Thread replies: 3
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
Hey /sci,
What is the optimal format for a review of an article? I'm used to using the basic structure of:
Intro
Methodology
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
but that doesn't obviously doesn't fit here.
I realize this is almost homework tier but I just can't seem to figure this out and it's triggering my autism hard. Any help is appreciated.
>>
>>9170703
>but that doesn't obviously doesn't fit here.
I cannot parse that one, sorry.
Anyways, some discussion of previous work is usually in order, especially if you intend to make comparative analysis.
>>
>>9170703
>a review of an article
What do you mean by this exactly?
- A review, as in, an independent assessment that is meant to advise an editor of the quality of a submitted manuscript?
- An article that synthesizes a body of literature into a coherent framework?
- A commentary on a single published article?
The structure differs for all of these.
Thread posts: 3
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1