>"you're majoring in math, right?"
>"oh, so you want to be a teacher?"
>>7770151
I'm learning to accept the possibility of being a teacher
>>7770161
May beelzebub have mercy on your soul
>>7770151
There's nothing else you can do with a math degree.
BASED engineers, bitches
architects be the ones groping for D
>>7769309
Architecture is the "I want to be creative but also make money / be respected for my job title" degree
>>7769309
Is architecture really a good job field?
I'm a medical student, but I'm not planning it.
The reason I wanted to say this is because my younger brother took architecture, but he failed three semesters in a row, and now he's on the IT field.
Question again, is it actually good? and you don't need math when you graduate it?
>>7769309
Engineers...
Mathematicians who can't do modern math.
What is the scientific reason why lesbianism turns guys on?
Because 4 tits and 2 asses is twice as good as the alternative.
>>7769151
they turn adolescents on.
If you're 20+ and you're still turned on by lesbians, you have some serious issues.
>>7769155
Also no dicks to have to avoid accidentally cumming to
Got any interesting space related pics?
>>7768246
Oh shit.
This is my moment.
>>7768441
Hey faggots! You use to denigrate people who decide to graduate in CS instead of Math.
> "CS is a meme degree"
> "kek too easy"
But, you know what? The founder and CEO of Facebook, a billionaire company, is Mark Zuckerberg. Who was exactly studying Computer Science at Harvard.
He's a fucking kike tho...
A $300 million lottery winner was studying pottery.
>>7768230
Kek, you dont need a CS degree to build a website
Is Rudin to /sci/ what SS is to /fit/?
>>7768228
>SS
Straight shota?
>>7768240
SS (starting strength), basically training scheme for them skinny fags
Here's my SS progress.
Can someone on /sci/ help explain this discrepancy?
Jet fuel can't melt steel beams.
>>7768187
only one of those buildings had a plane crash into it
>>7768195
Explain tower 7. No planes.
Any physics major here? What's your experience studying physics?
>>7767598
Good. It's also nice that we have a good relationship with the engineering department here at my uni.
After every stressful test I go to their faculty to catch some tight boipussy.
I'm really interested in
1) What's the most difficult class you had to take?
2) What was your final year project?
3) What did you do after getting your degree?
4) Any regrets?
>>7767601
Are you currently studying or have you graduated?
ITT: RF resonant cavity thrusters (aka EmDrive)
>>7766777
ITT: pseudoscience
>>7766797
It's a pretty solid looking theory, and tests so far have been successful. Granted, everything is pseudoscience until proven, but it's been recreated by different people of all different backgrounds around the world.
>>7766806
>It's a pretty solid looking theory,
No it absolutely is not solid looking. Whatever is going on with that thing, it's definitely not what that image says.
Is getting a biology degree just entirely memorization?
I mean they might have to know how to do log/exponent questions for answering questions about population, but I mean couldn't someone with an photographic memory just read a biology textbook to ace a biology exam?
Whos more of a scientists? An engineer or a biologist?
Is getting a mathematics degree just entirely memorization?
I mean they might have to know how to do log/exponent questions for answering questions about population, but I mean couldn't someone with an photographic memory just read a mathematics textbook to ace a mathematics exam?
Whos more of a scientists? An engineer or a mathematician?
Math involves having to use logic. You can't just memorize a math textbook and expect to ace a math test. You have to be able to apply it.
Were as biology is literally just all facts and data.
Also mathematicians are above scientists which means they are by default above engineers.
biology involves having to use logic. You can't just memorize a biology textbook and expect to ace a biology test. You have to be able to apply it.
Were as math is literally just all facts and data.
Also biology are above scientists which means they are by default above engineers.
>Failed math in school
>Could not speak until he was four
>Could not read until he was nine
>Was dyslexic
>teachers and parents thought he was mentally handicapped
>expelled from school
>refused admittance to the Zurich Polytechnic School
>had Asperger’s Syndrome
>failed his first attempt at entrance into college
>Might have been schizophrenic
>Had dyscalculia
>Had trouble memorizing words, texts, and names
>introverted, might have had social anxiety
How did he manage to do anything with all these defects?
>>7765796
>negative look at aspects of one mans life
He chose not to speak until he was 4. He deemed it unnecessary.
>all these defects
he was a rebel
not a sponge
>>7765797
I chose to not do shit for 18 years, i deemed it to be unnecessary. Am i smart senpai?
I graduated high school with subpar grades 6 years ago. I like to think I'm pretty smart if I apply myself. I'm thinking about going back to school for electrical engineering. Would most of it be over my head going in after a 6 year education gap?
>>7765755
>electrical engineering
why engineering?
>>7765755
Depends on how much you remember. How many questions can you answer?
>>7765755
>Would most of it be over my head going in after a 6 year education gap?
if you're actually smart then you should be able to get your head around everything necessary to start uni within a year. get the books and study like a madcunt.
So what's going to happen here?
In 2001 the UN estimated carrying capacity at 4-16bn with a median of 10. This has more recently been revised down, but let's stick with 10bn for now. At the current rate of growth, we'll hit 10bn in about 35 years.
Do you think there will be drastic improvements in technology that will allow us to sustain this number? If not, should we be aiming for zero growth and how would you go about this?
da phuc u talkin bout fgt
Out of curiosity, what did these studies generally consider to be the limiting resource?
>>7765545
braincells
Why does sci hate computer science? The hate is extreme.
>>7764187
Because /sci/ is filled with spergs. They hate SC, biology, medicine, and everything that isnt "pure".
>>7764187
they need it to feel superior and to troll people like you
Several reasons.
The field itself is generalized and not used for anything special, you'll never really be making any large contributions to human knowledge or advancement unless it's just a stepping stone. Being a cog in a machine or a hard worker is fine and good, but also kind of mediocre.
It's also oversaturated by idiots. There's countless assholes who go into it wanting to 'make video games' or 'become a hacker xD'. The most annoying part of a group is also the most vocal, so they're the ones that most of us see and run into - and it's not like there's any shortage of them. Go check out one of the "what's the people in your field like" threads next time one's up. CS is a goddamn nightmare when it comes to the people in it.
Lastly, it's the popsci choice for 'smart person job!!!!' right next to physics. (Which in my opinion is also sort of a useless degree). Stupid people try to cram how cool and awesome it is down people's throats and it leaves a bad taste in the mouth.
How could you possibly argue against majoring in Mechanical Engineering? It is the best major.
>>7763157
Well for one, I am not interested in the subject of Mechanical Engineering.
>>7763157
There are, in fact, other jobs to be done in society that Mechanical Engineering training does not qualify one for.
>>7763157
mechanical engineering<mechatronic engineering