Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 676. page

>>8795325
[math] c - \epsilon [/math]

getting sucked into the black hole

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gAHf6I9P5A

>>8795237
Some quadratic equations have more primes than others. Deal with it, marxists.

File: magnet-with-iron-filings-showing-lines-of-magnetic-field-converging-BPCR6E.jpg (475KB, 888x1390px) Image search: [Google]

475KB, 888x1390px

>>8795237
that always looked like pic related to me

>>8795237
Kind of reminds me of a basketball.

>>8794514
london?

>>8794514
more details are necessary for a comprehensive diagnosis

>>8794516
yes, actually

Are you a scientist

>>8794393
Anon just invented staged rockets.

>>8794393
That's pretty much already what rockets do.

Look up the rocket equation.

Yes but there is a theoretical limit for a given amount of fuel in which there are infinite stages and the assumption that stage separators have no weight.

Pretty neat right?

>>8794336
Its a neat fanfic but where is the science?

Yeah that's great and all except there's no evidence whatsoever that more than the 1 universe exists. Multi-universe "theory" is on the same level as the rambling of a stoner after a big bong rip

Let them dream of a better future.
The truth is humanity will die in our semen encrusted VR pods.

File: watdo.png (181KB, 1224x626px) Image search: [Google]

181KB, 1224x626px

>>8790940
Ignorance is a helluva drug.

>>8790954
>Let them dream of a better future.

Why not inform them so they can dream of a realistic future that can actually be done?

File: gennise_project_moon_base_a.jpg (37KB, 518x203px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 518x203px

>>8790940
Whole planet doesn't need to change, it can simply be changed on a local cluster basis with proper shielding technology.

>>8789961
imo chimps yes dolphins no

i think chimps have far more potential to utilize tools, then the ones that do it best will naturally thrive and the ones that dont can go on some sort of chimp welfare system

all dolphins can do is blow bubbles and shit

>>8789961
Dolphins are the second smartest organisms on Earth followed by humans.

>>8790100
Dolphins are smarter than humans.
Mice are the smartest organisms.

>>8789190
Maybe Bm = v*c^c

>>8789190

"No".

>>8789190
Would the world maintaining the simulation have speed limits?

Also 'cant go faster than light' is stupid concept. It doesn't feel beautiful, which is the only true criteria for choosing your physical reality.

rate of change

Shut up brainlet

>>8787001
Why is asteroid impact a problem?

Hasn't the planet been bombarded by asteroid trough it's history? Haven't we always have had mass extinction, with species come and go due to asteroid impacts?

Why are naturalist so concerned about this? Shouldn't they be the ones letting the planet go trough with it's natural cycles, getting bombarded with asteroids rather than doing everything they can to keep it in an unnaturally static state?

I have heard that it can improve brain function but I think there's also very little research on this or any other aspect of the keto diet so who the fuck knows.

>>8786609
You already are, so go ahead.

>>8786609
I've thought about it too, would cardio counteract the negative side-effects?

Nigga what the fuck?

>>8784833
I would prefer scientific/philosophical responses only thanks.

>>8784830
only brainless can understand brainless

>>8784666
He's a model, you daft faggot.

>>8784670
That's not an answer, retard

>>8784666
He'd laugh at you for mumbling like a sperg and then go have a productive, fulfilling social life

>>8795502
Pretty much.

>>8795502
Electron spin isn't actually a spin dumbass

Only brainlets fall for the no mono-pole meme.

5D = A "square space" in which a timeline can exist in any form within the boundaries of the square. The timeline can bend into itself, essentially meaning it's possible to visit previous or future points of time contained in this timeline. Two timelines cannot interact, otherwise once again, to the observer it just appears as one timeline. This means we still only have one timeline but a 5D being can view any point of the timeline at will by bending it in on itself, however this being cannot actually change the timeline, only visit various points. Using our video example, the 5D viewer can now jump to any point in the video he wants without having to view the parts in between.
6D = The space in which multiple 5D "squares" form a "cube". These squares each represent the space where separate timelines exist, however within the cube, a timeline can exist in multiple squares meaning timelines can branch off or exist independently but still not touch each other or once again, it's a single timeline. Using the picture, one 5D square is pink, one is green and one is blue; these three form a cube in 6D space. Now let's say each timeline is only composed of three points in time referred to as point A, B and C. A timeline can still exist entirely in the pink square, or point A and B of the timeline could occur in pink whereas point C occurs in green. Point A, B and C could also occur in the pink, green and blue squares respectively, however it's impossible for point C to occur in the blue square if A and B are both in the pink square, and vice versa. This means there's still limits to the forms a timeline can take. Once again with our video example, now we have three different videos. Within the aforementioned constraints, a 6D being could watch sections of one video combined with sections of another.

Continued one more time:

7D = A line composed of our 6D cubes which to us is essentially the same thing as 3D cubes in a row viewed from the side as 2D squares which a being existing in 2D would view as a 1D line. Back to the video example in the 6D example, the 7D being can view the sections of the different videos in any order he wants.
8D = The space in which our 7D line exists, meaning the 7D line can now interact with itself suggesting our limits explained in the 6D section are no longer relevant. Not sure how to continue the video example.
9D = Extrapolate nigga

>>8795495
Your concept of time is misguided. Just like how you go from:
0-D: A point
1-D: A line made of translating the point
2-D: A square made from translating the line in another dimension
3-D: A cube made from translating the square into another dimension
4-D: You are translating these 3-D object through time.

You have trouble visualizing this because in your experience, you've only ever seen one slice of time at a time. It would be like seeing only one slice of a cube (a square).

>>8795361
If so, would the concept of personal realities play a huge role in the process of trans-versing through the various realities which are laid out in front of you?

It should be firstly noted that one of the most common misconceptions about QM is that consciousness plays any factor into it. What throws everyone off is the use of the word "observe".

A wave function isn't collapsed when somebody thinks "I'm gonna give this a look," and observes it. Once some particle or such interacts with an object is when the wave function collapses.

>>8795369
So how you think an outcome will result does not determine how you will interpret the outcome to transpire or result?