someone post the pictures of god tier/shit tier majors, or anything

>>6580604
You're cool.

>>6580610
it's ok to be a computer science major, just as long as you know you're an autistic shutin

File: 1377897174528.jpg (63KB, 660x563px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 660x563px

>>6580604

>rank ordering majors

go do your fucking homework

File: 2ab79cb39d985c263538374306ab9c3a.png (289KB, 1072x1036px) Image search: [Google]

289KB, 1072x1036px

>>6580604

lol I love insecure students trying to put their programs in to tiers. Guess what? If you are doing really well u picked a god tier. If you are doing shitty then the program is not for you and u picked a shit tier. I took music as a major and now I make 120,000 per year. I admit im a rare case but I mean come on let's be real it's because I was good at it that I succeeded.

>>6580780
Why is philosophy mid tier?

File: 1402297917643.png (82KB, 1072x772px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 1072x772px

/thread

File: double physics.jpg (21KB, 226x266px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 226x266px

>>6580780
>Aerospace Engineering at the top

Aw yeah.

>>6580837
Pretty sure Aerospace is grouped in with Mechanical.

File: Uhm.jpg (7KB, 79x115px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 79x115px

>>6580844
>Aerospace grouped with mechanical

?

>>6580850
If your school has aero and mech look at the coursework for the two. Many schools have them lumped together as a major in mechanical and aerospace.

>>6580836

I would move physics to god tier.

I would also put chemistry and molecular biology to top tier.

>>6580780
why not mechanical?
do you not know what we do?

File: got a box.jpg (8KB, 93x135px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 93x135px

>>6580856
I'm doing completely different work from Mech majors.

Though it's probably because I'm at Mississippi State and they just love their Engineering program here.

>Tfw gonna build drones next year

File: fixd.jpg (149KB, 1072x772px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 1072x772px

>>6580836

how bout this one?

>>6580863
> money lower ranked than easy

At least people who go for money have some kind of drive and value to society.

>>6580861
It's basically mech for aircraft and spacecraft, so you need more fluid dynamics and propulsion, but mech learns that to an extent too.

>>6580871

People who select a major because it's easy are ostensibly in college for reasons they themselves do not quite know, presumably having to do with fun and friends.

On the other hand, people who are going to college to get money have already assigned a position of primacy to material wealth, which I would say without hesitation is totally delusional.

Chemical engineering with applied math minor with electives in petroleum engineering

Not as god tier as physics+math, but meh I don't plan to be an academic

File: Hm.jpg (16KB, 172x199px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 172x199px

>>6580872
Well, I guess my mech friends are just lazy and dumb, then.

Nothing wrong with second-best tier, though.

File: Oh Boy.jpg (6KB, 106x90px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 106x90px

>>6580881
>Not going to LSU, getting a Petroleum Major and making 90k out of the gate

File: 1294802161068.png (28KB, 917x548px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 917x548px

>>6580863
order is fucked

>>6580780
>grouping mechanical with civil
I have literally never understood this.

It's like saying chemical engineering and environmental engineering are the same thing.

>>6580876
The first part sure. The second part, I think you may be delusional.

Society has assigned position of primacy to wealth. You need money. Sure you could survive without it but no one wants to survive. They want to thrive. As shitty as it sounds money makes the world go round right now.

>>6580883
I could have gone to lsu... I could do petroleum engineering. I could of paid nothing for it. Actually I would have made money... but noooo I had to go to Auburn and I had to go be a condom engineer. Oh well makes the minor in lube even funnier. (Auburn having a tribology minor avaliable)

File: lmftfy.png (39KB, 917x548px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 917x548px

>>6581521

>>6580780
female oral history, yah its a real thing

File: collegeorientation.gif (366KB, 612x3658px) Image search: [Google]

366KB, 612x3658px

>>6580876
>people who are going to college to get money have already assigned a position of primacy to material wealth, which I would say without hesitation is totally delusional.
"Assigned a position of primacy"? Are you kidding me with this shit?

What, do you think that the decision of whether to go to college, or what to take there, is the central decision of your life? Mostly it's just how you make connections and get qualified for a job. OF COURSE you should be thinking about what it costs and how much more you'll make with it.

If you're one of the guys who claims that college is supposed to teach you to think, I can tell you that's fucking ridiculous. If you go to college unable to think, you're going to come out unable to think.

Material wealth is fucking important. It's how you can afford to support a family in comfort, and give your kids opportunities. Most people have no option but to spend most of their adult lives in pursuit of material wealth. For the majority, college is a necessary means of avoiding poverty.

Unless you're a trust fund kid or a genius, your choice of post-secondary education should be a compromise between the income potential and job security offered by an option, its costs, and its correspondence with your talents and your interests.

It's an investment. It should be an intelligent investment, with a realistic prospect of positive returns.

File: 1276270181286.jpg (160KB, 1069x1107px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 1069x1107px

>>6580604

File: 1277214272633.jpg (75KB, 852x839px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 852x839px

.mmmm

>Economics
>Low tier

ok:(.jpg

File: 1276398812468.jpg (73KB, 500x820px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 500x820px

>>6581756

>>6580844
Usually... if you fail out of Aero you can do Mechanical... and if you fail out of that you can do Industrial... fail out of that and do business school.

File: 1277921348616gay.jpg (69KB, 960x477px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 960x477px

>>6581766
>u invent something that matches the "shape" of the partial memory, it's assumed to be the corresponding information.

>>6581766
> if you fail out of Aero you can do Mechanical
for the 5 classes that aren't exactly alike?

if you fail out of business you do psych (at least at my school)

>>6581768
Yeah.. ain't it the truth... BS and MS in Aero Eng.. . and I end up building information management systems and websites

>>6581774
4 freaking years of doing one of the most regimented degrees in college... started out with about 40 students ended up with about 20, and NEVER once did a day of engineering... Seems I have a great talent for programming.

File: 1278211070473.gif (140KB, 468x939px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 468x939px

>>6581780

File: ritchie.png (417KB, 585x548px) Image search: [Google]

417KB, 585x548px

>>6580780

tfw computer science

tfw you can do all discrete mathematics
tfw you can do all engineering
tfw you can do all chemistry
tfw you can do all astronomy
tfw you can do all medicine

tfw you could replace all these people

tfw you can do most physics

tfw shit tier

>>6581780

you started out with 40 and ended up with 20?

i started with 450 and ended with 28 lol.

File: 12770.jpg (111KB, 500x820px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 500x820px

>>6581757
>Biology

>>6581891
I like to dream too Hank

>>6580813

Philosophy should be fucking "Waste of Life Tier"

>>6581521
>God tier: What you love
Why do people keep doing this, this is what brings on hoards and hoards of Art majors.

>Not majoring in what will help your nation tower above the rest

Where does Electrician stand?

Am I a faggot too?

>>6582034
>being a dog

>>6581946
if biology is paranormal to you, you should go back to /d/

>>6582008

but it's reality!

medicine is an index and application of a catalogue of intrinsic properties. big data and datamining, I can do that.

engineering and chemistry is the same as the above plus optimization and reduction. I can do that too. very well.

astronomy is just computer science at this point.

physics is mostly just computer science at this point.


>eyo anon, we want to simulate this particle beam because the accelerator's fucking expensive! write us a program! here's a physics textbook and here's a paper, have fun!

>eyo anon, you need to fix our simulation, we discovered this object 85 au out and it's apparently interfering with E5678 which deviates from our model

>eyo anon, we want to make a drug that activates R1234, can you give us a hint?

>eyo anon, look at this aerofoil, we decided we want to make the structural bolts out of styrofoam, will it still hold? can you also review the general shape because we just drew that on a whiteboard.

>eyo anon, can you write me an app that helps me make diagnostic decisions? but make sure that it doesn't actually make definitive diagnoses because only a doctor can make actual diagnoses.

>>6582034

*tips gestapo cap*

>>6582053
that would be an interesting post if any of the things you say weren't false

>>6582053
>all scientific fields are just computer science
>they just don't know it yet but I could replace them all

>being this ignorant

>>6582047
>>6582060
I know it sounds edgy as shit but really, you should at least try to do something to help the country you live in succeed.
Also means there will most likely would be work available for you.

>>6582064

fix my twisted worldview anon

the interdisciplinarity of CS often boils down to "I need these results, here's a resource, if you have any questions I'll be playing farmville or arguing with my boss."

>>6582073
that's what you say. Which makes what you do "what you love". If someone else doesn't give a shit about what his country does and succeeds with whatever it is he likes, that's just the same.

File: 1000px-World_Citizen_Flag.svg[1].png (66KB, 1000x600px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 1000x600px

>>6582034
>>6582073
>not being a world citizen and doing what is best for all peoples

>>6582077
I'm not going to, it's not my problem.

But you said it yourself:
>the interdisciplinarity of CS often boils down to "I need these results, here's a resource"

I'm sure you are smart enough to understand that in order to obtain said resource, know what results to expect, how to evaluate said results and connect them to different ones you need to have an understanding of what the fuck you are doing. Which in case of a physicist could be understanding the behavior of particles that he is studying or in case of a doctor the physical and biochemical profiles of the patient whose blood is being tested. Which is the shit you learn when getting the according degree.
Your argument is figuratively marie schrader saying she could take a much better x-ray than the doctors.

>>6582083


flag suggests interpretative dancing?

>>6582071

that's what they all say

not as in "that's what they all say"

but literally, by the words: that's what they all say.

science and applied science just boil down to two things:

1) information
2) application of information on information

It's reasonable: people are afraid of becoming obsolete, hence: "you can't do what I do".

but the reality is that you are integrating more and more CS into your field. a lot of nieches can't work without it anymore.

>>6582077
>>6582091

CS is obviously a part of all scientific fields nowadays since you need to compute your fucking results. That makes it as little a replacement for other scientic work as a navigation system is a replacement for a truck driver (in fact less, because this is somewhat feasible)

>>6582100
hurr

obviously everybody integrates more and more CS into their fields. Why the fuck not, it's the 21st century. Your point? When the scientific world started integrating optical devices into their fields, did that make opticians into physicists? Your argument makes no sense whatsoever. Maths are part of science. "a lot of nieches can't work without it anymore."
Does that mean a mathematician knows about chemistry the way a chemist does? obviously not, they are fucking different things.

>science and applied science just boil down to two things:

>1) information
>2) application of information on information


that's a completely meaningless and insubstancial sentence that could be twisted and applied to anything.

art just boils down to
1) ideas
2) applying color to realize ideas

I'm now an artist

computer science just boils down to

1) data
2) handling of data

I'm now a computer scientist

>>6582091
>marie schrader saying she could take a much better x-ray than the doctors.

interesting analogy because the guidelines that tell doctors how to take x-rays and what to do with these x-rays come from a CS standard.

but you're right. specialists are able to reinterpret interpreted results much quicker than someone who's not a specialist.

File: d5c[1].jpg (36KB, 625x626px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 625x626px

>>6582100

guys...stop

>>6582115
>computer science just boils down to
>1) data
>2) handling of data
>I'm now a computer scientist

yeah it does. do you know how to handle data? yes? congrats, you can have my degree. wait, what's that? you don't? aww shucks.

>>6582118
>the guidelines that tell doctors how to take x-rays and what to do with these x-rays come from a CS standard.

the guidelines for the specific machinery come from a CS standard, because it's fucking CS.
They originate from Röntgen, were explored and established by physicists and physicians alike and are now defined by CS standards because they are performed by computers.

A doctor's main occupation has never been to operate the internal workings of computers or machinery, just as it is not his job to sharpen his surgical paraphernalia. He is not trained to do so just as a computer scientist is not trained to perform a surgery.
All scientific fields overlap, have always overlapped and will continue to do so. That does not make one of them replaceable.

>>6582124

>1) information
>2) application of information on information

do you know how to apply information on information in a way that will produce innovation in particle physics? yes? congrats to you as well, why are we arguing?

>>6582135

thanks for the gratz.

>>6582142
thanks for the degree

>>6581946
This needs to be updated now that /pol/ is the biggest cancer board on 4chan.

>>6582130

just what is a doctor trained to do?

make diagnoses, provide treatment.

machinery is encroaching upon the doctor, and it's just a matter of time until many of them will be replaced.

many doctors do not believe that, and you apparently don't either, but I think, based on what I have seen, it's just a matter of time, and time will surely tell.

>>6582146

so you know how to work data structures now?

>>6582156
It's the same argument people have been making since the industrial revolution.
>10 years from now we'll all be replaced by robots

every work field where machinery can be used, machinery is used and as machinery becomes more refined, more ways to use it are found.

Saying that machinery will "replace" humans in a workfield as complex as medicine is complete nonsense, we are still decades away from even self-driving cars. Not even assembly line workers (the #1 example for machines replacing humans for almost 200 years) have been replaced completely so far.
You could postulate the same thing about every other profession, including computer science itself and be just as right/wrong.

Compressing a whole field into two categories in an attempt of simplification is bound to be an imprecise and worthless statement.


it is obvious that every discipline requires specialized knowledge, which is why you either study one or the other. Or both of course, not holding you back. Generalizing about any of them, presuming replaceability by any other is just as silly as putting them in arbitrary tier lists and is just another way of internet penis measuring.

>>6582162
about as well as you know how to innovate in particle physics

>>6582053
>physics is mostly just computer science at this point.
Not really. Sure, some physicists use computers (far fewer than you make out), but they need a very thorough understanding of the physics before programming anything. Your first example conversation would never happen; you could not develop a decent simulation of particle interactions without a very deep understanding of the physics involved. You cannot just pick up a textbook and paper without and prior knowledge and suddenly understand the physics therein.

>>6582156
by the way, just to inform you, the computer equipment used in many labs and hospitals is garbage. Like late 90s-2005 technology. You wouldn't believe it sometimes.
Much less CS than there should be.

>>6582176


Vinod Khosla replacing doctors

google self driving car prototype

I think your assembly line argument mostly boils down to cost-effectiveness. a kid in a sweat shop is cheaper than a robot.

but there is a severe shortage of and demand for doctors.

well, it doesn't matter. we'll see.

>>6582177

I don't need to whip out my published cock because we're on the internet but suffice to say I have made contributions. and I don't claim to be a physicist, but physicists are often very well versed in CS.

>>6582183
>You cannot just pick up a textbook and paper without and prior knowledge and suddenly understand the physics therein.

yes you can. it's usually a month to year long project where you first work yourself into the material and then build your models.

>>6582188
>computer equipment used in many labs and hospitals is garbage

you have no idea how much work went into that. and most of it still works fine.