Prove 1 + 1 ≠ 2
1 + 1 = 10
>>8782894
1+1=0 in Z_2
>>8782894
Dumb frog poster.
>Nobody can read his theories
>not even when the worlds greatest mathmaticians gather at Oxford
>never does interviews
>never leaves japan
>didn't actually publish his work
Why is it not more likely hes insane and we should ignore him than that hes some super genius? Does Occams razor not apply here?
He didn famous work before, that's why people respect him
>>8782731
>He didn famous work before, that's why people respect him
>He is the leader of and main contributor to anabelian geometry; his contributions include a solution of the Grothendieck conjecture in anabelian geometry about hyperbolic curves over number fields.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shinichi_Mochizuki
>>8782712
>>never does interviews
Can anyone find a video of him or new pictures?
What did god mean by this?
>>8782438
>Put the tube they use to breath, right next to the tube they use to swallow.
What did G*d mean by this, is he just a dick?
>>8782438
Is this real.
>>8782452
Yup.
>takes psyc101
>now a psychologist
explain this phenomenon
>reads a fake news article
>believes in climate change and wants their carbon taxed
explain this phenomenon
>takes psych courses
>now a science major
explain this phenomenon
>>8782191
>make sfm porn
>make more money than a science major
Explain this phenomenon
Explain the logic behind this calculation
There is none.
>>8779456
It's compatible with the bible.
Jesus solves.
>>8779456
Maybe swapped addition with multiplication?
Hey /sci/, this is a problem I found on another forum which stumped me, here it is:
Let a,b be in (0,1), show that a^a+b^b >= a^b+b^a.
I ran a simulation and it appears to be true, I tried stuff like "assume that a>b" or assume that "a^a>b^b" but I didnt get anywhere.
This is not a homework problem... Even if it is I think it's pretty interesting
This is the function f(x) = x^x , x = (0,1), in case you need it...
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=x%5Ex+from+0+to+1
well if a=b that solves the "equals to" portion of the problem, and if a>b then a^a will always be greater than a^b and since its all exponentials b^a will never be able to pick up the slack from the a^b term to make up the difference, even if a is large
>>8779013
> if a>b then a^a will always be greater than a^b if a>b then a^a will always be greater than a^b
That is incorrect, if a>b then a^a will always be SMALLER than a^b, because since b is smaller, then a^b will be closer to 1 than a^a.
Also what do you mean by pick up the slack, could you elaborate on that please?
Is free will a lie?
>>8778491
Yes, beacuse you are extorted to not do some things
>>8778491
I'm forced to say no
>>8778491
who knows
0.999...=1
prove me wrong
protip: you can't
>>8773303
Pic related is not entirely anatomically correct
>>8773303
DORON PLS OWN THIS FEG
>>8773303
It's approximately one, not one.
So how did everyone's finals go?
>>8771582
Semester's not yet done for me. Where do you study to be finishing so early?
>>8771582
Shit dude I just got done midterms
my finals are in one month, where do you study OP? >>8771582
What are the most retarded classes you had to take in your university. This is what you are going to study if you went to a shithole public uni in M'laysia
>Ethnic Relations
>Islamic and Asian Civilisations
>Malaysian Statehood
These classes are terribly boring and filled with obvious propaganda. Also they're compulsory to take.
>>8771076
>Norwegian
>English
>Technology in society ( Which is basicly history and the philosophy of technology evolving.)
>>8771076
I had to take two classes of English language.
Intrapersonal communications
the teacher basically just used it as his chance to spew bullshit with a captive audience. Ended up having to draw a picture about my feelings for credit among other BS
Why hasn't anyone found a formula for finding the nth prime, /sci/?
Genuinely disturbs me, we've had this clearly defined set of numbers for thousands of years and nobody has found a formula for generating the nth prime.
What gives, /sci/? Is it impossible or are we as a species just too stupid to find it?
>>8786078
The formula and proof was posted a week ago, retard.
I found it, will release data for $10 million
>>8786078
There are algorithms, they are just extremely slow.
One popular argument for spending so much of money on exploring space is that it has practical benefits and is in humanity's best interests to do so.
Why then would you not open source everything? Data, discoveries, software, hardware designs, simulations, etc. It would advance science a lot faster if everybody had access to all this data.
>>8786048
Because we live in a shitty corrupt world, same reason that the 'so much money' isn't anywhere near as much as it should be.
>>8786048
Opensource will make it easier for other governments to find vulnerabilities in your system and destroy your mission.
>>8786048
>it has practical benefits and is in humanity's best interests to do so
kek
astrophysics is literally a glorified science fiction.
No, it is a preparatory school for children
>Hogwarts is stuffed with masses of children
>Very few adults supervising anything
>Hormones running wild
Everyone there should be fucking like animals. Rowling is a shitty writer
seeing as it only existed in a overrated children's novel, i can't really provide my professional opinion on it
Ever been in a dark room and stare at one object or single point?
For me, this shroud of blackness begins to creep over my visual field.
If I stop focusing my eyes or move them a little, the black shroud is removed and my surroundings return to normal.
Is there a name for that black shroud?
nah
>>8785528
Death.
>>8785528
It's called The Void.
Enter it.
("Doooooo doo doo-doo d'doo")
Does this increase IQ?
>>8785249
>brain damage
Probably.
This actually strengthens the brain muscle. This is why the Soviets still use it today. Why do you think they are so good at Chess?
>>8785249
hell, even watching this has added half a dozen points to my left hemisphere