Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 2148. page

>>7666175
They do, your premise is incorrect.

Next question!

>>7666179
Show me how light is solid
>protip: You can't

>>7666179

Really??
They do??
but i heard that if you cool helium to 0 Kelvin
its liquid!
and could metals vaporize?
could you have iron gas?

File: c50ac960435f6834b5e6df67d9a27acc.png (527KB, 1311x945px) Image search: [Google]

527KB, 1311x945px

You're fucked, just give me her number
Should have majored in neuro m8

>>7666049
Read the sticky.

>>7666049
Since there are threads which are more retarded, and since neuro is my area of specialization, two good texts are "Neuroscience" 5th edition by Purves (and others) and "Principles of Neural Science" by Kandel (and others).

How big is the diamond? What kind of diamond? How fast is it going? We need more details here.

>>7666038
The Hope Diamond, as fast as we can launch something of that size.

>>7666042
45.52 carats (9.104 g)
Type IIb diamond

>>7666018
women

>>7666018
Wifi devices don't put out that much power. There's a bunch of other stuff that would (probably) be worse for you if wifi was harmful, like fluorescent lighting even.

>>7666108
Wifi penetrates through cement and therefore through the skull altering brainwaves. Having no idea how brainwaves operate.

>>7666001
In 6 years
>Max computational power reached
>Tight oil supplies cause medicine, plastics, and other petrochemical shortages
>Economy in ruins from the bust of the VLSI bubble, subsequent lack of innovation, material shortages, and taxes from economical wars.
>Historic global depression and unemployment which leads to widespread banking and business failures
>Terrorism explodes
>Extreme weather and land erosion dislocates countless number of people
>Loss of all privacy with increases in population monitoring, spying, and tracking
>Internet traffic becomes monitored, censored, and activism is stifled

In 12 years
>Unprecedented crop failures
>Large scale food, water, ore, and oil shortages
>War everywhere
>Lack of clean water, medicine, and sterile plastics goods cause global pandemics
>Ethnic strife and massive increase in genocides

In 26 years
>Nuclear and Biological weapon proliferation
>Large rise in random acts of killings
>Behavioral sink kicks in
>Effort to force peace by the formation of a Global Government by surviving NATO powers begins, those opposed are mercilessly dealt with.
>Increased Atheism and Nihilism
>WWIII begins

In 44 years
>WWIII ends
>Extinction of the human race

In 45 years
>Jesus returns

If the last 10 years are anything to go by, the next 10 years are going to be a whole lotta nothing. Everything was going so fast and then all of a sudden it all stopped somewhere in the mid 2000s. A good bit of infrastructure and some sound engineering here and there, but computers are barely growing (and somehow Computer Science seems to be stuck in 2002, but that's what happens when you monetize something to such an absurd degree) and scientific advancements have been sparse. But that's usually how it goes. Science happens in leaps and bounds. With most of the time spent looking back at what we just passed over or looking at the next insurmountable gap we have to pass.

Also it's funny how everyone gets the impression that Quantum Mechanics is some new field with lots of pending advancements when it's older than General Relativity. Simple Quantum computing proof-of-concept archetypes MIGHT be coming, but I wouldn't hold your breath.

>>7666001
The surest prediction of the future is that no one can predict the future.

I've read the novela 1936, which was written in 1886, positing the future of 50 years hence. Heavier than air flight proved impossible, and so everyone traveled about on high-speed trains. Poverty, disease, and racism had all been eliminated...

Well, they did not get much right, but it was an entertaining utopia.

>>7665926
You're dividing it. Separating one whole into multiple constituent parts.

What does that REALLY mean? We don't know. We just don't know. We only understand it on certain scales.

>>7665926
You're multiplying by its inverse

You're repeatedly subtracting
200/10 =20 because you can subtract 10, 20 times from 200.
It's not that difficult really

>>7665912
Got tired of making EmDrive threads?

>>7665912
NASA has been real silent about it.

File: 1447817885591.jpg (28KB, 354x313px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 354x313px

These threads without the source link to the original photo always trigger my autism.

Post sauce or go sudoku, you faget.

>>7665872
What is the question?

Clearly, OP, you are the one here to shitpost. The question isn't even stated in the picture, or your comment. You probably don't even know what the question is.

>>7665872
8=7+1
16=7+9
32=7+25
64=7*9+1
128=7*1+121
256=7*25+81
512=7*49+169
1024=7*9+31^2
...

>>7665866
We don't, it's supernatural.

Check you religious texts of choice for explanation

>>7665866
>Deja vu
Come back when you're asking about Deja vu of Deja vu, I get that every so often and that's a mindfuck.

>Deja vu^3 just straight up leaves you thinking you're in a time loop

>>7665866
Yes.

Something something about dreams and the brain keeping leftover metadata around that gets attached to new memories.

Le bump

You can work i a Bank. The Black-Sholes equation made it Physicist.

You can work at McDonald's.

why is he so memed? Whats wrong with the guy?

>>7665663
He's black

>>7665658
I'm not sure he even does research.

>>7665652

No mathematical basis. It's just pothead waving their hands using big words.

Reality

>>7665652
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yqLlgIaz1L0

What drug is this?

>>7665485
Why do you need to know what drug this is?

>>7665482
Wolff Kishner does not reduce alcohols, I never actually used that in practice but I believe it uses an alcohol as a solvent.

Don't know how much it costs either. You can always go the gay route and dehydrate and hydrogenate

>>7665357
No

>>7665357
to create art.

I don't know about appreciate, but it does require heightened intelligence for someone to have a meaningful discussion about why they appreciate a piece of art.

My initial value is y(L)=0, so do I just move backwards in steps of L (i.e. 1L, 0.75L, 0.50L, 0.25L, 0L) and make my Euler table that way?

>>7665323
I don't know Euler's method so I won't try to teach it, but this is how I would solve your equation (I rename your ratio R):

[math] y'= \frac{ y-R \sqrt{ x^2+y^2 }}{x} [/math]
[math] y'= \frac{y}{x} - R \sqrt{ 1+ \left( \frac{y}{x} \right)^2 } [/math]

sub in u=y/x,

[math] x u' + u = u - R \sqrt{ 1+ u^2 } [/math]
[math] x u' = - R \sqrt{ 1+ u^2 } [/math]

which is separable.

>>7665396
So I would just divide each side by the square root term and by x, and then integrate each side? Then, I could solve for R by re-substituting y/x for u?