Well?
>>8647640
R2.
I don't know why I still draw R1 by hand, always looks like shit
R1 cause I like the squiggly line
R2 for a resistor, R1 for an arbitrary source of resistance.
Hello /sci/
I'm interested in hacking but I don't know where to start
I would appreciate the help
Tanks
>>8647616
https://www.hackthissite.org/
install gentoo
>>8647616
bulk up to about 400 lbs and then move into your mom's basement
Math was a mistake, humanity would be a lot better off without it. Prove me wrong.
>>8647559
The proof is (You)
>>8647559
>implying math was invented
>>8647623
I think he means the study thereof
Left or right? What is your justification?
Ultimately, the right side will cause less total pain then the left side.
But it doesent matter because since the result is amblified to infinity and they're both -1/12 moral.
tldr
>>8647515
Run over the lefty obviously
What is an interesting hard scifi concept that is rarely explored.
As in we have space stations, AI and genetic engineering in everything but what concept is generally ignored or never get's explored.
>>8647430
Language.
>>8647444
In what way?
>>8647430
The idea that there are concepts that humans don't understand.
For instance, we have theory of mind and many other species do not.
What do we lack that others may have?
I recently found a researcher who believes he's rediscovered Nikola Tesla's Radiant Energy and can use it to heal others.
Thoughts? One of his videos are linked below.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KT-h8sPHm7I
>"researcher"
>>8647424
Do explain?
What's sgthis radiant energy? I was under the impression it was EMR ?
>>8647424
Peer reviewed scientific literature or didn't happen.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=giS41utjlbU
>>8647411
So, like what does it do exactly?
>>8647417
Modern cavalry
>>8647417
it looks cool
...that's about it, it doesn't really have any practical application
I'm torn between going for Chemistry, or Biochemistry as a major
Which will one has the best guarantee for a job?
Also on a scale of 1 to 10, how difficult would you rate them? (just to mentally prepare)
P.S. i'm going for a bachelor's degree
>>8647245
they're both good majors, which one are you most passionate about?
as for which will 'guarantee' a job...nope. completely depends on who you are, where you are, which grade you achieved. definitely no guarantees.
how are we supposed to rate them on difficulty? i doubt anybody has done both, so they cant know.
Biochem is harder
>>8647245
Just skip the bullshit and look around for work as a janitor. It's essentially the same thing.
Debunk this or dream with me.
Visit the site before posting.
what makes this more efficient than a space elevator? dope idea though.
How does the tube react to the temperature fluctuation?
>>8647177
i love startram
it wont work but i still love it :D
what mathematics are complex enough to be interesting but easy enough for a brainlet to understand ?
riemann hypothesis
>>8647140
You answered your own question. Fractals.
Series.
If an astronaut in a spaceship is moving close to the speed of light for a year, is the ship getting bombarded with less or more radiation? Considering blue-shift.
>>8647077
more.
>>8647087
Care to explain? Not OP and I don't understand
>>8647150
[math] blue \; balls [/math]
Metaphorically speaking, what would you consider to be the microprocessor of consciousness?
your mom
>>8647075
Ha jokes on you. I no longer want sex from her since it finally happened. Ive been freed of all nasty temptations.
>>8647067
Brain is the microprocessor. Your consciousness is the software. However it's more like self-modifying hardware, so it doesn't really have a SW+HW part instead it simply does physical, HW, changes which are analogous to SW. It looks like it's more effective this way.
are they evil?
>>8647052
no.
>>8647052
President of CERN here. Can confirm. Physics is just a front, we're actually opening a portal to hell.
>open up a book on mathematical foundations, eager to learn about how to define 'set'
>"Set is a collection of objects. We denote a set like this... relations..."
>Drop the book into a garbage bin.
The first sentence should have been the last sentence of the book I am looking for.
What's the most rigorous, unambiguous, exact explanation/book you know on the foundations on mathematics/logic? Like if alien came here and didn't understand a word you said, but had a high capacity to learn and was blind, what would be the best way to teach him math?
>>8646911
>foundations on mathematics
Which foundations? If sets are good enough then Set Theory by Jech will probably suffice. Other than that I've a few people rave about Homotopy Type Theory (which is available online), never read it myself so can't really comment on it.
>>8646911
>most rigorous
>unambiguous
>exact explanation
You've already failed at anything /sci/ if those's aren't either givens, implied, or the antonyms aren't applied.
Be a wolf not a sheep.
>>8647008
Thank you for your 'feeling'/'intuitionistic approach'
But that will definitely NOT help answering actual questions like machine learning and AI
I'm sure your approach is excellent in fields like economy and marketing though, but not mathematics and programming
What's a good major to get a PhD in?
None. PhDs are just to circlejerk and dick wave. They aren't actually useful.
>>8646884
I want to be a professor though
>>8646871
Anything that you enjoy and find interesting. Also anything where you can be better than others.