Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 2110. page

File: come_on_now.jpg (26KB, 600x375px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 600x375px

Holy shit this board is so garbage

>>7698667
>Girls do better than boys in math + science
That is definitely not true. I will give them that girls and boys can be as good as each other when it comes to math and science. Seriously, this femenist proapaganda of "womyn be gud and buys b dumm" hurts my head.

>stereotypes keep them away from STEM
Says who? Where's the data. Has a woman ever said:
Oh, I really wanted to get a 300k starting job in mathematics but the stereotypes just pushed me away to psychology to get this shitty 30k job.

Because that's bullshit. Nobody would shy away from making bank because stereotypes that don't even exist anyways. Women get in STEM and do just fine. None of them get raped by the creepy engineers like feminists claim.

>>7698667
Arguable, the success you experience in school and the success you gain in professional work is not likely as correlated as you would like. The 1%'ers that make it as successful and productive STEM'ers, especially in the hard sciences, are different in a way grades only partially show. They certainly got good grades, but there is a huge difference between learning and creating.

File: 1408560953008.gif (716KB, 608x342px) Image search: [Google]

716KB, 608x342px

No he didn't.

>>7698642
>has just

he published that tripe fucking years ago

>>7698647
and the leading physicists are still struggling to udnerstand it. That's how much more intelligent he is than us.

>>7698572
We wouldn't because digging into the ground is more of a pain in the ass than just sticking floors on top of one another.

>>7698572
THE EARThis Hollow, THE nAZIS LIFE THEIRE

there's underground water so you would need additional protection
you don't get sunlight, it's probably bad for your health and you need more electricity
also this >>7698578

(Cont.)

I haven't worked this one in such detail, but observing that

[math] \displaystyle \| L (u, v) \| ^ 2 = \sum_{n \ge 25} u ^ 2_ {2n} v ^ 2_ {2n +1} / n ^ 2 \le C\|(u_n/\sqrt n)\|_4^2 \|(v_n/\sqrt n)\|_4^2 \le C\|(u_n/\sqrt n)\|_2^2 \|(v_n/\sqrt n)\|_2^2 = C \left (\sum u ^ 2_ {n} / n \right) \left (\sum v ^ 2_ {n} / n \right) [/math]

one can easily find at leat one closed-form solution applying the bubble integral. In the equation, [math] \displaystyle L [/math] is a bilinear operator.

6. Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture

The problem with former attempts has been in the way elliptic curves have been dealt with. But this really admits a proof with a computer by checking the (finitely many) categories of curves.

I also have a simpler than Perelman's proof of the Poincare conjecture, but it's not worth the prize anymore.

Corrected typo in 3:

the correct number should be [math] \displaystyle 10^{13} [/math]

Of course, if you have any questions, I'll answer them with pleasure.

can u do triple integrals?

>>7698509
>wanting to become a wagekek
Why?

>>7698515
Dude wageslavery is just fine for the majority of the world you know...

You work, at some boring 2-bit job, get some money, come home, grab something to eat and some beer, chill out and watch TV, shower and go to bed, repeat the next day, until you die.

That's the life, r-right?

>>7698509
if you really studied something, you should be able to create value even from your basement.

Elements heavier than iron don't have exothermic fusion reactions. That and the universe is fundamentally on a one way street thanks to the second law of thermodynamics.

So a long long long time from now the universe will be dead in some sense.

>>7698447
Who knows... Who knows..

>>7698450
Man, I hope the ergodic hypothesis is false too.

>>7698139
Why don't you take the scientific approach and stop ejaculating and let us know how it goes in 30 years.

>>7698139
Ejaculation decreases testosterone (and dopamine), while increasing prolactin. Lack of orgasm increases testosterone levels for ~1 week. I don't know if it truly drops back to baseline after that, but that's what's frequently said. No literature I've read has gone into that aspect.

>>7698144
...

yes now find it

What he said. Its in there somewhere, you can get it and be reknowned the world over if y'just go digging.

I hope you're trolling, but honestly, I'm not even sure anymore

>>7697932
they're not powerful enough to do more than oscillate water molecules. microwave ovens are perfectly safe. it's only 250ish htz not enough to do damage to stuff

It creates radioactive isotopes like polonium 210 and cesium 137 in your food

>>7697935
They do more than oscilate water. Microwaves heat according to the heat capacity. Its why glass heats up to 100°C before the water in the glass fully boils.

It doesn't matter what they say because they're fucking disqualified for revealing information to each other.

I can figure out that Jill and Bob are a bunch of filthy cheaters.

Bob tells Jill that it's not a rectangle.
Jill tells Bob that it's the orange triangle.

>>7697793
Oh wait, I didn't see the purple circle. Whatever.

>>7697650
>microwaves are apparently dangerous

They aren't.

>>7697650
Elevation of heat shock proteins (by non-thermal means).
Certain cells are vulnerable to its magnetic field, and more so during specific parts of their cycle.
Exposure results in increased ROS production.
Changes in gene expression, naturally, are also observed.

Not going to go into the research about pyramidal cell dysfunction, or dysfunction of cells in the dentate gyrus / hippocampus. Don't care to go into increased blood brain barrier permeability either. Some studies show statistically significant changes in monoamine neurotransmitter secretion, mostly in 5-HT. The literature on this is both easily available, and highly conflicting. This is one of those areas where something became a thing, everyone is real attached to their wifi and cell phones, there are a lot of morons claiming to be hypersensitive, and the whole thing is a mess. It's difficult to sort through and figure what is really being observed, and what the underlying mechanics are.

It's worth noting, people think big pharma has power to flood journals with skewed research. But they've barely got anything on the resources of the communications industries. I'd be wary of any and all research.

Microwaves are dangerous because they vibrate your water molecules super fast. Wi-fi is cooking you from the inside out.

>>7697599
Cs is great, why do you hate it?

>>7697610
i dont enjoy it at all and most of the time it feels like a chore unless im making dumb shit just for me. i understand what's going on (right now at least), but i dont naturally think in a computer science-y manner, so im scared that the farther we progress the more ill fall off.

bump in hope of a math major/student seeing this

>>7697574

Find love.

>>7697574
It's nowhere near as profound as that poster implies. The grand meaning and absolute (very narrow) spectrum of outcomes is also largely incorrect.

Long term high stress levels do cause atrophy and volume loss in various regions, but the real issue lies in functional changes of those structures. Many of which are reversible to some extent. That which is seen cannot be unseen, and we remain capable of becoming any former version of ourselves. In many cases this causes psychological conflicts that must be reconciled to truly change, even after getting rid of the stresses or whatever it might be.

I'm relatively certain I myself have some degree of brain damage. I've been under high amounts of stress for most of my life. I've been alone most of my life. I've had health problems most of my life. I've had chronic pain ~1/2 my life. All of these produce changes in the brain. I can't really summarize what I've noticed, but I do know the psychological basis much of it stems from.

It is not strictly physical. Work on your problems and stopped drowning in self pity about being a miserable virgin or whatever your issue is.

>>7697598
can you say that the brain damage you think you've experienced has significantly interfered with your life?

>>7697553
If you could not understand engineering what makes you think you can understand pure mathematics.

She just wants your dick, not for you to understand her work. Give her a good pounding and move on.

>>7697569
We're talking about PvsNP right now. I'm asking her to explain things to me.

I dropped out of engineering because that's not what I wanna do anon. It wasn't for me, doesn't mean I'm stupid. But I doubt I'll be able to understand abstract algebra over a tinder convo.

wtf does PvNP have to do with noncommutative rings? What's a ring?!

>>7697553
wtf just meet her and stop being that autistic are you trying to impress her with your understanding?

>>7697533
That question is like which color most contributed to Van Gogh's paintings. Fucking meaningless question.

File: GOAT_goats.jpg (354KB, 1200x800px) Image search: [Google]

354KB, 1200x800px

>>7697533

Goats (genus Capra)

Penne.