet
Mullet
So Im not anetflix shillbut this show was actually very funny. I did not like the first few episodes, mostly because they are played out in the trailer, but it grew on me.The dialogue is funny and the characters play well off each other. Am i crazy?
Finally, a reason to post this.
>>79169669
>Am i crazy?
It's a very comfy show
>>79169669
comfy as shit
What does /tv/ think of Tim Heidecker?
>>79169568
Seems like a cuck. Very unfunny, too.
>>79169568
ALIMONY
commie
fag
cuck
sam hyde elevated his post ironic comedy, and he couldnt take it because he was so successful
I dont get the puppy bowl, they aren't even good at it
lets see you fucking try it
>>79169492
>beta tries to hold his own as he's circled by two alphas
>>79169589
They dont respect the sport
Why is there no social media in movies of the future like Star Wars, Star Trek and Blade Runner?
>>79169475
It was banned. They world rejoiced. Social Media is worse than the atomic bomb.
Star Wars was set a long time ago when there was no social media
>>79169475
Because it would break half the plots.
>You have received an instant message from Galen Erso
>"dude just shoot a proton torpedo at the exhaust port"
>movie over
>has done nude scenes
>keep casting her as the heroine in YA adaptations
why is this allowed
She is the definition of average.
>>79169443
wat are you talking about
show proof u libelous cunt
>>79169465
This.
Ever since Jennifer Lawrence made the "quirky, average, talentless, hack" meme Hollywood had been pushing to break into new marketing.
Add into the fact that the highest spending group is women aged 20-35 who also happen to be the larger portion of SJWs, and you're going to see Hollywood flooded with "average" actors who can't act.
>sometimes a lil' "smack" is called for
what did the honorable sir mean by this?
crack got a bad reputation from people overdoing it
it's actually a real gentleman's drug in moderation
good smack in small controlled doses is actually the greatest pleasure this earth has to offer.
>>79169186
There's nothing wrong with hitting a woman open hand, and just once.
THINGS I DIDN'T LIKE:
>cliche music in trailer
>apparently first xenomorph is gonna be a guy infested by a spore
>no helmets on alien planet cause hurrdurr, turned out nicely for the first movie
THINGS I LIKED
>alien
>stupid sexy alien
>goddamnit I want to dick the alien
>it's kinda the point, it's supposed to be sexy
>I still feel guilty
>>79169142
>>no helmets on alien planet cause hurrdurr, turned out nicely for the first movie
that's the engineer home planet you retard, they literally breath the same atmosphere as we do
>>79169173
>therefore it's fine to take off protective gear
>ocean is the same planet where we developed, it's safe to take of breathing apparatus
>volcano caldera is same atmosphere, better take off this helmet
>detroit is fine, I don't need this bulletproof vest
>>79169273
were they in a volcano, the ocean or detroit?
no they weren't, so shut the fuck up
What would you say is his best film?
>>79169126
His first two movies were Rudy and Swingers. I liked him in Old School
>>79169126
True Detective then Into The Wild.
I can't understand why he did shitty comedy for so long.
>>79169194
>dodgeball
>shitty
>The Fast and the Furious
>2 Fast 2 Furious
>The Fast and the Furious: Tokyo Drift
>Fast & Furious
>Fast Five
>Fast & Furious 6
>Furious 7
>The Fate of the Furious
>>79169045
>Faster and Furiouser
>Gotta Go Fast
>Must Go Faster
The fast and the fine
Fast 10 your seatbelts
>>79169045
so you wanted it to be simply 1-7?
dumb frogposter is extra dumb today.
Will it flop?
Nah, first one got over 700 million and no one knew who these faggots were. If the 2nd gets decent reviews(it probably it), gotg 2 will make over 1 billion
Is Yondu /our guy/?
I don't know if these marvel capeshits are capable of flopping anymore
>protagonist is a writer
>>79169000
>protagonist is a disaffected young adult male with no direction in life
>>79169000
Stephen King movies
>Romcom
>Protagonist is an architect
>two girls kidnapped
>both from the same tiny town
>both the same age
>both working in the very same department in the same mall
>"SORRY AGENT COPPER NO CONNECTION BETWEEN THE TWO WE HAVE NO IDEA WHY THE KILLER CHOSE THEM!"
Was Sheriff Truman retarded?
Those are not connections, they are similarities.
>>79169147
>working in the same place
>not a connection
are you retarded?
lynch makes everything campy on purpose so he can forget about sloppy writing
it's a pretty neat trick desu
>when you realize harry potter series it's not based on a true story
dullest
>>79168958
waiting for dullest franchise copypasta
>when you realize hairy pooter is the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises.
For real each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.
Hnnnnggggg
>nulara
disgusting
I could beat that girl in a fight