Archived threads in /tv/ - Television & Film - 7199. page

The Exam

Sex and the City 2

Dark Knight Returns

>>80734111
Nice trips!

>Ninja Storm blue's skirt and exposed silver leggings
Confession, I masturbated to the suit so many times when I was younger

File: 1360595155677.jpg (6KB, 250x167px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 250x167px

>robbery
>chat immediately spams TriHard

>>81070244
300. I was 8. Shit lit me the fuck up.

File: 5a1e5ae0d8674ef6b73a537772d2dbe2.jpg (347KB, 1536x864px) Image search: [Google]

347KB, 1536x864px

I saw >>81070333
Still have nightmares about the trips

File: 1475218512432.jpg (80KB, 400x568px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 400x568px

Christianity still hasn't recovered.

>>81070194
a man for all seasons

The ones of you and your pastor that he has locked in a safe in his room are pretty good imo

>>80733445
>we
fuck off newfag

>>80733445
They can be as big as the plot demands.

>>80733445
They said kong was young, and would grow much bigger

I like it. A lot of episodes are pretty milquetoast commentary, but it's a nice way to watch a b-movie without having to slog through it alone. Would you guys log those "MST3K" episodes on Letterboxd or the actual film that was showcased?

Yo hit a nibba up with some recs

What Lynch flicks are worth watching and which should I skip? I've only seen Blue Velvet and Mulholland Drive

>>81069634

If Hillary Clinton said that she likes to grab underage boys by the penis against their will and got elected, comedians would be making jokes about it forever.

>only joke we got
>makes an embarrassment of himself and the country in new ways on a weekly basis at least

I honestly did forget about that but thanks for reminding me. Lol 2016 was the best current year ever

The existence of this movie makes me extremely angry

>>81069616
I loved Life when it was called Mission to Mars

>>81069616
in a valley of violence

>>81069491
Why do so many black people make up all these reasons to divide themselves further and further? It's fucking crazy.

We wuz slaves but they be kings but we was kings befo

>>81069552
Liberals always have to be the victims

>>81069288
>But my life is good! Really good! I get to wake up every morning, at 5AM, and make some soup! It's the best. I love it. I get to lay in a bed, all by myself, all of my life! That's fantastic!

;_;

File: _Aremond_.jpg (22KB, 300x279px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 300x279px

>>81069288
>this was one of Armond White's favorite movies of 2006

THE ABSOLUTE MAD CRITIC

Why didn't Nacho tell him that they were the lord's chips?

>>81069177

It's not just consecutive flops. It factors in number of hits, expectations for each film, etc. It's possible for an actor to have a string of underperforming flops without a second thought, but it can take as little as one to wreck a career. There are a lot of different qualities actors have, and one of the most important is the mystical "box-office draw". This relates to how many tickets will be sold just based on a particular actor (or sometimes director or writer's) presence. Consider the case of Taylor Lautner.

He was in the phenomenally successful Twilight movies, and was pulling in MTV movie awards, all kinds of stuff. As he had a vocal fanbase, it was assumed that he was a draw, so he got cast in a lot of movies with the assumption that they could put him on a poster in a lobby and sell millions of tickets. Wasn't the case, and as soon as people figured out that this crappy actor wasn't able to convert his "fans" into ticket buyers, he became the youngest member of the JUST Adam Sandler movie crowd. Brendan Fraser suffered from a lot of the same fall. It was assumed that he could open a movie, that people would line up to see whatever new movie had Brendan Fraser on the poster. Once they realized that wasn't the case, his career imploded.

Box-Office Draw is only a consideration for "movie star" actors like Fraser, Taylor Lautner, Tom Cruise, etc. People who are more popular than they are good, not saying that Cruise is bad, just that he's really, really popular. Actual actors worry get hired for performances rendered more so than box-office draw. No amount of flops is going to hurt Steve Buscemi or Gary Oldman's career. It was never assumed that you'd make a hundred million just because Gary Oldman is in your movie.

>>81069433
You seem to know about this shit.

>>81069177
I just wanted to mention the guy who played gambit in one of the wolverine movies and that guy who goes to Mars.

He was cool as a footballer in Friday Night Lights.

File: passengers-367242067-large.jpg (104KB, 810x1200px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 810x1200px

>>81069537

For a real case study in box-office draw, consider the movie Passengers.

JLaw's coming off that Hunger Games series, which brought a whole lot of people to the theater, and she won an Oscar. Chris Pratt was in Jurassic World and Guardians. Between the two of them, this movie had expectations through the roof. Two young stars with box-office draw? That's why the poster has just both of their faces. The whole selling point was "come see this movie for these people".

They both should be pretty scared right now. It cost like $110 million to make, but it's maxing out at around $99 million. It opened at #3, with like $14 million for the weekend. That means that either Chris Pratt or Jennifer Lawrence can't open a movie, or that one can and the other is so toxic that it discourages people from going. Either way, there's something very, very fishy going on.

A performance like that will hurt both of their careers a lot more than a Tom Hardy movie that nobody goes to see would hurt his. It was never assumed or claimed that Tom Hardy could open a movie, and he wouldn't ever get thrown in front of a $100+ million dollar movie with the expectation that you could market it as "that movie with Tom Hardy in it," the way that Passengers was "that Chris Pratt and JLaw movie."

>>81069129

By the guy who also directed Suicide Squad

Small world of 'talent'

>>81069129

SO many fucking reasons to hate this movie. I know I've listed at least 20 major suckage reasons on this board before so won't waste my efforts repeating myself, but TRUST US, it sucks.

>>81069129
it's a typical plebwar 2 movie, more perfectly generic that every other generic iteration that has come before it, like a perfect craft of genericness with all the tired tropes and plotpoints you've come to expect

>>81068548
>doing capeshit and trash flicks
>Based Casey Affleck doing masterpiece after masterpiece
>N-NO BUT I'M NOT CLAPPING LOOK AT MEEEEE
What a fucking retarded worthless slut

>>81068609
she's a cute though

the epitome of butterface

fucking spread

that outfit damn
Amy was so fucking hot

File: is he ok.png (237KB, 616x596px) Image search: [Google]

237KB, 616x596px

Thaaaat's Gareth!

>>81068356
Less funny, more kino

>>81068356
>part 2 next week

he might end up being number one since his fall off a golf cart wasnt shown in opart 1

not anything as overtly funny as ITS FRIED but lots of little things that add up so far

>>81068439

Dragon unleashing was pretty fucking good