Archived threads in /tv/ - Television & Film - 1519. page

>>86704872

For the last time NO. Now stop asking, it only upsets your mother.

>>86704872
Why haven't you choked yourself with the necklace Gary?

>>86704998
I sold my neck to pay for an abortion for my chad buddy's side piece.

>>86703970
What's happening to her?

>>86704157
>her

>>86703970
Who's the girl on the left?

eharethaertjhaetyj

Why would they send about a dozen people to find a literal army?

Why would the dead be stopped by cold water?

Why would ice north of the wall be thin enough to break?

Why not fly Cersei up to the wall to see the army of undead that is apparently like 10 miles away from Eastwatch?

Why didn't they take horses with them in order to more quickly get in and out of the North?

Why did they take Gendry at all?

The important question is why isn't Euron fucking up the Nights King as we speak?

File: answer question.png (773KB, 1359x574px) Image search: [Google]

773KB, 1359x574px

...did you fuck my wife?

File: bee.jpg (240KB, 701x1000px) Image search: [Google]

240KB, 701x1000px

>>86704465
fuckin assholes

That's not a mosquito.

>>86705212
mosquitos are actually important, as much as we don't like them
wasps are fucking pests with no redeeming qualities whatsoever
they live only to fuck shit up, they contribute nothing to their ecosystem or otherwise

>>86704392

She is mad because he is only her nephew not her brother or father. Jon is not quite incest enough. But he's the only blood relative she has left so she realizes she has to fuck him and that will have to do.

>>86704392

You can't be "mother of dragons" without fucking some dragons.

>>86704392
Jon is king of the northlets.

Them travelling through time to fix the past was part of the original timeline.

File: 492cd9c43c849e4a09561a4a37851672fa05c185bc94366154e029fd19455781.jpg (1MB, 1623x2886px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1623x2886px

>>86704209
The real paradox would be the success of one the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody? Just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though

"No!" The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

>>86704286
based dullest poster bringing the heat

>>86704079
Good thread

Spiderman 4

The Babylon 5 movie and the Rome movie come to mind.

File: 1503353278594.jpg (503KB, 585x696px) Image search: [Google]

503KB, 585x696px

OPS MOM IS A DUMB WHORE WITH A FAT ARSE

File: image.jpg (424KB, 1920x1357px) Image search: [Google]

424KB, 1920x1357px

>>86703868
First for best boy

>>86703868
bless you

>>86703792
is that a picture of your fucking TV? is this fucking 2005?

>>86703792
What film or show am I looking at?

hard to tell from this angle

Who paid you to post this bullshit

if you read the books youd know they left a bunch of shit out. I hate how quidditch is pretty prevalent in episode 3 but in the movie its part of a match, plus he gets the broom early on, not at the end

File: 1483418897402.jpg (548KB, 1616x2896px) Image search: [Google]

548KB, 1616x2896px

People want "safe". They want "comfy". They want "familiar". That's why they'll purchase blu-rays of films based on one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

>>86703622
he's definitely The Guy.

>>86703832
>>86703622
for you.

That fag was such a pain in the ass in all 3 of LOTR