Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 304. page

>>9064169
>Jewish mark on the textbook

I appreciate the suggestion but I am not into that. Could you at least tell me which pages have liberal propaganda so that I can skip them?

>>9064173
Seriously /pol/, fuck off.
Finding this shit even in book suggestions?
Go to the sticky you retard and never post here again.

http://www.thenewatlantis.com/docLib/20160819_TNA50SexualityandGender.pdf

>>9064057
>Can we have a purely scientific discussion on treating homosexuality and transsexualism?
Probably not but I'll try.

>What hypotheses have shown the most promise?

Not 'social constructs'. It's better to view transsexualism as a behavior, where a member of one gender behaves and identifies as a member of another. There may be a cognitive root to this, but that should be viewed as beyond our current grasp. Social constructs, on the other, render gender impossible to study scientifically. If gender is whatever you want it to be, there's no point in defining it. It looses all semantic value.

>>9064069
>http://www.thenewatlantis.com/docLib/20160819_TNA50SexualityandGender.pdf
>Finding of Social Science and Psychology ...
>Doesnt belong in /sci/

>>9063926
Less work for the heart to pump blood to the brain.
Same reason shorties live longer.

Cite some sources.

Is this like when people say that those with high IQ are unattractive? Because the opposite turned out to be true when the data came in.

they're always trying to learn

>>9063830
Is there any evidence to suggest that dotted line exists?

>>9063836
The very existence of the laws of physics means that it certainly does.
>hurr durr anything is possible

Indeed but did you know 0=infinity?

>>9063817
Reminder that schizophrenia does not mean profundity.

Infinites were a mistake.

>Cantor's diagonal argument
>Gödel's incompleteness theorem
>Zeno's paradox
>Galileo's paradox
>Ross–Littlewood problem

The list goes on and on. The so called "solutions" to these problems (the ones that have solutions) are hideous abortions tacked onto real math and logic. Most of modern math is only usable in a tiny subset of the problems it can be applied to. Finite length statements/equations that need to be decidable in a finite amount of time, e.g. all formal systems, cannot be expected to properly deal with infinites.

Thanks for reading, I know most of you are too indoctrinated to agree.

>>9063777
>big band

>>9063777
bang*

I am trying to figure this out myself op. I wonder why the scientists ignore this.

>>9064230
This is a fucking masterpiece

File: I'd like to interject for a moment - cauchy.png (61KB, 1321x319px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 1321x319px

>>9063759

>>9063749
latex beamer slides

>>9063749

https://www.overleaf.com/

>>9063778
>>9063784
Checked both of those out, and while I thank you guys for your suggestions, I find that latex is very difficult to deal with.

Not difficult in the sense that it is hard to learn, but that it is hard to work with. I couldn't find how the padding works. It is much easier for me to write something in HTML/css and position elements how I want.

So, how do I just make the diagram and put it into slides.com or Google slides?

>>9063667
Are you female? (not trying to be mean)
Seems superficial IMO. As long as it is decipherable.

it's function > it's form

(form is a part of the function to an extent in the case of writing)

>>9063667
is calligraphy really /sci/ related? (I'm a newfag, maybe there's occasional handwriting/notetaking threads).
Actually, I could totally see a: "post your iq / education level / major and handwriting" thread.

>>9063667
waste of time.

>>9063540

Mersenne and Fermat

>>9063540
>Gauss or Tao?
Gauss
>Riemann or Serre?
Riemann
>Galois or Wiles?
Wiles
>Dedekind or Jacobson
Dedekind
>Cauchy or Ahlfors?
Cauchy
>Abel or Floer?
Abel
>Weierstrass or Nirenberg?
Weierstrass

>>9063540
>comparing mathematicians like pokemon
consider kys

>>9063499
Lack of sunlight and/or fertilizer

WEED

>>9063499
Sometimes I wonder if it is just once you are out of a stifling environment (Nonintellectual parents/peers and the pressure to appease them), childish addictions (TV (it used to be OK when Discovery, Natgeo, History channel weren't all Hippies, Conspiracies, and reality-History), vidya games, WEED, social media)

so basically >>9063501

>>9063358
The 4th dimension is speed. Proof me wrong.

>>9063422
No, the 4th dimension is meat dumbass

It is only in relativity, except only rural and suburban retards use that. City people use quantum mechanics.

popsci and scifi

>>9063255
Obviously because that's what all us scientists here have conditioned them to believe OP, so we can get everlasting funding.

What are that limitations?

>>9063254

how would the bearings repair themselves?

>>9063254
I suppose it isn't impossible. It'd likely work as a internally lubricated socket of cartilage with a dense boney sphere inside of that acting as the ball. I don't really think that this would ever arise out of nature however, most terrain is not designed for wheeled transit. Thus the creature would have to live somewhere like the American south west with it's flat terrain and smooth rocky surfaces for this to arise as a valuable mechanism.

File: 1500928571214m.jpg (84KB, 1024x583px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 1024x583px

>>9063254
Ball bearings? Try complex nano machinery.

>>9063222
Vegans are horrible people, but it's not an eating disorder.

>>9063247
How the fuck are vegans horrible people?

>>9063277
>t. vegan