What does this mean? What would happen if the cost decreased to $0.1?
>>9162469
It means employers can finally mandate cheap genetic tests so that they can filter out retards and drug addicts.
>cost per genome
People will buy more genomes?
Hell, at 0.1$ they would give genomes for free.
maybe if we ran short of genomes, the price would rise again
What is the correct order for learning algebra, analytical geometry and calculus?
Currently I'm doing Basic Mathematics by Lang and after that I plan to finish algebra then move to precalculus then eventually calculus. I don't know where analytical geometry fits in all this.
Also, what books do you people recommend for algebra and analytical geometry?
BUMP
>>9162455
i read larson-hostelter precalculus but skipped the additional analytical geometry topics (ch10)
then you need to learn limits and hyperbolas, cause some calc textbooks omit them. after that you go into calculus.
i went from knowing 0 math to finishing calc 2 in 2 months flat, it's not that hard. good algebra is basically the most important thing to know
>>9162455
I think it goes
calculus -> real analysis -> complex analysis-> topology -> smooth manifolds -> differential geometry -> complex manifolds and Hodge theory
calculus -> algebra -> commutative algebra -> algebraic geometry (classical) -> algebraic geometry (postmodern)
and then you have the proper prereqs for analytic geometry
why 73 is a prime number?
>>9160196
Because it is not divisible by anything other than one and itself
And because you touch yourself at night
>>9160200
73 : 0.5 = 146
>>9160196
It's not divisible by any positive integer besides 1 and itself.
Please register your heriditary complaint. Tell us, who is your son or daughter and what macegenic effects are you specifically concerned with regarding their specific breeding partner.
>>9164943
Male Pattern Baldness.
>scientists can stop light but can't stop balding
>>9164960
>>9164943
I don't like my daughter boyfriends JEW NOSE (Hurr hurr hurr hyuk hyuk hyuk)
and who he was?
Yeah. That's why he had a portrait of him in his office.
>>9164864
well its possible that in a pre-internet, he would of had no knowledge about him
i mean did 17th century English scholars know about Aristotle or Plato?
>>9164865
>i mean did 17th century English scholars know about Aristotle or Plato?
this HAS to be bait...
Alright Autistic question time.
If you cut an object with something sharp like a knife, is a small amount of the material simply pushed down underneath the knife (literally under the very narrow blade edge) as is cuts, or is every single bit of the material pushed to the sides of the blade edge as it cuts?
1000 hours in paint for poor representation of what I'm trying to describe.
i think every single bit of the green strip is pushed to the sides
>>9164550
Like every single molecule?
How do you know?
>>9164554
ok i was thinking in this again
imagine a hypothetical situation with three particles (the situation on the pic)
notice that the vector is not necesseraly vertical or horizontal, to awser ur question, both things happen at once depending on many factors
/pol/ poster posted this proof making me quiestion life itself. Find an error in this proof if you can.
1. The fine-tuning of the fundamental physical constants of the universe is due either to physical necessity, chance, or design.
2. Proponents of the anthropic principle assume that because observations of the universe must be compatible with the conscious and sapient life that observes it, it is unremarkable that this universe has fundamental constants that happen to fall within the narrow range thought to be compatible with life -- which is a modal scope fallacy, i.e. it equivocates the necessity of the universe if conscious and sapient life that observes it exists, with modal necessity, i.e. it confuses "necessary if" and "necessary."
3. All physical things have a logical cause.
4. All logically-caused things are contingent, i.e. it is possible for them not to be caused.
5. Therefore, all physical things are contingent.
6. The fundamental physical constants are a physical thing.
7. Therefore, the fundamental physical constants are contingent.
8. Therefore, the fine-tuning of the universe is not due to physical necessity, and the universe, as it is, is not the only possible world.
9. There is an infinite number of possible worlds in which the fine-tuning of the universe and all its antecedents do not exist or are in an infinite number of different states.
10. Therefore, the probability of a possible world in which the fundamental constants exist and fall within the narrow range thought to be compatible with life is ℵ_0/ℵ_0^2 (tends to 0).
11. Therefore, the probability that the fine-tuning of the universe is due to chance is ℵ_0/ℵ_0^2.
12. n/n^2=1/n
13. Therefore, the probability that the fine-tuning of the universe is not due to chance is (ℵ_0 - 1)/ℵ_0 (tends to 1).
14. Therefore, it is due to design.
>>9164497
>1. The fine-tuning of the fundamental physical constants of the universe is due either to physical necessity, chance, or design.
Define fine tuning
After you've done that prove that our constants are the only ones that create a stable universe
>3. All physical things have a logical cause.
All things inside this universe must have a cause.
We don't know if that holds true for the very beginning or even before that
I really do believe in a higher being.
BUT, humans are the kind of lifeforms to even attempt to ask questions and try to find answers in the first place.
What if we just stopped doing it?
In step 10 he assumed that the infinity of universes that can sustain life is smaller than the one of all universes
It might sound obvious but how do u prove that?
>Be psychologist
>Spend most of your career doing analisis of movies
>>9164192
Say it with me: psychology always was and always will be a meme.
>>9164192
>be physicist
>spend most of your career as a CS monkey
>>9164219
>be CS monkey
>spend most of your career fixing the mistakes of previous CS monkeys
>91% of human DNA is considered trash by scientists
>somehow this is not evidence of ayy lmaos genetic engineering
>>9164184
>91% of human DNA is considered trash by scientists
Le ebin factoid!
>>9164184
if aliens so dam good, why they junk all dat DNA
shit make no sence
>>9164188
most of that DNA was turned off, not really trash.
>scientists and museums around the world fake bone datation whenever they found a human corpse that doesn't fit with their official model of 6k years old
>sniptsonian museum has a collection of humans that are 12 feet tall but they deny their existance
I though science was about truth and not darwinian dogma.
>>9164142
Source pls?
>>9164250
https://prophecyinthenews.com/articles/the-giants-of-ohio/
Is there any book that is more BASED?
Bowling Alone
which book is it?
I mean he just states a fact
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_nonsense
>>9164004
This would be an amazing idea if you got graded on effort.
What would be the best way to study for GRE?
You don't need to study for the GRE.
>>9163989
Some people may not need to, but I believe I do.
>>9163992
Then brush up on your geometry, trig, algebra, and reading comprehension, because the general test is basically SAT 2.0. There's no college level math or reading questions on there, but you might get tripped up if you haven't touched the lower level stuff in a while.
There seems to be a body of evidence out there that suggests that nicotine acts as a boost to memory and function -
Obviously, the downsides of taking nicotine through cigarettes and tobacco well outweighs that potential nootropic ingestion.
My question, then, is whether other systems of nicotine delivery - such as gum, or dermal patches - could be used? And if so, is it a worthwhile cost-benefit (nootropic boost vs lifetime addiction to the demon nicotine) to invest in?
Nicotine withdrawal can still send someone into panic attacks, depression and even fevers. Not worth it.
>>9163628
But that's withdrawal.
Say if you were just chewing gum throughout the day, and withdrawal wasn't an issue.
Gum works really well but don't go overboard and don't stress your jaws too much.
i came here to ask my question, suppose you were able to keep a brain alive in space and it was in something to protect it at light speed. and it traveled at the speed of light but had no senses what would happen?
>>9163614
There's no such thing as "having no senses".
>>9163617
i mean like no eyes nose mouth, just brain
>>9163620
nothing
the brain need input from the senses to act/react. in your scenario the brain wouldn't even know that it is in space or travelling with lightspeed.
What does it mean if someone displays repeated indifference and/or cruelty towards people, but constant affection towards animals such as cats and dogs?
It's a well known psychological phenomenon called "being an edgy teenager".
>>9163601
It might mean that they have taken a good look at people and dogs and come to the self-evident conclusion that people are cunts and dogs are not. Cats don't count. They are cunts too.
>>9163601
I think those are called weaklings