Archived threads in /tv/ - Television & Film - 2737. page

>>85245618

see you tomorrow dude

Goodbye. I hope you manage to stay away for good

>>85245618
Jump off the nearest overpass and do a flip.

>>85245592
Two Lane blacktop

>>85245592
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yK93wVyV8Ts

>>85245592
The Way staring Martin Sheen was pretty good as a road-trip hiking film.
I actually did the walk they do in the film, it's a pretty fun walk across Spain.

complete bastardization of the excellent first game
>lets cut the roster/move list/customization and just throw robots at everything until everyone is bored

>>85246100
To be fair, it does include some good characters that weren't in the first, like Venom, Green Goblin and the Hulk

>>85246247
venom and the hulk were in the first one and you could pick up enemies and swing them around like weapons shit was dope

Reminder that Die Hard 3 would have never been done today because it portdays a black man as racist

Other than Die Hard what are some other Bruce Willis kinos you would recommend?

>he will never say "Welcome to the party, pal!" as you arrive to his houseparty

Virgin stride lmao

>>85535486
its called i killed my father just cause to sharpen my edgyness

File: tilted.jpg (125KB, 522x669px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 522x669px

The Tilted Mind

>>85245241
I see ya! Laughin' and Lying! Scamperin' and Scurryin'!

File: Leon.jpg (392KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

392KB, 1280x720px

GET IN THAT ASS LARRY

shes got a tickle in her anus

huh? what?

>>85245417
Sorry. The guy that had this thread last night. I was wondering if he had some closure

>>85203983

>>85245572
It was an interesting topic, it's Just crazy how high the budget was for these movies were, Either from money laundering or Wasted spending; the Salaries were oddly strange and the casting choices had people who were connected financially.

>>85245169

I bet she has a nice, musty pussy. Hairy girls always do. Pheromones and shit.

Why am so getting a boner. How old is she ?

>>85245414
How new are you

File: take-shelter-movie-jessica-chastain-michael-shannon-10.jpg (290KB, 1280x544px) Image search: [Google]

290KB, 1280x544px

>>85535395
i thought she was MUMMY in take shelter

File: 1495341871253.png (1MB, 700x6975px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 700x6975px

did somebody say mommy thread

>mommyfluid

>>85535284
bump

tim heidecker is a cuck loser trying to stay relevent with shitty netflix sponsored "art" comedy.

it's a big fat meme and you fell for it

>>85537028
the movie came out 5 years ago.

File: The Time Has Come.png (63KB, 1000x920px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 1000x920px

>It’s routine to describe battle films as “anti-war,” still, that misnomer doesn’t describe Dunkirk — the apolitical Nolan transforms the “anti-war” genre into his patented “life is cheap” genre. Each sequence that details the brutal tragedy of warfare is punishing yet remote. Men caught in numerous doom-laden catastrophes are presented IMAX-size for no other reason than shock, discomfort, and the awe of action-addicted filmgoers — adolescents who are temperamentally distanced from how those experiences shaped modern Western culture.

>Nolan exploits technology for effect, not to enrich history. Unlike Ang Lee’s very fine Iraq War drama, Billy Lynn’s Long Halftime Walk, which used 3-D to explore the depths of brotherhood and the war’s emotional complexities, Nolan’s movie flaunts empty violence. Duty is depicted as futile, and despite parroting Churchill’s spiritual motivation against darkness, Nolan typically evokes nihilism without any follow-through. Dunkirk feels dispassionate; it caters to pampered Boomers who never fought for or believed in a war or military service. Note the civilian armada approaching their countrymen: Each face is expressionless. Is this because Nolan rejects emotion, or does patriotic fervor embarrass him?

File: White expresses disgust.jpg (14KB, 600x560px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 600x560px

>It’s possible that Nolan, having created an audience of Millennial pessimists, is uninterested in the fellow feeling that Ang Lee made so intimate and that Clint Eastwood’s Sully and Mel Gibson’s Hacksaw Ridge made affecting as well as spectacular. Nolan misuses the big screen the same way Paul Thomas Anderson did in The Master — as a fanboy selling tool but not for aesthetic exploration. Nolan emphasizes large-scale violence then looks past its effect as he always does — as in that inept football-stadium bombing in The Dark Knight Rises. Dunkirk is equally repellent when Nolan toys with anonymous men trapped in the hull of a ship, helplessly watching bullet holes pierce their safety, or when a pilot nearly drowns as his plane sinks into rising waters. These sitting-duck moments are not suspenseful but torturous, whereas the great action directors — Eisenstein, Peckinpah, Lean, De Palma, Spielberg, Kurosawa, Hitchcock, Abel Gance, Walter Hill, Bay at his best — could all depict action to get at a viewer’s understanding of fate. They mastered narrative and existential coherence. Nolan’s visual language is full of gaps; its pretense at Alain Resnais–style time-shifting seems some kind of joke when a director can’t accomplish straightforward storytelling.

>Dunkirk has been made without wartime sympathy. That’s why the Churchill speech comes off as unconvincing and sappy. Nolan’s detached style mocks the populism that relates to average-grunt, working-joe service; it continues the attitude of Nineties indie filmmakers who chose cynicism over sentiment, anti-Western subversion over jingoism.

File: Hackus Nolantus.jpg (58KB, 465x317px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 465x317px

>>For those with movie memories, hearing the Churchill speech brings back how William Wyler uncannily paraphrased it in his Mrs. Miniver (1942), spoken as part of a sermon in an English church whose ceiling had been blasted open during the Blitz. Wyler visualized hope — contrasting an image of disaster — while the church congregation sang “Onward, Christian Soldiers.” Dunkirk might have matched Wyler’s nobility, but Nolan won’t risk offending our godless film industry.

> IN A WORLD...

File: 1474076245541.jpg (45KB, 250x241px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 250x241px

>actor comes out of character, talks to camera, back to character

>>85244886
degenerate

etc.

>>85244902
That's the reason why it's so great. You're watching degenerates describe there terrible life and existence. It's great anti-drug promotion.

Only episode I didn't like was the one where he's looking for the "drunken fish" in AIDSland.
Pretty anti-climatic and a waste of time honestly.

Powerlad

>>85244843

No, it's Throttle Youth

>>85244843
>>85244885
Reeeeee tell me!

File: die-hard-3-die-hard-with-a-vengeance.15819.jpg (432KB, 1000x1500px) Image search: [Google]

432KB, 1000x1500px

lets post action movies that are better than John Cuck

Saw the 1st one last week. Does the 2nd one compare? Might watch it

>>85535300
It's a really good movie It just catches flak because it's not as exceptional as the first.