Archived threads in /tv/ - Television & Film - 3669. page

I attempted suicide after seeing that scene for the first time
no joke

File: 1488511433622.jpg (30KB, 850x432px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 850x432px

>>84630904

>>84630904
CTHULHU IM COMING FOR YOU MOTHERFUCKER

Me too. Sequel when

Its not even hated, just no one cares. Like, at all.

this film angers and confuses the eternal roaches

>>84630775

Zardoz

>>84630775

End Of Evangelion

The Pest.

>>84630704
I've been trying to remember the god damn name of this movie for so God damn long.
I could only remember the scene where the two of them are singing together while she's holding the shotgun watching him sitting in front of the house.
The little girl comes down the stairs with a candle, illuminating the scene as he disappears (you can see him moving as she enters the scene). Excellent shit.

cult film simply for great performance. Use of lighting top notch for film then

Has its problems, some acting is awful and script is quite dogshit

The definition of kino.

>>84630627
Blast from the past 1999

File: ekVr5ue.jpg (42KB, 547x471px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 547x471px

>>84630627
Big fish
In the name of the father
Caravan of courage: An ewok adventure.

>>84630627

>inb4 someone asks why

why are you going to prison?

Watch "lets go to prison"

>>84630470
What did he mean by this?

>>84630521
he belongs in the air

>>84630521
That windows 98 can defeat computers which can traverse solar systems with ease.

>>84630194
Stop posting about your shitty show John, it was cancelled for a reason. Go finish Cans Without Labels already you've been working on that shitty little short for five years now.

>>84630194
Bbrrrrrraaaaaapppp

>it was cancelled for a reason

what reason?

>>84629510
Wouldn't be made

>>84629531
/thread sadly

>>84629510
It was panned in its time (fact)

>>84629369
Shit's gonna be straight up kino; got a standing ovation at SXSW. Can't fucking wait.

>>84629405
SXSW is pleb central though, they'll give a standing ovation to anything.

>>84629405
I just reread the book for like the 4th time in anticipation

Considering rewatching Neighbors but fuck me was it rough the first time through

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PH-PAaHnnMg

>>84629353
Woah, Joke- I mean Jared Leto is completely D A M A G E D!

>>84629371
any backstory on why dr phil was being such a jerk from the get go

This was the result of someone reading about Aokigahara and deciding that what one of the most naturally creepy places on the planet really needed was a lame-ass American adaptation full of unnecessary supernatural bullshit and terrible dialogue.

>>>>CAN'T BE SCARY WITHOUT GHOSTS RIGHT

File: Bad horror.png (266KB, 635x1432px) Image search: [Google]

266KB, 635x1432px

>>84629352
Didn't see it, but was it worse than Blair Witch?

File: 59e60d645b9e483daae0cfa436b20602[1].jpg (1MB, 2000x3000px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2000x3000px

>>84629460
The other Aokigahara movie released last year was pretty terrible too.

>>84629029
Good question OP, and kudos for trying to start a legit discussion /tv/ related. board is shit tonight
>inb4 it's like this every night

To your question, and I can only speak for myself, but I don't know how I couldn't have judged TPM without the context of hype, its place in the saga, etc. I don't think I have a refined enough critique to be able to judge something like that in a vacuum.

But for something like a Polanski film or Godard, I don't even really know what Polanski did or was accused of doing and this is the first time I have heard anything about transgressions of Godard. I could watch their movies without considering anything bad they've done IRL.

But I also think a lot of art these days is meant by their creators to actually be judged and viewed and interpreted not only as the work itself, but the entire process, person/people, and circumstances around the creation of it.

>>84629029
>Do all films deserve to be criticized in a vacuum?
>is it fair to critique The Phantom Menace by placing it in the context of it being the fourth film in a six-part saga and it first premiering with the culmination of 16 years of intense hype? Or should it only be judged on its merits as an individual, audio-visual work of art?
I think it's about finding a balance. TPM is a prequel to a beloved trilogy and deserves to be seen as such. However, it's also important to acknowledge the years between the films and the current state of cinema.
Like, if it doesn't quite fit in with the visual style, I think that's okay. But if it's doing really silly things with the plot that reflect poorly on the originals, then that's not okay. For example, making everything much brighter and more colourful - fine. More CGI and less practical effects - fine. Making Anakin the creator of C3PO and throwing in several jokes about farting and defecation - not fine.

>is it fair to critique any of Jean-Luc Godard's, Roman Polanski's, Woody Allen's, or David Lynch's films without taking into consideration the IRL transgressions of their directors?
Yeah, absolutely. Same goes with the Hacksaw Ridge controversy. Gibson made an excellent film. You can like his work while still acknowledging that that the director is a piece of shit. If I ever saw Bill Cosby IRL I wouldn't bother asking him for an autograph or saying hello to him, but that doesn't mean I'm going to boycott all of his standup that ever made me laugh.

I deliberately try not to know anything about a film behind-the-scenes stuff until I actually watch the film. I even usually watch trailers for films after I've seen the film.

>>84629029
Well I think there's sort of a balance. Obviously you have to take into account those things, because it's nearly impossible to separate them especially if the movie makes reference to specific aspects of the real world. But at the end of the day, you do have to judge the films themselves. It's nearly impossible to critique them in a total vacuum because objectivity is impossible.

>>84630398
Polanski anally raped a 14 year old. And then he fled the country to avoid consequences for it.

Easily not grooming a replacement for Friends. Going from the number 1 network to last place in 5 years should be enough to get you fired. #2 isn't an issue. I hate reality shows but they're cheap and fast and easy to replace. Then when you strike gold you're ecstatic. #3 was the perfect PR disaster bookend for Jeff Zucker's reign of ineptitude.

>>84628821
>>84629097
>no next Friends
given how many shows get cancelled after 1 or 2 seasons I don't believe anyone can produce the next hit at will

canceling law and order

it just needed 1 more season to be the longest running show on television

>>84628587
Camp night moon is gonna be a camp night...MARE!

>>84628419
imagine how her pusy smells like after a long day of shooting imagine!

>>84628419
Well she can't act, so hopefully nothing

Femlet tamer role.

Never watched her Fast & Furious now I'm curious.