Why are all STEM enthusiasts always pure nihilists?
>>8940200
i mean narcissists
>>8940203
kek
small penis size probably
>>8940200
>STEM enthusiasts
You mean popsci faggots?
Has science killed anyone else's sex drive?
Ever since I started studying seriously, I've lost the desire to masturbate even when I want to.
I can still ejaculate fine, but I have to work to keep it up and nothing really stimulates me like it used to.
I exercise every day and take supplements that are supposed to increase testosterone levels, but nothing works.
Should I just kill myself?
me too. Don't have to worry about keeping it up though.
>>8939613
Hell no. Sex is always a good time. You should probably just get laid.
So you associate sex drive with masturbation? Fucking degenerate.
Have you ever even seen a pussy?
What's the most scientifically-accurate religion and why is it Bhuddism.
>Conciousness begets reality
>Meditation is positive for your health
>Auras exist as proven by Kirlian Photography
>The sound Om, when chanted, vibrates at the frequency of 432 Hz, which resonates with the frequency of 8 Hz, the Schumann Resonance
where did you find this pile of shit picture
>>8939574
Wow! There's a lot of homologies between different phenomena in nature! I would haven't known that! Buddha was clearly the best.
>>8939574
bhuddism is like a plug in for different religions tho, its not necessarily a religion unto itself.
ITT: Discussion mathematicians with super-human intelligence.
I'll start (in no particular order):
Srinivasa Ramanujan
John von Neumann
Walter Pitts
Kurt Gödel
Marion Tinsley
neil degrass tyson
>ramanujan, aka Tesla of maths
>genius
Good joke mate
>>8938331
>Srinivasa Ramanujan
I always wonder about what really happened with his 1729.
Did he previously know that fact, maybe by chance, and then when Hardy mentioned the number he remembered?
Or when Hardy said that 1729 was not special did his mind literally trigger superhuman abbility and he started scanning all possibilities for how 1729 could be a special number and in less than a second he computed that 1729 could be written in two different ways as the sum of two cubes.
No one will ever know
>I believe that the climate is changing, but I don't believe that it's manmade
>C-climate has always changed in the past, this time is no different
Only bumping this shit thread because I loved that anime and thought it was grossly underrated.
I dont care what you think
Youre just a brainlet
>>8935849
What's the title?
The largest black holes currently known have about 20 billion times the mass of the sun and dwarf our entire solar system from the sun out to Pluto in terms of the dimensions of their event horizon.
Not only that, if you were to wait one year for every particle in the universe, about 100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 years, you would see the black hole shrink in size by only about .00000001 percent in mass from Hawking radiation, assuming that nothing fell into it and you somehow blocked any and all radiation from going into it.
Consider a region of empty space. Is it stuck in time? It has no mass or velocity, so isnt it outside of time?
T. Non astronomer
>>8933976
the range of gravity is infinite.
>>8933905
On the set of the Original Spider Man movie, Willem Dafoe would bring a humongous foot long green dildo and smack people with it
I posted here a while ago lamenting that I wasn't going to finish my thesis that was "due" in a month. Anons on here all encouraged me that I could do it if I tried and a thesis isn't that difficult. Today I sent the final draft, cleared by my adviser, to the committee. Thanks /sci/, I defend in 2 weeks.
>>8943865
Nigga what
Explain the meme pic. Asking for a friend.
>>8943869
They're both Stokes' Theorem, however, one equation is larger and more complex. This implies that the other guy has a fatter wiener and better sex skills.
Can someone tell me where to find the original Nada Report for 2408 airfoils? desperate aerospace engineer here.
>>8943652
first result on google you fucking fagguette
maybe you shouldn't google so much gay porn.
>>8943655
ORIGINAL Naca Report, not a third party one bud
>>8943652
Run your own simulation in Abaqus or other CAE of your choice famalam
So, is it safe to say that extraterrestrial sentient life is almost non-existent, or at least the probability of its existense is extremeley low?
Is homo sapiens a random mistake of evolution?
Extrapolate an extremely low probability across a universe with billions and billions of Earth-type planets.
But, no. It isn't 'safe to say', anyway. That would be an assumption for which there is no evidence. It appears from observing life on Earth that it will develop in the most inhospitable and bizarre conditions. There's no reason to assume that life wouldn't develop elsewhere, and that sentience would follow.
And is the relentless movement of evolution to more complex and adaptable forms a 'mistake'? Again, if us sentients were a random mutation or aberration, the sheer number of other planets capable of supporting life would guarantee it would happen again, someplace.
>>8943558
What if animals are the aliens, but we can't communicate with them because we lack basic underlying axioms of understanding?
>>8943558
>>8943584
It's not sentience that is the random aberration, it's life itself. To go from
>literally random compounds in aquatic solution, with some kind of energy gradient
to
>a little machine carrying all the information necessary to replicate itself inside it in some kind of representative format, plus the molecular machinery necessary to translate that information into the physical form of another, identical little machine, all with high enough fidelity that the whole process doesn't crap out in 1 generation from destructive mutation
is one hell of a probabilistic leap. I think it's almost certain Earth has the only life in the observable universe, let alone the galaxy. Remember, if the origin of life was easy, it should have arisen multiple times on earth - but everything is descended from one common ancestor.
In mathematics, we start from a set of axioms and deduce the whole theory, piece by piece.
How do we "prove" physical theory? By experiments? From some 'physical' axioms?
>>8943508
Physical experimentation.
>>8943508
Nothing in physics is proven.
Physics has laws that operate the same way mathematics has axioms. The difference is that these laws have to be observed. I might be wrong, but aren't axioms arbitrarily defined? I'm using arbitrary loosely because I'm sure there is a better term.
I start my first semester in college studying mathematics this fall.
What can I expect?
Math
>>8943307
beer pong
beer math
If you're a 20 year old virgin man, does that mean you're likely intelligent?
>>8943191
Also, I've never kissed a girl before on top of this.
>>8943191
Well, you are not the only one in the same situation, anon. What do you study?
>>8943208
I'm not in college yet, but I'm going in for computer science and marketing.
>aced every chemistry exam
>failed the lab
>school has policy where you fail class if you fail lab
What is the easiest way to end myself?
>>8943003
There's no easy way to end yourself if you failed the lab
>>8943003
drink acid. I thought you passed every chemical exam? you should know this.
>>8943007
kekk'd
A bus left the Scarlet Devil Mansion. Three people boarded at the start. At Hakugyokurou, one got off, and half a person boarded. At Yakumo's house, two people left.
So how many passengers in total?
Objection. Youmu is not half a person. Youmu is one person who is half ghost.
One (1) dork.
>>8942942
Something something none something something no buses on something something.
Does anyone know what is this?
A faggot
>>8942821
Looks like a faggot, why do you ask?