>movie ends with blooper reel
>shows how directors and actors don't take the movie very seriously
Is there anything more cancerous than this?
>Animation movie
>Bloopers
http://www.theonion.com/blogpost/i-only-like-movies-where-the-whole-cast-dances-in--38502
>>85038974
he hated quips
>>85038974
Ended up in the wrong comic movieverse.
>>85038974
He wanted daddys love
ACTING
>>85038919
It's stylistically designed to be that way.
>>85039001
Oh shut up, George.
>>85039001
So it's stylistically designed to be as awful as possible?
What is /tv/'s opinion of Cory in the House?
Electing Cory was the biggest mistake we ever made as a nation. Yeah his catch-phrases were cute, he made us all laugh, but that's not enough to run the richest nation on Earth, come on guys. It's time to just admit that we fucked up, and figure out how to get Cory out of the house.
>>85038344
Cory 2020
Kino
Can we all agree that these three movies are the best action blockbusters of the last ten years?
>>85038157
sorry but i hate Transformers, and i will never watch it
>>85038256
Bay is objectively a genius
>>85038886
A genius at directing or a genius at making money?
This seems to be a hot topic right now, are you in favour of it, or no?
>>85037955
The real reason so few actors of colour were in the original was because they were the only ones fine with his blaringly obvious racism
I don't understand why they feel the need to change the races of established characters. These are works of fiction, you should be able to create a compelling character that stands on their own merit. Instead of race changing already established characters for 'Diversity' points. Diversity for the sake of Diversity is just stupid.
>>85037955
Oh, I'm in favor of diversity
I'm just against forced memes and diversity to please retarded sjw (((critics))) and characters that do not bring anything useful to a plot except for the diverse color of their skin
I'm also against shitty castings with ugly people who cant act.
Bring me good characters who look nice, can act and you can care for them in a plot that makes some actual fucking sense and I don't give a damn if they're all niggers, I will call it kino.
For me personally, anything below 95% would solidify the fact that critics are unfairly biased against Nolan, simply because they aren't smart enough to understand his work.
Could go either way depending on how much they care about muh diversity.
>>85037892
99%
>this thread again
Why OP is so obsessed with Nolan?He' another MCUck butthurt about TDK being more praised than Iron Man 1?
http://www.vulture.com/2017/07/colin-trevorrow-insists-hes-the-best-director-for-star-wars.html
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/colin-trevorrow-defends-star-wars-episode-ix-directing-gig-book-henry-reviews-1021534
> "And I need to make a film that you’ll appreciate, even if your experience with it was different, which is making something that will be deeply emotionally resonant and satisfying for people all around the world. And I think about it a lot."
Yes man confirmed. He's just a set puppet making generic committee designed blockusters. He did it for Spielberg, He's doing it for Kennedy.
>>85037349
>He went on to stress that filmmaking for him is a team effort. "There tends to be a lot of assumptions made about control, but the reality is, it’s a collaboration," he said.
Yes Man Trevarrow
>>85037349
>"It’s not me locked in a room with the producers trying to get in and me saying, ‘I’m making my decisions!’ It is a much more collaborative process. I think that except for very, very rare circumstances, there is no such thing as final cut anymore. And I think the best-case scenario for any film is that the producer and the writer and the director are all on the same page and making the same movie."
Lol, is this his way of communicating that he's on a leash?
>>85037349
>I need to make a film that you’ll appreciate
Great, go do that, cool, but maybe don't use Star Wars to work out your issues. As it is, 9 is destined to be the weakest of the trilogy. J World was a rudderless CGI trifle, and if this new film is so bad, i don't know what the Mouse is thinking. Fire him, keep Rian on.
The Mummy was pure kino for cutie lovers. Also, I disagree with the overwhelmingly negative reception. It was perfectly serviceable as an action adventure "horror" romp. It was less outright campy but it had all the quips you could ever need, very tacticool "Uncharted" feel at the start especially. So yeah, the film is paint by numbers and tries to have mass easy appeal in how it approaches things... But aspects of the Mummy and her powers were very cool and she was 110% cutie waifu. The scene with "Seth" or whatever the lurching bizarre psychological horror monster in the prologue was, I thought that was very cool. I kept rooting for Ahmanet the entire time, she was great. She went above and beyond saving our boy Cruise so many times, that idiot didn't even know how hard she worked for her Chosen. My only real complaint about the film as a package is poor sweet Mummyfu getting cuckolded by "Jenny" time and time again.The final scene with the massive sandstorm trailing off Cruise's galloping horse (and his alone) was very neat. Could have had an even more bombastic and typical final shot by showing his face imposed in the cloud "roaring" you know? Classic Mummy stuff.
Considering these same critics eat up Marvel shlock and other garbage without a second thought, something so mass-produced as that, the complaints about this film ring so very, very hollow.
tl;dr talk about both The Mummy (2017) and "The Mummy" aka Sofia aka literally perfect Mummyfu
>>85037346
I'm with you OP. Tom phoned it in but Crowe was great, looking forward to seeing more of the Dark Universe. The only problem I had with it was
>it was a different time
Why would she use this expression?
>>85037346
Anybody knows anything about the "Dark Universe?
Will we have more mummy waifukino or she's done in the franchise storyline?
It was an ok movie asides Sofia being a qt, so if she doesn't come back I don't see a good reason to remain interested.
>>85037680
Since they made a point of showing them putting mercury back into her body as opposed to her being destroyed completely, she'll definitely be back.
>>85037680
>Depp
>Cruise
>Crowe
>Bardem
Going to make for some good flicks. Did you not like Crowe's Jekyll/Hyde?
How could anyone hate this movie? It's so much fun, Raimi is a master filmmaker.
This movie sucks and you're gay for liking it
>>85038008
lol
>>85036709
I rewatched it and love/ hate James frankos performance. Just look at that face.
Sup /tv/, 30 yr old neet virgin loser here.
What are some movies where the protagonist is a failure or fails in his mission. I need something to relate to an alleviate my suffering. I've already seen Citizen Kane and The Man Who Wasn't There. Any recommendations? No happy endings, folks.
melancholia: marriage is worse than the apocalypse - the movie.
bonus - everybody dies
Any William Friedkin film
The Fire Within (Louis Malle) was made for you then.
Name one movie thatI can watch tonight.
Novecento
>>85036500
The Guest (2014), top kino.
s
>one 4 minute battle in the beginning
>2 hours of filling
>last 20 minutes is humans fighting some other unknown human army for some unknown reason
>everyone blows up then gets covered by an avalanche
>little girl enriched by monkey BBC
>the end
what the FUCK HOW DID THEY MAKE 2 epic movies then fuck it up on 3???? there is no fucking war?????
at least the CGI was great. That kept me entertained and distracted from all the plot holes
>>85036413
>scene at the end
>caesar yells "fuck trump, and fuck white people" before blowing up an entire wall
was that really necessary?
>>85036413
Fuck off brainlet. Back to your capeshit
If you could put the mind of another actor or actress in her body, which would you choose, and why?
>>85035619
Mia Malkova
>>85035619
Sylvester Stallone
desu anyone would make for a better actor anyway so it doesn't matter
Say what you want about the "Amazing Spider-Man" films. But you have to admit the CGI is leagues ahead of Homecoming.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WfV-0Yv5vNY
>>85035476
Even the CGI in Raimi's trilogy was better 90% of the time
How does a three year old by the same company surpass the new one in look and feel? What the fuck happened? You had Disney behind this project and yet it still looks like shit.
>>85035611
Disney movies have a bigger draw so they can put less effort in and cut costs at no detriment to the number of viewers