Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 662. page

>>8807076
that's hot OP
it's probably neither outdated nor more accurate; just different.

>>8807076
Some are done with a direct urethral swab (HPV) and some through urine (chlamydia).

Others are done entirely throught blood (HIV and syphilis).

It depends what they were testing for.

>>8807076
Did you cum?

it would be taken down in no time.

>>8806736
How hard would it be for a government to safely take down a satellite they have no control over? Do you think a bunch of pirate satellites orbiting earth would be good incentive for governments to increase funds for their space programs?

>>8806743
MPAA would develop their own line of sat-killer satellite drones and launch them to go after the pirate internet satellites eventually causing Kessler syndrome and cutting off space to humans for 10k years.

Obvious things I already figured out:
1.If you can prove that it's impossible to fill every square, you prove that it's impossible to do what's asked.
2.Since you have to do a loop, the starting point technically doesn't matter. Although it doesn't prove anything, it might make it easier to determine whether it's possible to do what's asked.
3.From testing multiple times, it seems impossible to do the loop. Haven't clearly figured out why yet.
4.Since the starting point doesn't matter, proving that going on every square exactly once isn't possible by starting off one of the squares in a grid of 3x4 in any corner, you prove is for the rest of the grid since you can just rotate/mirror it to prove the rotated/symmetrical cases.

File: grid 2.jpg (131KB, 723x521px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 723x521px

More specific facts:
1.If you arrive at the one of the extremities of the red paths, you have to go through the entire red path, because otherwise you end up with an impossible case.
2.If you land into one of the points of the blue loop, you have to complete the loop otherwise you end up with a failed attempt again. You also have to make sure that when going into the blue loop, you have a way out.
3.I'm unsure about this, but it probably doesn't matter whether you first fill out the squares that go through the blue/red paths before going through the "undetermined" path. This idea comes from the fact that since it's a loop, you have to go through the blue/red paths at some point anyway, so since the starting point is free to choose, choosing to complete the paths first or last doesn't matter. It's also probable that the blue/red paths need to be followed one right after the other, since some of the red paths extremities correspond to the entry/exit points of the blue loop.

File: grid 3.jpg (76KB, 734x530px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 734x530px

So, my current strategy is to prove that for any of the upper right squares with a pink corner marker lead to a case where you fail.
The squares with a pink marker indicate every square that is not one the blue/red paths from previous picture.
So, for every of these squares, with the blue/red paths logic in mind, I might be able to prove that you always end up in a failed attempt.
At this point it's still backtracking though so I need to figure out further logical aspects to be able to justify myself.

>>8806418

Not sure if there is a device that can reach that high of an efficiency, there are too many physical boundaries to overcome

>>8806418

There are none, PM is impossible even in theory because of time and entropy.

File: 1487982155781.jpg (81KB, 600x536px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 600x536px

>he unironically uses the word unity.

>>8806229
>"division"
This meme needs to die.
It's just a special case of multiplication.

Tensor calculus quotient rule is where it becomes a true meme

>>8806229
im in my first year of college now, taking calculus
i read ahead on all the material and understand it all very well
quotient rule is my personal favorite, i am a master at it.
i enjoy talking to my professor after class.
one time, we were in class and he asked what a real number was and i said ``convergent cauchy sequence''
his eyes lit up but he continued with the lecture
afterwards, we bounced mathematical ideas off each other. he told me to look at analytic number theory and i gotta say its quite interesting
it feels nice to be ahead of the curve

red bull
working with classmates
asking respectfully for extensions
starting work as soon as you get it assigned

modafinil

Suicide.

>>8806007
do your own homework

File: 1488433171905.png (2MB, 990x1146px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 990x1146px

>>8806012
?
im not asking for answers just questions you animal.

>>8806007

i understood the first two lines desu !

>Why are things like this not more well known in popular culture or popular understanding?

You could ask this question about anything. It's because people are far more stupid and less interested than you give them credit for.

>>8805246
Yes, but understanding things from the basis of pattern recognition actually improves how you think. Especially when it comes to science, religion, etc debates.

It gives a far better foundation for understanding the world. I actually think we would probably be best off teaching everything off the basis of a pattern language rather than math.

>>8805241
It's obvious, so there was no reason to discuss it

>>8805160
Im assuming you grabbed it and then embarrassed him in front of everyone. Its a disease called mental illness. Its untreatable and permanent.

>>8805160
To prove how careless people are with their stuff.

>>8805160
They are junkies getting off on the chemical thrill of getting away with it and/or the chemical guilt of possibly/actually being caught.
Sounds like your guy is into cocktails.

>>8803547
Solid State

market feasibility

>>8804944
This.

Probably made out of layered graphene.

noether can she

Criminally underrated

Seriously though, why doesn't anyone talk about her? Whenever people try to name female scientists, they can only think of Curie.

>>8803332
Curie was unique not only because of her work, but also because she was a Polish immigrant in France, a frontline nurse in WW1, and died rather ironically of radium poisoning.

Noether was just a hard-working researcher and teacher, she never wanted recognition for herself.

I find it kinda strange that both of these women were really "humble" and did not seek glory, while it seems some guys like Heisenberg and the like were extremely full of themselves (rightly so.)

File: image020.gif (50KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 480x360px

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overwhelmingly_Large_Telescope

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molten-Salt_Reactor_Experiment
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integral_fast_reactor

>>8802721
What's next, the inconceivably tremendously fuckhuge telescope?

>>8802452
I wonder what the ratio of dead bee/loss of life is.

>>8802452
We're doing pretty well on that so far. I'd just let people kesp going like they're going. Maybe start assassinating scientists trying to stop it from happening.

>>8802452
selectively breed a super race of varroa mites and release billions of them into the world

File: Screen Shot 2017-04-02 at 9.02.00 PM.png (251KB, 956x306px) Image search: [Google]

251KB, 956x306px

>>8799505

>>8799505
Who's Ted and why is he in prison?

>>8799508
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Kaczynski

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o96XsGoWwSM

File: Capture.png (470KB, 767x653px) Image search: [Google]

470KB, 767x653px

Why do they all look so androgynous?

File: Screen Shot 2017-04-01 at 2.06.50 AM.png (69KB, 838x691px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 838x691px

OP here to show my scores across the board.

>>8795814
explain to me why it is worth my time to even take this test