Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 754. page

>>8719013

More tires.

Stronger concrete

>>8719013
A ramp

>>8718983
I study theoretical QM and kys faggot

>>8718983
Schrodinger's cuck is an example of superposition. If you put a cuck in a bunker with a bomb, there is a chance that the bomb explodes or that the bomb doesn't explode (if the bomb explodes the cuck dies). You leave the cuck in that bunker and cannot see the cuck. Quantum Mechanics suggest that the cuck is in a superposition of living and dead, until you go check if it is living or dead so that the universe has to decide a definite state of either a living cuck or a dead cuck.

>>8719001
But that is to us who are not watching him from the outside. What about his vision inside? I mean, I can understand to our point as a observer, but why would this thing actually care or be in a super state? Does it mean that everything we can't watch isn't defined? We are special little beings that just decide if something is or not? Shouldn't it adopt a position even if not watched?

You see, that's all, I don't understand the observer thing in practice at all.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hByJBdQXjXU

File: Hooky_patrick.jpg (76KB, 400x300px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 400x300px

>>8718981
What the flying fuck are you talking about mate.

>>8718981
>>8718999
Oh bloody bumfuck.
Physics is a way we describe reality, a way we can predict reality. If you ask what IS gravity, what IS dark matter you are missing the point.

File: 1488172237392.gif (24KB, 60x95px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 60x95px

>>8718934
Here
Here
Maybe we are all getting smaller

>>8718934
I have the answer, but I'm to scared to post it.

That dog is looking at me funny...AND THE FUCKER HAS A KNIFE!

>>8718934
it's not expanding it's running the fuck away from that dog

File: Stress.png (79KB, 886x620px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 886x620px

>>8718887
its called FEA nigga

I know the integral of a 2-d plane, but how do I start with 3 variables?

>>8718891
without software?

>>8718562
I think this is what you're looking for
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graph_isomorphism_problem

File: a478e7e9b5e18eef41497b32cc23c44a6281c207_hq.jpg (66KB, 683x1024px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 683x1024px

>don't really care about time complexity

Let G1 and G2 be graphs with n vertices.

1. Go over all the n! ways to name the vertices in G1 using the vertex names in G2.
2. With each iteration, check if G1 and G2 are identical after the naming.

I believe you can reduce this from O(n!) to O(2^n) if you use dynamic programming.

>>8718688
Would that be easier than generating permutation matrices?

Me. I would wash my hands so frequently that the skin would get all cracked and wrinkly.

>>8718556
You need to get out more and meet people.
Thats all I have to say.

t.doctor

>>8718556
consider suicide as an alternative to continuing to be a drain on society and before you pass on your broken genetics.

Wish I did, unfortunately you'll just have to power through

I am curious on why you're doing both upper level math and Chem bio.... double major?
If so, that answers your question

If not, your academic advisor is screwing you

Do physics as chemistry and biology are trivial applications that can be left to the reader

Yep, double major. I just find that it's very difficult to transition between mindsets. This becomes especially frustrating in upper level maths courses when I have to recall the mental steps I took to make sense of a theorem. It seems trivial when I'm looking at it one second and in the next it may as well be gibberish.

Because Freud.

>>8718318
Fuck you

Freud was right about 90% of his theories but people only pay attention to the disproven ones

>>8718317
Well-designed psychology research is science. The therapy side of it is mostly pseudo-scientific bullshit. Psychology is too young and the subject matter too complex for application of what we actually know to be fact. Most people only ever see the poorly designed research cause it gets all the hype, and the therapists that don't know jack, hence the feeling about psychology.

>>8718308
>article is about like 6 separate companies proposing non-GSO satellites

>fucking spacex have done it again!

for fuck's sakes,i think elon a cunt too,but try not to be this stupidly dishonest

>>8718338
OP just wrote the most click baity title he could.

>>8718338
>even hint of SpaceX
>Musketeers gets horny and musky
>MuskHaters get riled up and pissy
>collect 400+ replies of general shit
>???
>profit?

Also, wtf is up with the """ part? Are satellites somehow "not real" or something?

>>8718304
>+4 degrees
I thought the warming was expected to be around 2.1.

lol tell that to my man trumo

>>8718311
its under 2 degrees now since the clathrate gun turned out to be a non issue

>>8718148
>tfw you're the 1# support character IRL but everyone else is just too stupid to win the academics
Kill me

File: 220px-GLOCK_19.jpg (8KB, 220x150px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 220x150px

Do you carry in the lab/during the lectures?

File: everyone is stupid but me.jpg (15KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 480x360px

>tfw picked a bad class and threw the game so everybody has to work harder to carry me or it messes up their ELO

hehe, keep paying those taxes, wagecuck.

>>8718143
It is, but CogSci>>>>>all of the shit they took to make this a real thing like Linguistics and Psychology

Prove me wrong, you even have to learn math like a CS but less autism and more research all the time.

>>8718150
>Prove me wrong, you even have to learn math like a CS but less autism and more research all the time.

Maybe. I looked at my alma mater and the CogSci department only required the math need for the specialization (e.g. Discrete Math for CS specialization, Psychology Math for Psych specializations, non for philosophy, etc.).

>>8718143
It's science, but it's really simple science. The methodology and experimental techniques aren't really sophisticated. Nothing can really be quantified in a theoretically meaningful way. The results that have come out of linguistics are nowhere near those of more established sciences. Another issue linguistics has is that there is little consensus. There are a few foundational issues that most people agree on, like the existence of some form of universal grammar, underlying representations in phonology, and phrase structure in syntax, but the details of the implementation of those notions can be wildly different from theory to theory. That said, yes, it is science. I think it's interesting and potentially really valuable, but we have a long way to go.

>>8718139
You posted a link with no description and no one cares enough to investigate.

Best I can do for you is a shitpost.

>>8718139
Sounds like code monkeying
>>>/g/

File: lain16.jpg (3MB, 1920x1200px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1200px

Its a cult some tripfag by the name of "tsuki" started on r9k a whole ago trying to get people to sign up to "have their souls preserved" after the end of this "system" of existence

Study more/harder

>>8718059
>>8718066
/thread
Practice makes perfect anon

>>8718059
because you're trying to memorize it instead of understand it