>Newspaper photo of criminal is a shot taken from one of the movie's scenes
>>83904423
>Newspaper picture of a bearded muslim shooter is a silhouette of a shaven white man
>>83904423
unironically name 1 movie where this happens
>>83904423
>>83904550
Didn't think so. Fucking coward.
Name a better actor
For you
>>83904416
>>83904416
Name an actor, any actor
Have you thought about it today?
imagine the precedent that will be set if he is convicted of having his dick drive a woman to suicide
>>83904148
i hate these pics of jim especially after knowing what he done to that girl, talking about sex over her dead dad, telling her he is her daddy, asking her about his cock when she mentioned her dead parents, fucking her, giving her STIs and causing her suicide. She was a baby when he was a funny celebrity, she probably always looked up to him , he took advantage and she killed herself cause of him.
>>83904148
yes jim
which one of you shits made this page?
kikebook.com/koolkinokorner
>>83904067
Wow OP are you autistic enough to promote your own page?
>>83904067
You did.
OP is probably a newfag
Why was Koksal Baba in Twin Peaks?
>>83904041
no you got it confused. it was joe rogan.
>>83904041
To fund his revoltion to rule Turkey from the shadows.
ITT: shows that everyone forgot about
was it kino?
Who was in the wrong here?
>>83903799
The downies were cunts.
>>83903799
Can we PLEASE have one more Inbetweeners movie? I want to see them catching up together at a pub to discuss being adults and working and getting married before going on a bender and fucking shit up.
>>83906398
so you mean The World's End but with the Inbetweeners characters?
no
only the first film was good, second one was shite
http://comicbook.com/marvel/2017/06/13/marvels-the-inhumans-trailer-hits-the-web
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
*breathe in*
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>83903777
>he does not know Lockjaw
Pleb
low IQ OP
>>83903777
Black Bolt with a suit on? LAME
Black Bolt without a tuning fork? DOUBLE LAME
Why didn't he just go find another pair of glasses?
>>83903749
A rather arduous task for a nearly blind man in a nuclear wasteland.
Also I'm pretty sure glass isn't sturdy enough to withstand a hydrogen bomb.
>>83903749
how do you break your glasses when you only have one pair and are the last man alive with all the books
how do you not plan for this and keep a backup pair
>>83904274
Everybody kept nagging him and bothering him so he didn't have the time
That scene in Life wherethe alien hurtles into the soyuz and starts ripping the cosmonauts apart
really stuck with me, it still comes to mind months later. I don't know why that scene in particular.
>>83903733
This movie was shitty and all because it didn't feel like an authentic space and astronaut movie. We have live feeds of astronauts, we have tons of documentation for what it's like up there, and this shit felt like it was pulled out of someone's ass who couldn't be bothered to do basic research
>all the counter-measures fail
>turns out a woman planned them
brilliant
>>83903733
I didn't get that scene
why were there cosmonauts
How did they get there
anybody watching 2nd season?
Why is it okay for wizards to perform Unbreakable Vows as if they are nothing while the Unforgivable Curses land you instantly in prison? Even if it was a way to show Snape was more of a good guy it was still incredibly cheap.
If only JK Rowling had been thrown in prison for creating one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least the books were good though
"No!" The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.
Alright then, let’s get down to business. In regards to the OP, wouldn’t you perform unforgivable curses randomly in plain sight too if you were forced to watch, let alone star in, an adaption of one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises? Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.
Only two more days until the summer of Seagalkino begins. Are you ready for the hottest film of the year?
MIKE TYSON
STEVEN SEAGAL
WARRING TELECOM COMPANIES
https://youtu.be/AMiaXULFpLw
GOFIRE
Holy shit, Seagal is fat. Is he supposed to be an actual competitive combatant for Mike Tyson or is this some kind of joke?
I've honestly never seen a Seagal film but I'm certain he was never fat. How is he an action star still?
*sends you back to Russia*
>good guy teams up with bad guy to take on worse guys
>>83903377
>thread gets derailed because dubs
>>83903377
My favorite trope.
Second favorite is bitter enemies forced to cooperate in hostile environment.
/co/ but...
>>83903377
>finally trap Mordru
>bad guy shows up and wreck LOSH's shit
>"fuck, this guy's too much, maybe Mordru can do it"
>release Mordru
>he bodies the new guy
>he fucks the universe again
When will these shits learn?