Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 299. page

>>9069266
Nyquist*

>>9069266
>eli5 the Myquist frequency
what does that even mean

>>9069277
Eli5 = explain like I'm five

File: 1482053111735.jpg (237KB, 1179x1461px) Image search: [Google]

237KB, 1179x1461px

Mathematicians don't need to give a damn about science unless they want. It's science that needs math, not the other way around.

>>9069138
This.

>>9069135
The fuck are you talking about? Engineers are one of the most employed outside their fields.

>>9069026
[math]\mathbb{BIG}[/math]

>>9069026
*transposes behind u*

>>9069101
"Pshhh, nothin' Pythagorean kiddo~"

>>9068816
>inb4 *two* - it's a typo.

>>9068816
>What is a field
>What is closure

>>9068816
If it's a summer course it's possible that person is a lecturer and not a prof, basically he's a glorified cs undergrad, that's the problem. Also the sum of a finite number of rationals being a rational is not an axiom, it called fucking addition. The reason why people are eating it up is because they don't care nor do they understand the material. Not all comp sci math courses are like this though, mostly since they can't afford to fuck up basic discrete math since they'd be doubly fucked when trying to program that shit.

>>9068466
I thought it was the energy from the big bang? Curious as well now. Not a science guy but stumbled on the board.

>>9068466
it's paying energy... the universe is cooling

>>9068549
The universe's cooling is a result of expansion not the cause.

Who?

>>9068201
that one guy what's his face

>>9068201
I'm assuming you are a troll, but to answer your question I'm assuming you want someone who did something important that you won't be able to brush off as just important mathematically.

The easiest to understand, in terms of their immediate impact, that I believe you will have difficulty arguing with, would be Alan Turing. Aside from the cryptographic work he did during the war, he laid the foundation for much of theoretical Computer Science, which was of critical importance in developing the technology with which you shit up this board.

What does "going up in time" even mean?
We should first decide on what "up" is.

>>9068001
If you can go forward or backwards you just need to go perpendicular to that

you would be in the present moment

:3

File: 1500889392279.jpg (231KB, 1292x848px) Image search: [Google]

231KB, 1292x848px

>>9067819
We are born pure.

Bump for interest. And also how to increase my executive function enough to escape the horsepussy

A little bit of both. Humans can learn to associate literally anything with sex and get turned on thanks to conditioning.

thanks man, now i will go study geology 1 year into CS

>>9067805
>not realizing all STEM fields are like this
In engineering you learn all this crazy theory only to get a job using excel.

>>9067805
Ok anon, you're jaded, that sucks. Is there anything at all that your knowledge can be applied to?

>>9067804
So how do you respond to those? Other than calling for the abolition of philosophy? Are you intimidated?

>>9067809
Why not be practical and ask what has philosophy achieved the last 20 years?

File: csvoss-500-600.png (324KB, 500x600px) Image search: [Google]

324KB, 500x600px

>>9067580
Newton

Fuck those two cuck's unrigorous calculus approach. Bolzano and Weierstraß.

Newton. Autism senpai represent.

File: 1494207991121.jpg (153KB, 769x790px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 769x790px

But Mitalipov and his colleagues are said to have convincingly shown that it is possible to avoid both mosaicism and “off-target” effects, as the CRISPR errors are known.

But Mitalipov and his colleagues are said to have convincingly shown that it is possible to avoid both mosaicism and “off-target” effects, as the CRISPR errors are known.

But Mitalipov and his colleagues are said to have convincingly shown that it is possible to avoid both mosaicism and “off-target” effects, as the CRISPR errors are known.

But Mitalipov and his colleagues are said to have convincingly shown that it is possible to avoid both mosaicism and “off-target” effects, as the CRISPR errors are known.
But Mitalipov and his colleagues are said to have convincingly shown that it is possible to avoid both mosaicism and “off-target” effects, as the CRISPR errors are known.

Nothing relevant happened, weeb.

>>9067564
>Nothing relevant happened, weeb.

The study is going to be published and will show genetic engineering of embryos is successful and safe. That's not a big step forward? We could see a baby born from this technique in the next few years.

>>9067305
>Will "nofap" help me produce more testosterone
no
but it might give you prostate cancer

your body is trying to tell you to transition

>>9067307
>>9067313
I guess this is what "science" looks like nowadays huh?

>>9066834
Yeah, why not. If you want to be code monkey you don't need to be smart.

>>9066837
A code monkey with 200k/month?

>>9066843
I was kidding. But why not 125 is pretty good. Only 5% of population have IQ 125 and higher. You should be glad. But don't count on online IQ tests. It's total bullshit.

>>9064936
Free will is obviously not real

>>9064936
Define "free will", OP.

File: thinking-face.png (53KB, 256x256px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 256x256px

>>9064936

If humans can run, why can't they run when we break the bones of their legs?