Thinks that free body diagrams are useless wastes of time. I can imagine the forces in my head and add them and subtract them accordingly. I don't need this confusing piece of shit method to confuse me even more about something that is supposed to be simple. Anyone else hate how normies complicate things, math especially?
>>8935869
keep bumping anon i'm sure you'll find a brainlet who agrees with you.
>>8935869
well, if you've only done systems where it's really easy to keep track of every force in your head, there are two possibilities:
a) you've only studied incredibly basic systems of forces, and therefore your opinion is total shit, you are unqualified, and you suck
or,
b) you have genius level spatial intelligence and memory and can keep track of complicated changing systems in your head
I give it a 99.999999% chance that you're just doing FBDs of balls rolling down hills and shit like that and that you fall into category (a)
>>8935869
7/10
We might be brains in a vat. Occam's razor suggests we shouldn't assume that true. But what if William of Ockham was a brain in a vat himself that came up with his Razor theory that got him stuck in a catch 22 about his own existence.
If anything, quantum physics is demonstrating we are brains in a vat that have started to figure out the vat.
>>8935860
dont ever talk shit about ockam
Why is so much money being invested into autonomous vehicles? Who would let themselves be driven on a highway by these things? Who would want to be on a road with a robotic 16-wheeler?
Someone explain this shit. I can't see this ever happening
because nobody wants to pay truckers.
people who think so little of their time they would waste it commuting do not think very much at all
Europe already has remotely controlled semis.
Robots still drive infinitely better than people because they don't get distracted or drunk, or fall asleep at the wheel.
Form a counteragument against social darwinism without sounding like a soccer mom that is trying to cheer up her depressed kid.
(E.g: You just gotta believe and try hard honey and you can be anything you want.)
>>8935290
i can't. and that's where we were logically headed in the beginning of the 20th century before that moron of hitler had to sperg out. this cult of human rights is simply the reaction to hitler's fuckup
>>8935290
>moral arguments from scientific facts
>>8935290
>>there is literally no scientific evidence that supports social darwinism
I think scientists don't know everything about how evolution turned into consciousness.
What I think is life started out like little machines that are able function in some way, shape, or form. (Started out as lightning striking at chemicals) for billions of years until eventually a molecular machine forms that is able to do carry out a set of tasks like manipulate atoms randomly until it evolves into something like a calculator, that's able to calculate, compute, store data, and make changes to it's surroundings (the environment consisting of molecules and atoms)
Watch this video showing a visual simulation put together through microscopic research of how DNA works and how the molecular machines copy it to form new cells.
https://youtu.be/f9ff4FQ39CE
Those machines look very complicated and (machine) like, Extremely (machine) like. Probably what these molecular machines evolved into.
They might of been copying themselves and creating new ones so they could work together to do more calculations. And have some of them go out and get fuel to keep them going.
What if all those machines were doing extreme calculations on the universe and how it worked and had some sort of artificial intelligent like behaviour and kept doing calculations because that's what it does. And it just needed to be more complicated so it could learn more about the universe and how it works. And learn about laws of physics. So it just kept doing a set of theoretical 2d, 3d, 4d, and so on calculations until it came up with a theory to mess with a segment within the fabric of the universe and transform it. I'm not talking about moving the atoms and molecules around, but messing with what's within the atoms until it finds the very fabric of the universe and how it existingly exists and what if it was messing with that doing crazy modifications to it manipulating it in a way that it's able to turn a segment of it into some type of artificial awareness.
Why don't animals seem to show intelligent behaviour? Because maybe these machines were copying themselves too much and each machine was messing with different segments within the fabrics of the universe (a group of different atoms and molecules) creating more machines with awarenesses, and they needed resources, so they started programming them and their awarenesses to start consuming different machines which had fuel so that they could keep going.
And what happened? They needed to change their awareness so that they didn't have to think, because thinking about the crazy complicated things they were calculating and theorizing would only slowed them down so they programmed their brains to keep the calculating going while their awareness focused on survival, instinct, and action.
So the machines before they created themselves an awareness were probably doing intense Google bytes of calculations per plank time for millions of years to come up with something as complicated as an awareness with sensory, learning, meaning, chemical exchanges they know as emotions, and eventually today they were able to make the awareness so complicated that its able to perform knowledge and understanding, so that maybe today we can do way more than what the machines were able to do millions of years ago
evolution machine broke
Does penis size correlate inversely with intelligence?
>>8934445
Strangely enough, yes. That probably has to do with blood flow going to the brain not the penis.
That correlation doesn't make sense if we compare ourselves with other apes though. Gorillas are a lot dumber than us and have tiny dicks.
>>8934445
It does not
>>8934459
http://www.quickextenderpro.com/blog/three-bizarre-findings-studies-worldwide-penis-sizes/
Autism or Autistic gets throw around here alot but what about it's hyper unfocused cousin?
>>8934130
how do I delete a thread that others aren't interested in? Just wait?
>>8934130
Yes, but it's totally getting blown out of proportion. The fact that a shitload of diagnoses got made after Ritalin got released is something that you should keep in the back of your head.
There is only so few ways for a face to be aligned. How come everyone has a different fucking face? It doesn't make sense. I had this crush on this girl in 7th grade, because she had such a unique face and I haven't seen it ever since--no girl comes close and now I'm salty as fuck.
>>8933757
You'd be suprise how many people look very similar. I think it may just be a result of a very large gene pool, and each person's face is a unique creation of the genes of their parents.
>>8933757
humans are good at reconizing faces, and we can pick up subtle details. Stil, faces come in many different shapes
same grill?
Is this furry right about Climate change?
oops fail, here is the link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SRY5nEXOMQ
>>8933717
Oh crap it's a real furry.
And yes, Trump it's always wrong about science because he's a real state shark that can't see beyond their pockets interest.
>>8933720
stop shilling your youtube channel you disgusting furry or whatever you dragon weirdos call yourselves
>people actually believe that gender != sex
Oxford Dictionary sites...
Gender: The state of being male or female
Sex: Either of the two main categories (male and female) into which humans and most other living things divide themselves into
Although with slight variations regarding interpetation, it could be said that for the most part both definitions are similar if not the same
>>8933429
When will these dipshits realise...
>>8933429
Most countries don't even have words to distinguish between those concepts. It's pretty much an anglo thing.
Rockets are shit you can't even land them. No one will ever explore relatively safe in space until you get a fighter type jet in space with steroided engines. A rocket can't land it's designed to explode thus the people inside it explode.
what
>>8932703
/thread
>>8932703
Still, so risky it's unbelievable I've seen the video it's not safe. Safety is about control you can't control that so it's not safe. Back to making fighter jets that can dock and have acceleration control in space, not rockets that will veer into your ship or station and blow a hole into it killing everything and everyone inside because that's what rockets do. The whole design is an arrow.
I'm not riding in a flying arrow designed to Spear me into whatever object it comes across.
What's the likelihood we'll see something like this in the next 50 years?
Is the turbojet going to stick around for a while, or is there really a chance for something like a SST powered by a reactor or batteries this half century?
>>8932023
We don't need to make them electric. We could use cryogenic hydrogen. Or better yet, use that cryogenic hydrogen to power fucking insane fuel cells that power motors with superconducting magnets. By insane I mean having to move a lot of air and get rid of a lot of water.
You should be able to calculate the basic feasibility of such things from first principles. Once you got a model for wave drag you're all set. I don't feel like doing this right now.
>>8932054
see, I'd be thinking that the military would be dumping money into something like this. I'd eliminate the issue of IR tracking for missiles, and since they already have stealth down for radar, it'd render a plane a hole in the sky that'd only be able to be hit with optical tracking.
>>8932062
Radar stealth is obsolete, electronic are much better now.
A fidget spinner is currently at rest. It has a radius of 50 centimeters and its rotational inertia is equal to 50 kgm^2.
If a force of 10N at an angle of 30 degrees, how many full rotations does it rotate in 3 seconds?
>>8931965
Fuck you
>>8931965
>50 cm radius fidget spinner
Brainlets aren't welcome here
>>8931969
Who says they don't exist?
>There is a 99% chance if humanity doesn't manage to colonize other bodies in the solar system within the next 100 years we'll go extinct
Why isn't leaving Earth our #1 priority right now? Do people not realize how fragile our existence on this planet is? All it would take is a single extinction level event to occur and that's it. The only intelligent species in the universe dies out. If we want humanity to continue existing we MUST leave Earth and create self sustaining colonies on other worlds
>>8931898
>There is a 99% chance if humanity doesn't manage to colonize other bodies in the solar system within the next 100 years we'll go extinct
you got a source for that there fact?
>we'll go extinct
and why not? what's so great about us...
>>8931928
Cuck
>mfw someone says a set can be "infinite" near me
>>8931878
Consider the set of your mothers sexual partners. QED
>>8931882
>>8931882