>>8660727
We're already colonizing Europa with refugees, get cucked boiiii
>>8660730
Soon they will also invade Uranus.
>>8660727
No, just like colonizing any planet but earth, let's face it.
By the way, Jupiter is like 5 times the distance from the sun as earth. That gives you just a 25th of the sun light. That's nothing.
I teach at a university.
Broadly speaking there are three sorts of people who tend to come to my office for help in their assignments. The majority don't do it at all and at most ask one or two questions over e-mail so I'm not counting those.
The first type is the diligent student who just wants some tips, often in doing something more advanced than what the assignment asked for. Sometimes it's clear they just want a pat on the back or want to show off, but that's okay. Very rarely they have some exotic problem (often caused by their unorthodox approach) that they need proper help with.
The second type is the lazy but smart person who started working on their assignment very late (and probably missed some classes too). Their problems are usually a combination of being far behind schedule and having some serious holes in their knowledge of the material (probably covered in the classes they missed). They're usually intelligent enough for an explanation and some pointers to put them right on track to a passing grade.
Type three is the genuine thicko who usually works VERY hard but is just too thick to get it. Instruction rolls off them like water off a duck's back. They're usually very respectful as they continue bugging you about even the most obvious things. They rarely ever "get" anything; they can be instructed to reach a goal but will then be stumped anew the next time they encounter the very same problem.
Even though their reasons are the most innocent and admirable, I fucking hate type three. They're so annoying to deal with. I don't mind the other two types at all.
Am I a bad person? How do I learn to deal with type three properly?
What do you teach?
>tfw you're not sure if you're type 2 or 3
FeelsBadMan
>>8651304
There is only 1 type:
Type retardo: Wastes his time going to office hours instead of downloading another book to keep advancing at an accelerated pace.
I found pic related in a book about problems in number theory, in the section of diphantine equations. It is so different from other problems and I am confused. What is the point of the problem?
Am I supposed to get the 5th power of all those numbers, add them up and then find the 5th root or is there some kind of trick meant to be used here?
I mean, I am sure that I could do it by brute force if given enough time but that doesn't feel like mathematics. There must be some trick, right?
>>8669064
144
>>8669087
I know the answer. But I am wondering what they expect me to do to get it.
>>8669090
Galois Theory maybe ?
For one, we would all be aryan ubermen by now if it weren't for "ethics".
What other instances have held science back due to "muh ethics"?
>>8669025
Let me guess you haven't even finished high school right.
>>8669025
lack of ethics is holding science back.
Too much pressure to publish and a bunch of bullshit gets published.
Too hard to understand what is true in the sea of bullshit.
What's holding back science is that we make talented people who want to do innovative things jump through a lot of hoops that have nothing to do with actually doing science.
Sorry if this has been asked before,but I was thinking about it on the shitter.
Light doesn't escape black holes, right? I'm assuming that means no energy or matter is able to.
With that said, couldn't a suitably massive gravity well serve as a "cosmic battery" of sorts? All in theory, of course.
We could draw in ambient energy via a gravity well and, in this fantasy where a gravity well can be activated and deactivated, retrieve energy as needed and do this indefinitely, right?
>>8668870
>in this fantasy where a gravity well can be activated and deactivated
how do you mean?
you want to turn the gravity on and off?
>>8669010
Not exactly, I can't think of a better way to describe it. I imagine a gravity well is passive but there might be some way to destroy it? And recreate it at some other point.
>>8669013
>I imagine a gravity well is passive
A gravity well is just space time bent by large amounts of densely packed mass/energy. The gravity well of Earth and that of a black hole are fundamentally the same, except the black holes is larger and has a singularity at it's center. The bending of spacetime is a fundamental property of our universe, it cannot be destroyed.
Name me one scientifically validated concept present in psychology or psychiatry that is used objectively in practice, and is noted per a scientific instrument.
Name one scientifically validated """""""instrument""""""""
Oh, what's that? You're one of those retards that thinks science is never open to seismic shift or change? You actually think axioms hold?
>>>/reddit/
>>8668833
That's neither an answer nor a scientific argument.
It's just projection and an falsifiable nonsensical mishmash, which is what all people in the social sciences do when they're asked to prove their case.
It's a distraction move.
Answer the damn question.
>>8668837
/Sci/ doesn't owe you anything, autist.
Go and do your own research.
Are there any biological limitations to how much muscle tissue a stem cell can produce? Is it possible to produce flesh by the ton with only one stem cell or a small handful of them?
Cultured meat was hyped back in 2013 and as of recent it's made into a few stores, but there isn't much out there describing the scaling of production or limitations which is why I'm asking. Only problems I've heard with this so far is the taste needs to be improved.
>>8668731
>>as of recent it's made into a few stores
bullshit, provide a source for this RIGHT NOW
>>8668747
http://beyondmeat.com/whats-new/view/beyondburger-distribution-update
>>8668731
It's really difficult to re create the vasulature in vitro. Once the cultured cells get to a certain mass the nutrients can't get to middle and growth stops.
Guys this app is being retarded. That equation would form a parabola that would be in between the first and second quadrants. Some geologist confirm.
it would be in quadrants 1 and 2 unless there was a specific restriction on the domain of x stated in the problem.
>>8668015
You are falsely assuming the parabola is upight. A tilted parabola can certainly be within any quadrant.
Consider y = x^2 + 100. Now rotate the axes left by 45 degrees.
>>8668046
Ignore this totally wrong sorry.
>80% of females reproduce but only 40% of males
So if there's a greater selective pressure on males, isn't it only natural for men to be superior to women.
No. The smarter one is, the less likely they are to reproduce, specially of they are men. So, of anything, the number of superior men should be dropping.
I hope I don't have to explain to you why intelligence = superiority
>>8667939
This happened for a period about 8000 years ago. No one knows why.
>>8667965
>The smarter one is, the less likely they are to reproduce
>intelligence = superiority
One's intelligence doesn't mean shit if they lack the social acuity to successfully pass on their own genes. In the world of biology, the one who produces the most amount of successfully viable offspring (that can then reproduce themselves) reins supreme.
>tfw born in the generation where AI will do 90% of all jobs
>tfw too dumb to learn programming
>>8667792
>tfw born in the generation where AI will do 90% of all jobs
You're either underage or delusional, the generation being born now may be that one, or it may be their kid's. Definitely not this generation (Gen Y).
>>8667804
the moment when having a machine do a specific job becomes cheaper than the person doing the same job, the machine will replace the person
this already happened a number of times in the past
I didn't say it wouldn't happen, or that it wouldn't happen on a widespread global scale. Just that AI won't take 90% of all the jobs within our lifetimes (until we retire).
Yesterday's problem: How many ways can n distinguishable balls be painted with white, black, red, and blue if an even number of balls must be painted white?
Today's problem: Same as yesterday's, except the balls are now indistinguishable. There are two possible answers, one uses summation notation and the other does not.
Reminder that in this case, 0 is an even number.
>>8667766
>How many ways... ...be painted with white, black, red, and blue
infinite? Since a (assuming perfect) sphere has infinite points on its surface which will give you infinite combinations of points containing at least one white, black, red and blue point within the set. Assuming the 'paint' has infinitely small particles.
>>8667834
Each ball is painted one color.
>>8667838
That changes everything.
You're really telling me that this guy "invented" gravity
>what goes up must come down
You really expect me to believe that newton is the first person to realize this
You're really telling me that this guy "invented" pi
>what can be derived from the properties of arcs and triangles, in combination with derivations of Euclid's first prop of Book X MUST help determine the circumference of a unit circle!
You really expect me to believe that Archimedes is the first person to realize this
>>8667642
You would be surprised how much religious dogmatism affected how people perceived reality back then.
For majority of people "its just way God made it" was valid explanation.
Is it just one guy who posts the same thread on /his/ and /sci/? Are you studying the responses? Is /lit/ dead?
Who /shitty student/ here?
>only talk to professors and TA's about school related things, to autistic to make proper small talk before and after class
>only ask questions or use office hours as an EXTREME last resort
>don't ask for career or school advice
>don't volunteer, only participate in class if mandatory
>basically an easily forgotten nameless face
>all the other students build rapport and make class enjoyable for the professor
I bet you don't even get invited to the monthly professor/student parties.
I'm like this
It was hard finding recommendations for things
>>8667563
Childhood trauma, neglect or abuse. They are more arrogant, full of themselves as their parents.
Who has more money and higher standart of living?
A thirld worlder who makes 40k per year or a first worlder who makes 80k per year.
99.9% of anons answer wrong to this.
>More money
Obviously the first worlder
>Higher standard of living
Depends on the things you value. You an afford more for your money in the third world but you'll be surrounded by uneducated people you can pay $5 to suck your dick. In the first world 80k won't go as far but still gets you a nice house and family along with a non-crumbling infrastructure.
The latter.
>>8667564
>he thinks latinoamerica, india and asia are failling states
not diferent than living in some poor area in the US.
argentina, uruguay and chile are still nice.
or eastern europe.
a 40k job in latinoamerica will put you in the top 1% of jobs.
so, you failed the question.
how much money does being in the top 1% of jobs in europe has to make?
What's a proper single method to factorize all polynomials?
my head hurts trying to memorize all the BS ways to factorize a polynomial.
1. Find a root.
2. Do long division by (x-root) and go back to 1.
Works numerically on large degrees too, but you have to be more careful.
For Galois fields you move to a higher order field first.
>>8667372
how bout synthetic division?
>>8667379
have this picture then.