Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 751. page

>>8723739
science - yes
scientists - not all

>>8723742
This

What's holding us back?

Is this as good as it gets?

nevermind figured it out
he had a strange fascination with sex

He based all of his research no neurotic Jews so he came to the conclusion that everybody was secretly a neurotic jew

>>8723589
Who doesn't?

Who are you quoting?

>>8723563
No one, this is something I was first sexually attracted to but became genuinely interested in.

File: Breast_Annotated.jpg (42KB, 308x320px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 308x320px

Do I have to post pictures of breasts to entice a response like on the other boards?

>>8723424
>So, I want to make some lactic acid, but I'm not sure where to start.
ur body makes it bro, just put a tube in your bones or something

>>8723432
I really want to have the pure thing.
Help, folks.

>>8723424
Just buy it online?

bump is dump

Nope

>>8723182
It's the whole predetermination thing again. Plenty of smart people are convinced either way. You can't really know the answer though, so why does it even matter?

Me, I am just lazy

>>8723141
How the fuck am I supposed to know

Nobody here has met any of the historically great ones and all we have to judge a dead Gauss by is the work he left us

and a bunch of stupid anecdotes that this thread is going to devolve into

File: Dupuy_-_La_vie_d'Évariste_Galois-page54-portrait.jpg (94KB, 453x600px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 453x600px

the one and only

Strange ideas thread?
Close enough.
Whenever I think of anything remotely interesting I type it in my notes on my phone and usually forget about it. Here's one:
>(((We're))) all just fourth dimensional beings passing through the third dimension.
>Fifth dimensionals using fourth dimension as catalyst to pass through third?
>Fourth spacial dimensionals using time dimension as catalyst to pass through third spacial dimensions?
Excuse the crudeness. I've never used any substances for recreational, Incase you're wondering.

>>8723128
>Life and by extension humans are just something that's occurring
That is one of the most semantically vacuous sentences I have ever read.

>>8723198
When you see a tornado spinning and ripping apart things on land do you not look at it as something that is simply occurring due to the right physical conditions?

I never looked at humans and myself and my behavior the same way i looked these occurrences.

But on a fundamental level we're simply occurring, like the different types of weather, due to the right physical conditions just like the weather.

>>8723126
as many as there are in your mother's medicine cabinet

The average tampon holds roughly 5 mL

There is roughly 1,335,000,000 cubic kilometers of water in all oceans on Earth.

That means there are roughly 1.335x10^24 mL in the oceans

so in the end you would need 2.67x10^23 or 267,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 tampons to soak up the oceans

File: 1463230463401.png (132KB, 396x385px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 396x385px

>>8723156
This checks out.

What would your outcome measures for "success in life" be?

>>8723184
Have degree in pure maths?
If [yes] then [congrats! You are successful!]
If [no] then [darn. Better luck next time!]

"lower the bar"


NEXT

>>8723053
Have you considered the fact that the concept of past is meaningless in physics?
Even the concept of time itself is going to have less value as time goes (pun intended) and research shows that time is linked to quantum-gravity, you can think about it as the amount of the vibrations of small particles, this explains the relation between space-time in some manner.
Also, our world is thermodynamical by definition, so the process of time, even if it was something which worths time (pun intended), would be irreversible.

>>8723155
Have you considered the fact that you are an idiot who needs to stop spouting pop pseudoscience?

>>8723155
So it would be meaningless to alter a thought with the power of very subtle suggestion? As in if said subject saw said message, they would disregard it and continue as if the message never mattered?

>>8722966
84.5%

4%

>>8722966
It depends on the game mechanics. A lot of games take the percentage of the original value.

Using your example if they reduced it by 35% and increased by 30% it would end up taking 5% reduced. That's how most game do it.

But if you reduced by 35% and then increased by 30% you would actually end up with an overall reduction of 15.5%.

I suspect the game uses the first mechanic, but I really have no idea.

>>8722972
so in the first 35% 30% he's taking 84.5% of the damage

in the 2nd 20% 30% he's taking 4% extra damage? Only 4? Thought it would be more. Alright thank you.

its easy to work with

Everyone knows how to interpret a slope coefficient.

Many statistical models make assumptions about the data, such as linearity, because the models that don't make such assumptions are more difficult to compute.

the best fast food sandwich

File: hqdefault[4].jpg (6KB, 196x110px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 196x110px

>>8722764
Hey, Vsauce, Michelle here

Here are 5 games that are GUARANTEED to get you laid

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3KVSyQ8J3o4

>tfw normies think science is: dude weed lmao

>>8722461
Leibniz's calculus notation is the one that's used today, not Newton's. So yeah, I think he won.
But for the record, Newton definitely came up with it first, even though Leibnitz posted it earlier. Don't get me wrong, Newton was a crazy asshole and he treated Leibnitz like shit, but eventually he was right.

>>8722479
>But for the anglo psyop record

fixed that for you.

>>8722461
Plagiarism is only applicable if he was too ignorant to appreciate people who chose to help him.
Everyone has built upon what has been before. Others ignore the past to learn and die ignorant.

>>8722452
If you are in high school, it's very incorrect because classic thermodynamics is concerned only with macroscopic descriptions energy transfer. The statement makes no sense because thermodynamics is independent of atomic theory

If you are asking because you are curious/a brainlet wandering wikipedia click this link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistical_mechanics

>>8722502
I read your link and it didn't give me any insight on the OP question. Heat is energy is it not? Where is the energy stored, if not in the atomic level movement?

An einsteinian solid stores energy in 3 dimensional lattice vibrations, 'heat' is the mechanism that transfers energy between these objects. t thermodynamics pro