Archived threads in /tv/ - Television & Film - 2905. page

>>85115729
What were you thinking by not using the catalog?:

>>85106898
>>85109928
>>85112682

I hope they lose viewers because of this shit

I noticed that the other guy speaking was the kid from "This is England" because he looks exactly like he did in that movie.

I hated Kim so fucking much. Her getting a CTU job was the worst thing ever in any show.

>>85115802
>mountain lion

>>85115892
>show jumps the shark halfway through the first of nine seasons

Ahahaha! I get it!
upbt!^

>>85115565
What kind of fucking name is "Day Time Night Time"? And why do they both have the same name?

>store's left levels drop

File: 'Around_the_World_in_Eighty_Days'_by_Neuville_and_Benett_04.jpg (155KB, 477x700px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 477x700px

Has there ever been a good adaptation of around the world in 80 days?

>>85115611
the one i just posted you pleb

>>85116029
That isn't a cartoon about cats?

File: 745.png (86KB, 200x193px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 200x193px

>>85115384
>native american lead in a british tv show

>>85115453
hey no9w!!! it could happen!!

>>85115384
Listen up, sweeties. You won't have your precious Star Trek for long. We already have your Star Wars, your Ghostbusters, your Harry Potter, and your Doctor Who. They're all going to beautiful and FEMALE, honey.

>>85115228
Im sorry you still need to depend on other people's opinions to rate a movie.

If only you knew how much of a retard it makes you look to even read critics.

They are all shills, they all play for their team PERIOD.

>>85115228
All his movies get high scores when they first come out, then people rewatch them and see all the hilarious mistakes and plotholes.
I'm going to wait until the dust has settled.

File: ourguy.jpg (32KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 1280x720px

>>85115329
Its inevitable seeing as this guy was in the trailer

Cherry picking, suppressing evidence, or the fallacy of incomplete evidence is the act of pointing to individual cases or data that seem to confirm a particular position, while ignoring a significant portion of related cases or data that may contradict that position. It is a kind of fallacy of selective attention, the most common example of which is the confirmation bias.[1][2] Cherry picking may be committed intentionally or unintentionally. This fallacy is a major problem in public debate.[3]

>>85115225
yeah but all of the Moffat Doctor Who seasons were above average for television dramas

File: prisoner.jpg (94KB, 1445x1080px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 1445x1080px

*enters your safe space*

>>85115034

If you aren't going to go back, then at least use the catalog:
>>85106898
>>85109928
>>85112682

How come the dr. who threads have 300 replies but on 40 unique IPs?

>hero saves somebody's life
>that person will die someday anyway

Damn Geordi looks like THAT?

Do you follow levar burtens Instagram? All he does is post pictures of his dinner

>>85114972
DON'T RAINBOW REED ME NIGGA

Same as every Joaquin shitfest

>>85114374
Atomic Blonde...two more weeks

Other than that, I guess Valerian and Blade Runner

There are literally no movies coming out that I am hyped for. This hasn't changed in ten years now

File: define_diverse.jpg (78KB, 640x687px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 640x687px

GET HYPE