Is this scientifically feasible?
>>8682125
No. Radiation from the reactor would kill the user.
not yet, but if we had the technology to build that suit. Its only real use would likely be; just to lift and maneuver heavy things in situations where robots/AI would have issues. The technologies associated with it could be put to better and more effective use.
>>8682125
More likely this is
What is the most fundamental reason(s) why humans can't imagine new colors?
The brain is an enormously complex molecule and "computer". Is there any physical law that would prevent us from 'adding' new module to brain for new color.
What is stopping us from adding new emotion to anything actually? Like human module with which they could feel electric and magnetic fields?
Our eyes pick up wavelengths from 390mm to 700mm. To distinguish the wavelengths in the visible spectrum from each other, we use three colors, red green and blue. Red for 700mm, green for 500mm and blue for 450mm. Any wavelengths in between are a mix of the nearest two colors. On the high end of the spectrum everything's red. On the low end of the spectrum everything's violet, not blue because of some errors.
There's nothing stopping you from modifying your eyes so they use a fourth color for some specific wavelength. You can pick a wavelength in the ultraviolet or maybe even x-rays. That'll give you x-ray vision and an entirely new unique color.
>>8679379
Yeah but where does it stop?
Could I create 170'000 different feelings that appear as colors in visual field, and map each of them to an english word?
So for example every word would have unique color. Not like "shade of green" but unique color.
>>8679385
feelings..? I'm talking about assigning colors to wavelengths of light for your eyes.
Feelings come from something completely different, chemicals in your brain and body. I don't know how new chemicals would affect your mind differently.
http://gulfnews.com/news/uae/general/uae-to-build-first-city-on-mars-by-2117-1.1978549
Insanely rich people used to finding ways to survive in a harsh, dry climate and building huge climate controlled structures... it's just wild enough, it might work!
>>8676761
I live in the UAE, and it's pretty good. it is the most peaceful country there is. You can literally leave your door open and not worry about a theif coming in, although it is advisable not to do so.
>>8676776
>I live in the UAE
Could you please get in touch with your countrymen and advise them to accelerate their schedule? I want to go to the Mars Shopping Festival and ski indoors on the slopes of Olympus, but I doubt I will make it to 2117.
>>8676761
>Allahu Mars-bar
It's nice they're spending money on researching new technologies which will (probably) benefit the entire humanity as a whole but I would prefer it if they planned to do it within the next 50-60 years.
Cantor–Schröder–Bernstein edition:
Let G,H be two groups, such that there exists an injective morphism f:G->H and an injective morphism g:H->G. Does there exist a group isomorphism?
Oooh another math general. Unrelated to OP, what is everyone researching? I was going to go through pic related.
A function f:R->R (defined everywhere, finite everywhere) that is everywhere locally unbounded (for any open interval (a,b) the function takes arbitrarily large values) ?
(Answer in picture)
>>8682932
Why don't you give us a proof, anon? Sounds like a suspicious claim.
Is there anything in science that gives credence to free will existing?
Is there anything in nature that happens completely randomly? Would this give the free will argument some legitimacy?
>>8682018
Lmao if you don't want ur free will i know someone that might
>>8682018
>Is there anything in science that gives credence to free will existing?
No. Actually, many interpretations of quantum mechanics shed a wholly deterministic light on the universe. Determinism is more plausible than ever, contrary to many people's belief.
>>8682030
Apparently, philosophical questions are beyond this brainlet's scope of comprehension.
>>8682018
>Is there anything in science that gives credence to free will existing?
quite the opposite is what we've found and if you have an IQ above 120, it's pretty easy to understand that the deeper you go, you will find a reason to why you did something at a physiological level, which is not free will and the only reason free will was ever an idea was because we did not know enough and that's where you go to some easy, simple conclusion of """free will""" instead of the reality, which points to an "absolutely not" conclusion.
This is also not math or science related.
>>>/his/
T - 7 hours
Patrician Streams
>https://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/nasatv/
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v8U2KXZzvtA
Plebeian Normalfag (Hosted) Stream:
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5bG37hzwqk
rocket on the pad
The more basic the better.
There are plenty of theories to the two below, but nothing has been proven yet.
>how bikes stay upright
>why is ice slippery
What else?
>>8682338
Don't bikes stay upright because they are moving to fast to fall over or something?
>cue 100 false explanations of why bikes stay upright
Are you ready?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-_HKOcYBK8
>>8677031
I'm all for increasing scientific literacy, but I have a feeling just from that thumbnail, this will immediately marginalize the conservative crowd whom which I believe should be the intended audience.
also
>sex
Jesus.
Why is "the science guy" not a scientist?
Jesus, this whole "Bill Nye isn't a fucking hack" thing has gone on for too long. We all know the only reason why he has any sort of nostalgia for us is that we got to watch TV in school. Then, a couple universities got the smart idea to have him speak there to give them the "were progressive and engaging vibe. Now this shit?
No. Fuck this.
The cockroaches are placed in ice water as a kind of crude anesthetic. Then the kids are instructed to sand down a patch of shell on the cockroach's head and superglue electrodes to the newly smooth area. Next, a ground wire is stuck into the cockroach's thorax — the area right between its neck and stomach. Finally, the kids must carefully trim the antennae and stick small silver electrodes in them that will receive the signal from the circuit that attaches to the cockroach's back and resembles a tiny backpack.
Swiping the screen of a smartphone controls the RoboRoach's movement.
Scientists see these kits as a serious violation of basic ethics.
Uhh yea that's a huge violation of ethics holy fuck
>>8686052
ethics shmethicks you fucking cuck
What is the chance for genetically damaged kids with abnormalities if a boy and a girl are who are first cousins, marry each other? The boy and girl do not have very significant genetic defects.
All 4 of their parents are also first cousins with each other.
>>8685793
are you all jews?
>>8685793
1/27
>>8685793
Just look at the next white kid you see. White people mastered inbreeding.
t. Jewish masterrace
For positive integers n, we have that floor(n^2/3) is a prime number.
>>8685568
Your conjecture holds until 8
Very unimpressive
back to work, mochi-san
>>8685568
This is fucking retarded
>>8685573
you don't even need to go up to 8
it fails at 5 and if you don't want to do computations it's immediate that it fails for 6
Tesla curled each of his toes one-hundred times a night to, believing it stimulated his brain. Was he right? Can toe-curling free me from brainletdom.
>>8685502
Yes
>placebo
I actually plug 25ug of 1p-lsd every morning, thinking it helps me go about my days without acting autistic.
>>8685502
Is this a meme or should I really start curling. I'll fucking do it m8
>>8685507
wouldn't you act even weirder if you were tripping? I come off as pretty crazy when tripping except a couple times where I had no anxiety and felt normal but still had disassociation.
>When you realize there is no such thing as the scientific """""""""""method"""""""""""""
>>8685111
delete this
>>8685111
>when you realize you wasted 5 years of your life pursuing a worthless phd and publishing bullshit papers that only benefit your kike adviser
>>8685117
>>8685120
>When you realize the scientific """"""""method"""""""" was made up by scientists to give their arguments and theories some credence but are as baseless as anything else
I just got 25/33 on the online IQ test on
https://www.mensa.lu/en/mensa/online-iq-test/online-iq-test.html
this means I have good chances of passing the real mensa test.
To pass the mensa test you need an IQ of over 132. Does this mean that I could actually be a genius?
I'm really a sperg and have low rankings in all the video games I play, so I have a hard time believing I have a high IQ.
Is IQ really pseudoscience or not?
IQ isn't pseudoscience, but it isn't that reliable as it seems. There's just no better quantitative value to present intelligence.
IQ online tests are irrelevant though, just like any online test.
But this is /sci/, so people will probably swear by it and call you a brainlet if you say otherwise.
>>8685086
Mensa is a meme. I had an actual psychological evaluation rank me at above 140, and I personally would not call myself a genius by any other standard. Take it with a grain of salt and don't let it get to you. It doesn't mean anything.
>>8685086
It was so boring and pointless.
I got a 24 but it was only worth 4 minutes of my time. I don't need to prove my intelligence: I can focus long enough to cross the street and this makes me brilliant compared to 99.99% of the population who have serious mental retardation.
So too, lots of screwed up guys writing those tests: based on their arrogant bias, or did you think they put in questions they can't answer?
>we can make children in artificial wombs without women?
>we can make men's dicks bigger?
>we have 90% realistic sexbots?
>we can correct loose skin without painful and dangerous surgery?
You are free to answer these and/or ask your own "how long until...?" questions.
>>8685027
>we can make children in artificial wombs without women
I recently looked into this and there hasn't been done much research into it at.
I guess nobody wants to touch this bc of ethical reasons.
It's also hard as fuck getting the fluids just right. Would cost a lot of money, might cost as much as Surrogacy costs today.
>we can make men's dicks bigger?
What do you care if you're gonna fuck realistic sexbots anyway
>we have 90% realistic sexbots?
Depends, do you actually want it to have motor and talking capabilities or just a realistic doll.
>we can correct loose skin without painful and dangerous surgery?
probably not without surgery. But i canbe made less painful and dangerous.
>>8685027
>we can make children in artificial wombs without women?
maybe somewhere around 2050, give or take 20 years
>we can make men's dicks bigger?
We can already do that to some extent.
>we have 90% realistic sexbots?
around 2035 I guess
>we can correct loose skin without painful and dangerous surgery?
Its neither painful or dangerous with anesthetics and well paid doctors.
>>8685027
>how long until...
all the pervs are gone.