is this show any good?
no show is good
>>79218092
Yes. Its the spiritual successor to The Simpsons.
>>79218174
I think you mean Home Movies and Dr Katz.
So tell me anon, what turns you?
u
this was a very bad flick
truly an insult to humanity and bygone era it tries to emulate
Mildly attractive women
Mildly attractive women with dicks
Nothing needed sometimes
Why did a Frenchman drink tea?
the same reason he spoke with a British accent
>you need a reason to drink tea
it's not even a plant typical of the UK
>>79218014
We drink more than the French though
We can all agree that this is the absolute worst South Park episode, right?
There are seasons worth of episodes that are worse than the one you posted
Did you watch this latest season at all? Every episode is a contender.
>>79217892
dunno man
some of the s3-4 eps where pretty sloppy and forgettable.
last season was unapologetically mediocre
>Sweetness in the Belly
>>79217851
Sweetness as in african cum
>>79217851
It's not even out yet. Can we please stop having these stupid threads until it's actually released? Then we can pick it apart instead of autistically screeching.
>>79217902
Where do you think we are?
this is the perfect movie right?
>>79217809
Its one of the few solid trilogies
memes aside, it's reddit.
>>79217809
No its literally overrated as fuck on here. Get over it, its not that good.
Reddit as fuck you tourists
Just watched the first episode. Awful.
>there's no reason for these to be the Archie characters besides shock value
>"Are you familiar with Truman Capote? I'm Breakfast at Tiffany's, and this place is In Cold Blood." There's a bunch of stupid lines like that
>all characters look like they're 25
>le "we can't tell anyone what we heard because of what we were doing" trope, how original
>the evil redhead has literally no personality other than being a cliche movie bitch
>Jughead is played by Cody from the Disney Channel (you know he's Jughead because he has the hat)
>the digital cinematography looks sterile, and the green filters they put over certain scenes are trash
I kind of liked it. Will probably watch episode two tomorrow.
Then why did you call it awful and only list negative things?
This show is the work of greedy jews.
>>79217836
It was awful, and there were many negative things. I enjoyed it, but only as a guilty pleasure. I want to know what happens next, even though the first episode had a lot of stupid parts.
>the best child actor from the Harry Potter movies is relegated to capeshit on the CW
>one of the worst child actors from the Harry Potter movies is doing big budget Disney shit and turning down Oscar bait
The fuck?
You just know he's giving Killer Frost the Draco
Thats what you get for doing a fucking planet of the apes flick
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gs3IRbg17Y0
>>79217773
But those are great flicks.
So, this was surprisingly great, fun TV.
Felt very similar to the original - even recycling a lot of the usual 24 tropes - but not n a way that felt repetitive...more of a nostalgic nod.
Why are the critics all angry and outraged about it?
Because 24 isn't liberal enough.
>>79217650
>why are the (((critics))) all angry
Because they dared show brown and black villains. Note that this is rarely ever done anymore on TV - and on the rare occasion it is, the hand wringing and wailing begins from (((them)))).
Forget the fact that we have a black hero etc...
he looks like fuckin candyman
HOT MEAL
>>79217599
This meme was quaint enough, but it never really had legs, tbph.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wwo8qxUit00
>>79217677
Tell that to Kanja Club.
worth a watch?
I've read like 2/3 of the books but it was so long ago I barely remember anything
>>79217542
I watch just for Patrick Warburtons dick
I'm watching it now. I watched about 10 minutes the night it was released and was kind of disgusted by the bizarrely comical tone and the terrible lighting, so I turned it off.
I started watching again today and I found it a lot more palatable once I understood the tone they were going for.
So it's pretty good. It's funny, they're sticking to the books, and they're setting things up very well. I have two big problems with it. First, way too comical. Even when dark things are happening, it plays itself like a parody of Wes Anderson and just comes off as excessively whimsical. The 2004 film went a little too far in the other direction, but at least it wasn't afraid of actually having some tonal variation and being genuinely dramatic. Second, NPH is honestly just garbage. He tries, he tries so hard, but he's just not intimidating or scary. He's a thin guy with a high voice. Even when he's not wearing a costume, it doesn't feel like he's a real person (he's not; NPH is wearing prosthetics). Again, Carrey just matches the role better; his problem was having a bad script to work with.
So yeah. It's pretty good. I'm having fun watching it.
>>79217769
Oh yeah and I also miss Emily Browningfu
IS THIS REAL OR NOT?
Yeah, either get dubs or get out
>>79217431
/tv/ has disabled dubs, dumbass...
US: Yes
Rest of world: No
You give them an inch, they take a mile
Well /tv/?
>>79217382
slow people in front of me
>>79217412
I'll add something similar: People who take more than 20 seconds to order at the drivethru in the morning. If you're ordering more than coffee, fuck off and go order inside.
Literally every single person that shares a hobby with me. Can't stand being around any of them.
Also people who drink smelly soups in public.
What do we think of this?
>>79217351
Dishonest cinema
It practices dihonest film making
>>79217360
>>79217364
What did they mean by this?
>In his review, Nathan Rabin of The A.V. Club created the term "Manic Pixie Dream Girl" to describe the "bubbly, shallow cinematic creature" stock character type that he stated Dunst plays in the film.
What's the earliest known example of MPDG in film?
Jeanne Moreau in Jules and Jim?
Audrey in Tiffany's
Any role Zooey Deschanel has played really.