Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 2154. page

yes and no

it doesn't look stable, it would fall easily

File: Pelican.png (1MB, 1536x1152px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1536x1152px

>>7661717
what about this

You've got cum eye

stop aiming your dick at your left eye

>>7661464

You need to take the spoon out of your cup of coffee before you drink it.

>>7661351
Judging by your post, you are 13 years old, high, and suffering some sort of learning disability. Am I right?

If I'm wrong about the learning disability, then I guess that justifies the study.

Or, here's a hint, try reading the study in question. Want to know how they measured IQ? Read the study. Why do they think there were changed in brain structures other than the hippocampus? Read the study. What about your neurogenesis concerns? Read the fucking study.

Theres a lot of these stupid pot justification threads now.
Yes it is ultimately bad for you.
If you want to smoke weed then fucking smoke it jackass.

>>7661351
>the hippocampus is the only region in the brain that undergoes neurogenesis
> only

[citation needed] faggot

I think you have multiple personality disorder that really clashes with your other self. Why don't you two get a room.

>>7661253
yeah you tell em brother
I went outside this morning and it was colder than it has been in weeks. Global warming my ass.

>>7661253
do you seriously buy all the 'climate change is a big conspiracy' crap?

tide goes in, tide goes out
you can't explain that
God : 1
Atheists : burning in hell

>>7661227
Isn't that a biology question

>>7661227
wat

>>7661223
lol have you tried googling any of this?

>>7661223
I would've helped you, but I took offence at your picture's filename.

File: IMG_3327.jpg (21KB, 200x213px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 200x213px

>>7661242
have i !?!?
I tried real hard !!!!

>>7660671
The connection to physics is mostly through statistical mechanics (and quantum to a lesser extent) which is used to develop models and methods in chemical solutions thermodynamics that is applied to biochemical systems including surface science and macroscopic systems (molecular thermodynamics models applied to chem. sol. thermo. methods). Textbooks:

>Garland, Dill K A , Bromberg S Molecular Driving Forces; Statistical Thermodynamics In Chemistry And Biology

Written by physicists, CS and a chemical engineer. This is one of my favourite textbooks. A similar text

>Daan Frenkel, Berend Smit Understanding Molecular Simulation, Second Edition_ From Algorithms to Applications (Computational Science Series 1)

written by "biophysicists" I would never recommend this disconjointed clusterfuck, but I understand it has some reputation in the field.

>>7660691
*Switched my titles around accidentally.

>>7660671
bump for santa

>>7660665
I wish Cirno was posted more often in math-related threads.

Should be very easy, it's just applied math.

>>7660665
Completely different ways of thinking. Some mathematicians can't do physics even if their life depend on it, some can do it and they are good at it. It's up to you.

>>7660665
People get physics degrees without a math masters? That's like the bare minimum entry requirement.

Are AI researchers really trying to emulate a brain in software. Maybe they might be trying to understand some heuristics used by humans so they can use them in programming a theorem prover or something but is anyone actually trying to build a copy of a brain using electronics?

>>7660063
Fuck your shit OP.

I want to know if that troll science comic would work at a small amount.

The brain is no more a quantum device than computer circuitry. Both exist in a world subject to quantum laws. And neither exploit those laws in any particular way, but rather seem to do their best to cancel out all quantum jitter from their mechanisms.

The brain is several magnitudes more complicated than the wildest fever dreams of a CPU architecture designer, but the difference is not some hand-wavy thing like "quantum mechanics." Instead it is raw fucking complexity.

Graph theory basicly. These problems are often linked to computer sience though, with algorithms like depth-first search and width-first search

>>7659927
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knot_Theory

>>7659927
graph theory. Look at planarity of a graphs and elementary counterexamples (K5, graphs having K5 as a subgraph)

FUCK NO. I have to do a final project for this intro to engineering course and this stupid kid followed me into the final project choice I wanted to do simply because he knows I'll do all the work. He's going for Civil and I'll doubt he'll even manage getting through school for that.

>>7659840

Why don't you tell him to get his ass in gear?

>lab partner
>in math

>>7659565
>https://finance.yahoo.com/news/leading-harvard-physicist-radical-theory-160000092.html

Not http://physics.aps.org/articles/v7/41

Stay plebtier pleb

> not aliens
shit theory

>>7659586
>AYYY LMAO
Pleb.
>>7659580
Said the Pleb.

>>7659517
I hope your wife/best friend is an engineer then so your life won't be wasted on chalk scribbling for muh ego

Not having a suitable application at the moment doesn't mean there isn't one.

History is full of cases where the true value of a given theorem wasn't realized until much later.

>>7659535
But still, your value of the math hinges on it being applicable in the future.

Suppose you could know that a certain field of mathematics could never be applicable. Would you value it?

>>7658678

BTTF2 was fiction.

>>7658678
All of the ground would need to be magnets.

File: 1447996351948.jpg (64KB, 700x580px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 700x580px

>>7658680
>aeroplanes were fiction
>jet engines were fiction
>rockets were fiction
>computers were fiction
>space travel was fiction

File: file-page2.jpg (937KB, 2550x3300px) Image search: [Google]

937KB, 2550x3300px

page 2/2

>>7658381
most promising thread i've seen in ages

1) It's useless to pick an a_i to be 4 or more - you can split it into 2 + (a_i - 2) if that's the case and get a better one product. So we're left with choosing from 2 and 3. Two 3's are better than 3 2's (9 > 8) so we have to pick as many 3s as possible. That takes us to 999. Then we have to compare 3 vs 2+2, where the 2's win.

Final answer:
n = 334
Sequence = 2 times 2, 332 times 3,

>>7658381
2) Let's assume a solution exists, x needs to be close to the square root of 379. This is about 19. Try 19 (it's easy to multiply these numbers because it includes 20), doesn't work, too big. Try 18. It works, looks like this:

380 * 378 + 1 = 379^2