/sci/'s opinion on this book?

>>7583734
Never read it, never will.

>>7583734
Ruined? Is this a joke or this idiot actually trying to refute relativity?

Some idiot whining that Einstein didn't come up with relativity. Instead he says Poincare, Maxwell, Lorentz and others did.

>>7584975
Well he built on their work sure but its pretty stupid to pretend he didn't invent it cause of that.

>>7583734
>>7584975
>>7584978

Does he actually try to besmirch Einstein.

From the title I would've think he just discusses the paradigm shift away from non-relativistic physics?

I don't know why people would whine, only normies give him an undue amount of credit. Everyone else who read the history of the papers can see how well referenced his works are and how humble he was he never stole any any shit or anything like that.

>>7583734
This looks pretty dank. I might pick this up.

>>7585136
Well hello there, mister Schlafly!

>>7584975
> Poincare, Maxwell, Lorentz and others did
Yeah thats exactly what happened.
> b-but Einstein concluded the theory.
Putting your signature under someone elses hard work doesn't make it yours.

>>7585149
If you think all he did amounts to nothing more than singing his name on it your an idiot.

>>7585149
confirmed for not knowing shit and never learning anything about relativity

I just read a description. Here's what it sounds like: "Einstein made a big leap and fortunately the nice, symmetric paradigm shift happened to work out and be true. But string theory is bullshit jack-off material that doesn't even pretend to explain reality."

Why do you ask op?