Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 1798. page

He's trying to prove e=mc^2 by using only the quadratic formula, a cube, a parabola and a random equation.
That's pretty impressive if you ask me

>Okay, Jeffrey, and everyone else! Listen! Get in position for the photo. Wait, why is nothing written on that board? Can you scribble some formulae down so our audience knows it's a maths class? Google something, quick. "A=1/2 bh" is apparently the area of a triangle, can you draw a triangle? Can you draw a cube somewhere else? Write E=mc^2 too. Quadratic formula should be good, and can you sketch a quadratic too? Okay, we're running out of time, just get in position!

File: frustrated-new-math-student-showing-his-frustration-example-45963119[1].jpg (119KB, 1300x957px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 1300x957px

Has this child unlocked an entirely new realm of mathematics?

>>7968520
all future posts in this thread + 1

>>7968520
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0lFQOmb6mVs

>>7968520
It is (0) of a numeral system.

>>7968486
Not a property of energy. A state that energy can be in.

>>7968486
>nothing more
You are nothing more than an idiot shitposter.
Explain.

How can mass be a property of energy if energy isn't anything physical? Isn't energy just a property of mass?

>>7968363
I'm just taking a guess here. 36 km/h converts to 10 m/s. 160 Volts*100 Amps gives 16000 Watts which converts to 16000 Joules/s which converts to 16000 Newton meters/second. When dividing by 10 meters/second we are left with 1600 Newtons. A lot of the time physics problems can be easily solved with dimensional analysis. Just know your units, what they represent, and cancel out as many as you can and you're left with the correct answer. However, I have no idea how efficiency plays into this so if anyone else could actually explain physically what I just calculated it would be appreciated.

>>7968381
>assuming 100% efficiency

>>7968363

How do you do 14?

looks grim af

File: CafjdQHUMAA6ZJm.jpg (50KB, 600x503px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 600x503px

>>7968360
You better bust out the factor 50+

We would be dead.

/thread

>>7968369
Just how dead?
Slow cancer death or instant obliteration dead?
>>7968368
I've never had to use suncream before lol

spiders don't eat mosquitos, they eat your children

Looks like a Dolomedes something to me, I don't think those eat mosquitoes, they're fishing spiders.
I might be wrong on the species though

>>7968316
Looks like a wolf spider to me.

>>7968286
>transhumanism
>space travel
>cyborgs
>DARPA
When people think about this stuff seriously, it's an indication we are already living in a new age dark age.
World is going straight to hell and you along with it, forget these dreams son.

>>7968286
JC Denton confirmed

I'm waiting for the day where I don't have to spend hours online researching/watching stuff and I could just brain beam everything I want in seconds and go on about my day.

Sheffied Hallam ofc

Durham

meet me there when you go too m8

underagefags FUCK OFF

>>7968193
this is impossibly easy. Just set up your straight edge so that it doesn't intersect line a.

>>7968203
Duh? Parallel?

>>7968193
draw a line through point D. Put 2 tick marks on each line a,b and your new line. This signifies they are parallel

>not using parentheses

it's like you want your shit to be confusing

What kind of x's are those?

you should use * for multiplication as a habit, because ∙ and x will mean completely different things once you get to linear algebra.
But yes, if you're just doing calculations like the ones on your picture then it doesn't matter how you write it, ∙ x or *, it's the same thing.

you dont know how fucking thick the atmosphere is

If only there were multiple websites with delta-V values that aren't porn sites for NEETs where you could find that information.

>>7968098
Google tells me that the fastest bullet goes 1.2 km/s. The earth's escape velocity is 10 times that.

I'm sorry. Everybody is busy defending pseudoscience.

it is a gas but the elite adds it to our water to poison us which is why it is a liquid

>>7967855
> small IQ brainlet can't contain his anger and has to madpost in other threads as well
poor kid

In all areas, yes, but you wouldn't be as valued as others in some positions, vice versa for certain position.

Your specialty being spread on many fields gives you a disadvantage in a position the only needs a specific specialty compared to someone who studied the same amount as you but focused on that specific field, but of course that means he's close to useless compared to you in positions that don't need that specific specialty.

The department chair of EE at my uni is essentially an applied physicist. Dude is crazy smart

>>7967785
Mine too, but according to him that's because AP tend to choose the academy route more often than EE

7/10

the AP classes were usually quite a bit harder than their college equivalents. About 2 or 3 of my teachers were really great

2/10
School was being shut down pretty soon, all the long-term teachers were leaving and for the last year before my actual GCSEs I had substitutes in nearly all lessons.
Only passed through thorough online revision; I guess that was probably the only benefit of not having friends/a social life

File: morris.jpg (42KB, 329x500px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 329x500px

I had a good chemistry teacher. Shame he was a vicious, sadistic paedophile who presided over a regime of casual violence and institutionalised abuse.

>>7967639
>geniuses used in a time of war

Andy dumbass can pull a trigger

>debate something that scientists don't know shit about it yet
Gee, I wonder where is this going.

i have this image of the mods here being 12 year old japanese kids