Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 302. page

>>9067144
So what you are asking is, why didn't we evolve into species that can see the future ? Get ur ass back to /x/

>>9067147
No why does your body not do something like make you really sick, but only for a day, to give a heads up of "if you continue doing what you're doing what caused this, this is going to be permanently"

>>9067155
It does actually. The body gives us info about our health.

>>9067138
nyaaa

>>9067138
>>9067143
wrong neighbourhood /a/ fags

The intersection of unions is the same as the union of intersections

basically, it doesnt matter how you order your unions or intersections, as the operation is associative

kind of like how 1+1+1+1+1+1-1-1-1-1-1=1-1+1-1+1-1+1-1+1-1

Math
Physics
Chemistry
Biology
Computer science
Engineering
Philosophy
Linguistics
Economics
History
Politics

Choose

>>9066986
Farming
Self-sufficiency
Homesteading
Permaculture
Mycology
DIY-stuff (metallurgy, electronics, woodworking, etc)

>>9066986 (OP)
I'm very much into mathematics that fit under the umbrella of 'discrete mathematics' (think graph theory, combinatorics, logic, etc) and want to specialize in algorithms (potentially graph related algorithms). I'm also interested in linear algebra, algebra and their connections to category theory. Eventually I would like to better understand homotopy type theory (I think this is the direction my studies are leading me down long term).

On the side for "fun" I started getting into deep learning and programming. I'm starting to pursue it in parallel to my more pure math studies. I want to better understand deep learning. All I do is theorems-proofs. I never create anything "real" or produce anything tangible people can see. I want to shake that up a bit and start doing deep learning projects on the side for fun. Mostly just to "learn" how things work.

I also am starting to get into functional programming and software development. I want to learn how to do "data engineering" stuff to connect all the pipes to pipes for the data science/big data. Depending on how much I like ML I could see myself getting into both "data engineering" and a "machine learning" role.

My interest has always aligned with theory more than anything practical, so even if I approach a practical subject I always approach it from a theoretical pov to have solid foundations.

>>9066893
The connectivity is a measure of how many EDGES at minimum must be removed to render the graph disconnected.

The minimum degree of n-2 tells you that every connected component has connectivity n-2

All you have to do is prove that it is 1 component to begin with.

>>9066893
>been studying graph theory for a few weeks
>unable to prove that
>mfw brainlet
I should give up

>>9066909
I should have specified, the book uses the definition of "vertex connectivity" as in the minimum size of a vertex cut set.
But yeah I've seen there are two nonequivalent definitions floating around. That's weird.

Everything is from space, OP

>>9066596
Especially your mother.

>>9066521
Yes, think about how large a group your ancestors are, just a few generations ago.
>1 Gen: 2
>2 Gen: 4
>3 Gen: 8
>4 Gen: 16
>5 Gen: 32

Yea, though, there is a lot of autism on pedigree families.

If you have an extra chromosome, yes.

I'm under the impression that listening to anything is worse than silence. Essentially anything you use any mental energy on is a distraction. If you want to stick to that theory headphones and white noise, eventually you will forget it's there.
You could also use one of those online rain/storm sound generators. It accomplishes the same thing and is much more pleasant.
That said, I tend to listen to ambient video game music. Specifically the No Man Sky soundtrack. I'd recommend anything you like without singing though. Or just music you've heard a thousand times already and can mentally tune out. The key is for you to not listen, as odd as that sounds, so if it gets you into the mood to study, and is easy to tune out, it's good.

>>9066374
thanks brother

Technical death metal for studying or gtfo

you completed a BA and don't know how to google?

>>9066241
Great blogpost, as expected from a History BA such as yourself.

SMD

Yeah, man. People born blind should stay ignorant.

>>9066178
The reason I quoted "visualize" is because I was referring to mathematical/physical (pertaining to physics) visualization. A blind person can visualize basic math, I'm sure.

>>9066179
blind people actually suck at math, look it up

The real answer's 3.6, right?

>>9066114
there is no "real" answer, it's deliberately ambiguous just for trolling purposes

>>9066119
I think the closest thing to a real answer is whatever follows the conventional rules. It's 58 btw.

>>9066043
This question makes no sense. If the technology works then it's proof enough.

>>9066043
the fact they exist and have actively been visiting earth inherently implies their technology works, meaning our understanding of reality simply needs to be adjusted.

>>9066047
>>9066046
cucks

If you take an alien's word as gospel you're a fool. They're literally just lying to us to come off as superior with technology their ancestors created while they fucked off in spaceships for centuries.

>>9065936
no information medical school students have access to is really that secret, especially to diagnose something. I'll play along though, describe?

>>9065948
I'm looking for some links or where to look for.

>>9065936

textbooks from library genesis
google
Wikipedia

Even if you could get it to work, it wouldn't really be useful because the amount of energy generated would be pathetic.

Lets assume the photosynthesis has an ideal efficiency of 10% of solar energy that hits it (realistically it would be more like 1%). On average the sun gives about 120 watts per square meter per hour during daylight. Average surface area of an adult human is 1.9 meters square over 24 hours. Lets be generous and say that you're naked and your entire body is in sunlight, somehow. That's 1.9*120 for the watts over 24 hours (228 watts), so with our 10 percent efficiency we get 22.8 watts of energy in a whole day.

That's less than 6 calories. You can get that much energy at once by eating a single stick of celery. Or just eat a Snickers bar and get 10 times as much energy

>>9065927
>per hour

that should have been "Per 24 hours" not per hour

>>9065927
like this anon said, the energy would be tiny. there's a reason plants dont have locomotion, it requires an enormous amount of ATP.

pretty brainlet desu

>>9065808
smarter than i actually am
whoever made that pic was probably an idiot undergraduate

>>9065732
1+2+3+... != -1/12 no matter how many times you watch the numberphile video

>>9065739
That's not even my question

>>9065743
Your mistake was at Σn = -1/12 and the guy who replied to you was on point.