given that pi is transcendental
and e is transcendental
can we rigorously prove that their sum and product are transcendental? better yet, can we prove that they HAVE to be transcendental if pi and e are?
>>7789443
>>7789443
maybe you could use Euler's formula in some way to disprove it?
This is still an unsolved problem. However it IS known that π + eπ, πeπ and eπ√n are all transcendental.
Looking at the moon in Celestia and I found this little wobble in its orbit. The red arc is the moon's path and the lower blue arc is the Earth's path. Probably hard to tell from the image, but the wobble is directly beneath (I guess "beneath" doesn't have much meaning in space) the Earth's path.
Anyway, is this just a bug in the software or does the moon's orbit actually dip in like that?
Here is a zoomed-out view from "above" showing where the dip is in relation to the Earth.
>>7789432
probably a glitch with the orbits, i saw it happens a few times aswell
>>7789423
This is gravity from another universe.
I didn't understand the secretary problem. So The best canditate is always who the fuck gets luck to be interviewed while I'm 37% throught my way or it says that I have only 37% of chance to find the best candidate of a set if I can't call them back after saying a no?
>>7789385
It is bullshit based on more bullshit. Don't waste your time on it.
>>7789385
http://demonstrations.wolfram.com/TheSecretaryProblem/
>>7789390
So any better alternative?
What's a good diet to do that will help me improve my brain /sci/?
>>7789358
Shameless self bump.
Nothing but jenkem
>>7789358
Healthy foods. Don't over eat. Exercise. Literally it.
Which way does the universe stack
Are pulsars like unique and do the all choose to spin the same way?
>Twirl pool
>are we still in the first universe
>no
But I think thes a provable connection too
>>7789417
Pulsars are part of alien communications systems. How they are set is determined by their location.
http://youtu.be/RBumgq5yVrA
>making equations
Last Thread
>>7777475
Post whatever you are working on, share the best books for beginners and people that is interested in learning or taking engineering.
>What are you studying/did you study?
>What projects are you working on?
>Did you go to college or are you autodidact?
>Which books are the best for your area?
Wiki:
http://4chan-science.wikia.com/wiki/Mechanical_and_Aerospace_Engineering
http://4chan-science.wikia.com/wiki/Electrical_and_Electronics_Engineering
http://4chan-science.wikia.com/wiki/Computer_Science_and_Engineering
http://4chan-science.wikia.com/wiki/Chemical_Engineering
>>7789349
>What are you studying/did you study?
Did BS in ME, doing MS in AE
>What projects?
Stress analysis on a big plane
>Which books?
I'm taking a course on damage tolerance, which uses a textbook compiled from notes, and a course on mechanics of materials, using pic related
CE, everything with Discrete Maths and Combinatorics in the title is a must in your repertoire.
>>7789366
taking an internal combustion engines class as one of my senior electives. the project is worth 60% of the grade. have to build/modify an IC engine and take a bunch of readings with Dyno Sim.
anybody got any ideas?
also, Solidworks flow simulation a shit.
How do I fucking focus on science and learning when video games and 4chan exist
Why do emotions overpower logic and reason
Have to fight your animal brain and instincts. Literally fighting yourself. It's tough when the source of all free knowledge is also the source of all distractions, so you could just buy books and get rid of your internet capabilities and computer for the time being.
http://waitbutwhy.com/2015/03/procrastination-matrix.html
>>7789317
Change your diet. That will help.
Can anyone familiar with Levi-Civita point me in the right direction with this? I must be messing something trivial up or forgetting some commutation.
Also, can anyone show this simply with differential forms? I don't know much about them except that they exist.
delta(ij) . a(j) = a(i), not a(j)
this might fix it
sorry if you're doing some weird index switching and I'm an idiot
Well for one the derivative operator doesn't commute with B.
what kind of program are you interested in taking? here's one i find neat.
>>7789260
Looks like a pretty standard physics program (which is good)
Doing a Master's in AE now, specializing in solid mechanics and composites, but if I ever do a second, Penn State's Master's in Acoustics would be cool
http://www.acs.psu.edu/DistanceEducation/CourseListing.aspx
>>7789276
do you think studying mechanical engineering is better than physics? i'm worried about losing the opportunity to have accreditation employment wise, but i'm worried about course selection being redundant since i already know how to use CAD and matlab.
>>7789285
Depends a lot on your goals, honestly. For me (and my family's finances), it was important to get a good-paying job as soon as possible, leaving further education for evening classes, so I went with Mechanical. It got me a great job right away, and I could still satisfy my physics curiosity through electives/extra classes.
If you're sure you want to go the PhD route, and aren't really that worried about employability in the short term, pure physics might be better.
Is this legit? average user of /sci is a genius?
>>7789228
You are retarded.
>>7789228
People lie and cheat. Most of the faggots doing IQ tests on here probably look up the answers.
>>7789241
Lol, that image is bullshit.
Thoughts on this math text book? It is required for this Calculus class im taking this semester.
Overpriced shit but if you need it you need it I guess.
>>7789232
It's not overpriced at all. You can rent it on Amazon for $18.
>>7789232
>shit
Care to elaborate?
This is incredible. This guy has an IQ higher than 200. His autism must be directed towards a scientific cause.
He derives the laws of quantum dynamics from Super Mario 64.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kpk2tdsPh0A
>>7789225
This is /v/ material, not /sci/ material.
>>7789225
Higher than 200? Where does it say that
Or are you a 14 year old fanboy
is it possible to do "weighted" gradient descent on piece wise defined functions?
>inb4 hurr durr retard
like doing a bias of one term over the other, if it is possible, what would the graph/gradients even look like or mean?
its easy to say that the gradients are pointing towards the downward/upward slope, but what would it geometrically look like in R3 for weighted piecewise functions?
I guess the functions would have to be differentiable and smooth. So it would look like any normal gradient, aesthetically. I don't know what you mean by weighted.
Crunch, rip or heat death? Which is most likely?
Dying a virgin is for you
>>7789218
Dying of AIDS is for you
>>7789224
autism
neat.
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1504.00333v3.pdf
Do you have any fraction of an idea of what that paper is saying?
>>7789328
what are you implying, friendo?
>>7789328
Gravity = EM