Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 499. page

>>8937546
probably numberphile on youtube

Why would you study that?

>>8937555
Its interesting

some

>>8937398
I think they're sponges.

>>8937398
No they're algae

>>8936290
Please reread your book or stop trolling

>>8936290
Anon, RNA is not "one molecule". It is a chain of ribose molecules linked together via phosphate groups, with a base (Adenine, guanine, uracil or cytosine) attached to the 1' location of each of the riboses.

Chain lengths can vary and base composition also varies, so it wouldn't make sense for there to be 'one composition'. Usually, non-repetitive polymers like DNA, RNA and proteins are written down as a linear sequence of their components.

Just, fucking, read the wikipedia page or your textbook holy shit.

Also, the 'ribosome' and the 'ribose' are two different things. The ribosome is a piece of cellular machinery and the ribose is a sugar molecule.

>>8936333
all races are equal

>>8935899
Im guessing counterexample, c'mon bro that's textbook

>>8935901
can't. has to be generalized.

>>8935902
what fucks me up is that
<u+v,u+v> = <u,u> + 2<u,v> + <v,v> which is > than <u,u> + <v,v>
so how can their magnitudes be smaller
logically it makes sense to me but the math is fucking me up

>>8935593
I have no personal experience with it but my understanding is that "synthetic weed" could be any one of several chemicals, some of which may not be that bad. But it's not sold for human consumption so they basically have no responsibility to actually tell you what it is. It could be bad.

>>8935593
They're basically research chemicals that resemble the thc molecule but have totally different effects

One friend of mine told me he tried it once (unwittingly) and it made him feel full on psychotic

https://youtu.be/mhV2n0Mlucw

>>8934998
diphantone equation thing so really fucking big
natural numbers
qed.
like really fucking big numbers

>>8934998
https://mathoverflow.net/questions/227713/estimating-the-size-of-solutions-of-a-diophantine-equation

Then multiply the whole thing by 4.

>>8935034
>Then multiply the whole thing by 4.
explain how multiplying a, b and c by any common factor will ever change the value of that expression

is this a joke?

>>8932353
>hey can you help me make this product that I plan to sell even though I don't know any of the science needed and you would be doing all of the work and also I won't pay you
Why should I not just make this myself?

File: 1495595715789.png (3KB, 284x115px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 284x115px

>>8932353
>>8932378

Somebody clearly hasn't seen "the entire history of the world, i guess."

>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xuCn8ux2gbs&t=

You're welcome.

>>8931023
1. Which god?
2. Out of the thousands invented, how do you know it's that particular god?
3. Why does that god exist?

File: 1486165390643.jpg (97KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 500x500px

>>8931043
Look. I already watched this video. The very idea of a Big Bang doesn't make any sense. Was it a nothing that somehow became an everything? Or was it an everything that was always just there somehow? If the former, what made nothing become everything, and if the latter, what created this every thing that was always there? This doesn't answer any point in the OP at all. Cause and effect.

>>8935293
Only if you wanna get an actual research job where you're not just a lab monkey pipetting stuff but rather participate in original research under a lab head. This is how it is with all science degrees, the real jobs are available to the PhDs and postdocs that can later become research assistants.

Lab monkeying is about the most realistic job choice you have with only a bachelor in the life sciences if we're talking scientific jobs. But you should know by now that repeating the same braindead experimental protocols every day is extremely tedious. If you enjoy it though, go for it. Most people think PhD when they imagine research, however.

>>8935293
>Microbiology
>>8935332
This hit the nail on the head.
Field bio has the best research options for bachelors, you'd still be an assistant. Unless you are skilled and good at networking, then you can bullshit your way to higher postions(which will probably be a postgrad research program)
Jobs are lame, don't buy into the corporate dogma. Aim to become a researcher or drop out because you will hate your life doing capitalized science.

>>8935341
What's wrong with doing SCIENCE?

>>8933598
Hack and fedora.

File: 1467989036090.jpg (6KB, 273x204px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 273x204px

>>8933598
A nigger?

he's mostly an entertainer and partially a physicist

it's garbage

Get it without the motor drive, the motor drive mount is garbage but the standard EQ mount is great
Overall the scope is good and I adore mine

>>8936941
Had one after falling for the stargazing live meme and sold it.

Was great for the moon, shit for everything else.

>ahh yes Mars is a very slightly red dot
>ahh yes stars
>this is boring

>>8936890
not surprised

>>8936890
I can see this blowing up /pol/

>>8936890
Well, one of the founders of the Big Bang theory was a priest. I think the Catholic Church has always been more aware than the Presidency.

We know very well how reality functions on a macroscopic scale and we know very little on how it functions on the smallest of scales.

>>8936835
That's odd; you'd think so much uncertainty (pun not intended) on a quantum and below scale would make for very big discrepancies in macroscopic scale projections.

>>8936893
the classic analogy is like rolling a dice

roll 6*10^30 dices (die?) and you're going to get 10^30 1's, to many decimal places -- if this was something in the real world that you were measuring, it's going to be close enough to 10^30 that your sensors aren't going to be able to tell the difference.

Meanwhile, roll a dice once, and try predicting what you're going to get, or why you got it. Absurdly complicated.

All the "quantum fluctuations" effectively end up cancelling each other out on macro scales due to law of large numbers

>meaningless question
We can only observe that it did

File: descending bear.gif (477KB, 268x201px) Image search: [Google]

477KB, 268x201px

cooked meat

Honestly my opinion is to better predict the future, which is literally one of the most advantageous aspects of being alive.

Sorry about the half greentext, half not I was busy daydreaming and forgot I was greentexting

>>8936574
What does the functioning of kidneys feel like?

>>8936576
Its like a small suction feeling, almost like if you put a straw on the end of your finger and suck on the other end.