Why is he allowed to get away with what he does to females in the industry?
Isn't he Jewish?
>>85643476
I don't think so.
just because women don't like to get fucked by you doesn't mean they don't like to get fucked.
what are some films that explore the racial diversity of medieval europe?
Never has a movie been this historical inaccurate and yet so good
>>85644399
This.
Calm down OP.
Based movie.
ROSENROT OH ROSENROT
what is he even doing, why is he pulling out some ship on its side from ice? wouldnt that destroy the ship?
>>85643372
I don't know if you've noticed, but zack snyder is a fucking retard
that's pretty much the answer
>>85643341
Volume 1 was better
What if Norm Macdonald wrote a Simpsons episode?
(by that i mean a golden age simpsons episode)
>>85643121
i don't even watch things with this guy in it but he just looks like the ' oh hey here i am this is my norm macdonald whacky voice and antics '
Norm's Form and Storm
Is fully realistic CGI humans the last barrier CGI needs to overcome?
Seems like given enough time and money they can do pretty much anything, from dinosaurs to mass battles to talking apes. They can even de-age actors convincingly, but 3 seconds of Leia in Rogue One is still too hard.
This is a 3d render.
>>85643158
yes, I can tell
>>85643090
I keked when Disney said they won't bring back Carrie Fisher in CGI for episode 9. That was only after everybody laughed at Tarkin and cgi Leia in Rogue One.
What are some MST3K movies you liked?
>>85643046
Space Mutiny
Kitten with a Whip was good too
Also, over time, I learned to enjoy [spoilers]Manos[/spoilers] for what it was
>>85643046
Diabolik
Ann-Margret was cute
yes
>>85642874
I liked it but has some of the worst fight scenes I have seen.
Syd a cute. CUTE
Is he an auteur?
No, he is a postmodernist.
>>85642502
I didn't go to medical school to become a Doctor. I just watched Scrubs
Oh it shows
Well?
slavery :^)
>>85642304
Baldness
That the weak should fear the strong
Nice
>>85642248
Sigh, she was so good-looking in The Conjuring.
Anyway, DROPPED
hmmmmmm
>>85642248
what did she mean by this?
http://www.marieclaire.com/celebrity/news/a28515/dunkirk-movie-review/
http://archive.is/OYCTO
>"[Dunkirk is] Christopher Nolan's new directorial gift to men, who are currently spending their time fervently ranking his movies, arguing about said rankings, and—presumably—wearing fedoras completely un-ironically. Or even worse, ironically."
>"The thing is, I just don't think Dunkirk is a very good movie—if your definition of the word movie is "moving images held together by a plot." Like, yes: Dunkirk is very well-made. I felt like I was going to vomit during it, because that's how intense it was."
>"It's a story worthy of being told and re-told, and I really enjoy war movies in general, but still—actual stuff needs to happen. Stuff other than scenes of men burning in oil-covered water, ships sinking, and bodies drowning."
>"But my main issue with Dunkirk is that it's so clearly designed for men to man-out over. And look, it's not like I need every movie to have "strong female leads." Wonder Woman can probably tide me over for at least a year, and I understand that this war was dominated by brave male soldiers. I get that. But the packaging of the film, the general vibe, and the tenor of the people applauding it just screams "men-only"—and specifically seems to cater to a certain type of very pretentious man who would love nothing more than to explain to me why I'm wrong about not liking it."
>"if Nolan's entire purpose is breaking the established war movie mold and doing something different—why not make a movie about women in World War II? Or—because I know that will illicit cries of "ugh, not everything has to be about feminism, ugh!"—how about any other marginalized group? These stories shouldn't be relegated to indie films and Oscar season. It's up to giant powerhouse directors like Nolan to tell them, which is why Dunkirk feels so basic. It's a summer war movie"
She's right ya know
>>85642185
>t. Naive woman who didn't get it
>>85642185
>t. Naive woman who didn't get it
>>85642185
>I don't dislike this movie because I'm a woman
>criticizes it because of men
7/0 bait
Christ this character is disikeable and vile. Just marathoned Preacher series 1 and this character is nothing like the comic version. Reminds me of Shadows ex in American Gods. Why when they try and make these female leads "bad ass" and "stronk" they just come across as having no fucking morales
idk about this show but dead wife is good, faggot.
but i guess you cuck just like to watch nigger shadow more
>>85642218
You said nigger while jerking it to a coal burner.
Kys
Western trash, no nice girls to waifu.
So the question - my kinographers - is is it any good?
Movie name?
unfair to compare its box office since it was re-released constantly. Might want to realise televisions and VHS wasn't everywhere back then
I am sure there are a bunch of contrarian articles/reviews out there that say it's complete dogshit, because when people go back and review older movies they fail to realise that movies are a product of their time and you can only give them a fair review when you judge it by the standards of the time it was made in.
Saw a thread about the History of Trunks HBO show yesterday but now can't find the source.
Anyone hyped for this?
>Gritty take on the franchise
>Trying to distance itself from the rest of the DB franchise
Any casting ideas?
Reeeing already?
>>85642031
If you couldn't find a source then it's fake you fucken troll.
It was fake news.
>>85641955
Because Spiderman is Peter Parker.
>>85641955
Because money.
>>85641955
Because contrary to what SJWs want you to believe, the general public wants to see Peter Parker and not some black bootleg version.