Is there really any point to studying a science if you aren't some 130+ IQ genius
>>8057738
money, you need to do something at the end of the day unless you win the lotto. if you like the kind of work why not? you still assist people with 130+ iq. and you never know you may figure something out, though you probably need more than 105 for that.
>>8057747
I'm only a 115 iq brainlet, but thankfully not as low as 105
Dont worry about iq op just do something that u are good at/enjoy.
Ive got a pretty high iq but i live rent free at home and make 20 an hr. Theres more to life than lamborghinis.
Italians are fags anyway
No Pre-Calculus, Calculus I-III, Differential Equations or elementary Linear Algebra questions allowed.
>>8050515
Start the thread off with one?
>>8050570
If all characteristic classes of a bundle vanish, does that imply the bundle is trivial?
What is the derivative of f(x)= e^x ?
>Phobos is an extremely, almost impossibly porous and light moon in a decaying orbit
>new information on Martian atmospheric loss suggests it took billions of years confirming Mars as a viable terraformation target
There is literally no reason to not terraform Mars by nuking Phobos out of orbit. The amount of dust and debris a collision like that could kick up would be more than enough to start the terraforming process and we have the technology to do this today. Phobos is already going to collide with the red planet so let's take advantage of it.
Give me one good reason we shouldn't nuke Phobos out of orbit, /sci/.
Yeah all you gotta do is wait 2 million years for the dust to settle
>>8045854
Woah woah woah now let's HOLD ON, here. This is an emotional moment for all of us, but this MOON has a substantial DOLLAR VALUE attached to it, okay? And if in fact any alien life forms do exist on Mars, there might be an important species we're dealing with, and I don't think you or I can make the decision to do something rash, that might arbitrarily exterminate them!
I will only pay for it if we actually get good video of this shit exploding.
I refuse to otherwise.
ITT: We find a magic square of square numbers.
There's a big price for it, €1000.
What is this and what are the conditions? The magic number could be 1.
>>8040794
All numbers can only appear once.
A magic square is a square where all the rows, columns and diagonals add up to the same sum.
>>8040797
Domain?
It's predicted that robots will replace human labors in future. Up to 50% of our job will be taken over. What will happen to the increasing amount of the unemployed?
>>8049426
favelas or working the land in relatively primitive conditions?
idk
>>8049426
Massive welfare state is the only plausible result
>>8049426
They'll all become gamers, long for and fund the development of virtual reality, and eventually I'll just upload everyone so I can stripmine the Earth into my ever-growing neural array.
It's either that or non-immortality. Personally I don't care which way you arrange your future atoms.
>there was a time when everyone thought airplanes were impossible, and they were wrong, therefore FTL is also possible
>>8050202
>I just don't trust what """""science""""" has to say anymore. One day they're telling you to eat more whole grains and the next they're telling you to avoid gluten!
>>8050202
> '' I watch top 10 videos on youtube so I am practically a scientist now :D: D: D: :D:D :D XDDXDD''
>just because I don't understand anything that I'm taught in school and refuse to teach myself doesn't mean I'm not SMART! I'm good at other stuff like listening to top 40 music and reading young adult fiction.
Remembering when /sci/ used to be populated with rational thinkers.
What happened /sci/?
It seems like when people jumped on the fake-nerd bang wagon, they also jumped on the science fanboy wagon without learning what the scientific method is.
And it's not just 4chan either.
Even in academia social sciences are promoted as are theoretical bullshit beliefs.
When did proof go out the window?
When did authoritarianism and false dilemmas become accepted?
What happened?
Most people are prone to psychotic egotism.
They lie all the time because they can't admit to being wrong.
Even when there is proof, like 4chan, where everything is recorded and in front of everyone, straw man arguments and false quotes are used more than anything.
/pol/ and 4chan are populated with psychotics.
>>8058881
Not the guy, but how buttblasted do you have to be to defend /pol/ in every post you see that mentions it? You aren't making any difference here, you might as well go back there so you don't waste time being upset at other people's posts.
>>8058881
Where does it indicate I'm a SJW?
How is promoting science and the scientific method shitposting?
Why do you think I'm stinking?
You're psychotic.
A new poll shows that the way you ask people about evolution can drastically change their response.
Researchers show that when the word “human” is replaced with "elephant” in the evolution question, 75% of Americans agree—about 25 percentage points higher than before.
>>8058041
learn to post links when you're citing something pls.
Sounds interesting. Post link!
>>8058041
evolution is not a fact, it's a description.
Believing in something is called a religion.
It's safe to assume that women are on their own mental category?
I don't want to mean they're mentally inferior, but we can see the paralel between women and male sports and how women world records are actually the same of a 13 year old male athlete and they lose to 14 year old males.
So, following that sense, can we assume that women are mentally inferior to what we consider male mathematicians and male scientists?
Has there been any case in history of science of a female that can be at the same level male geniuses had been?
I'm not making a troll thread, but I usually assumed high school girls were on average dumber because they were young, but after spending time on college, I see no diference.
>>8057815
Marie Curie
But for God's sake, 99% famous scientists and inventors in the last century was men.
Now 90% of the persons that change the world are still men. Women can go to the fucking dumpster.
>>8057825
what was her IQ?
what's the posibility of to find another female like her?
>>8057815
Yes, the typical woman operates on a lower level of consciousness.
Let's do the following fun experiment:
Take any of the following categories: science, math, art, literature, philosophy, politics, sports.
Make a list of the 10 greatest males in that field.
Make a list of the 10 greatest females in that field.
Now make a list of the 10 greatest _persons_ in that field.
How many females are in that last list?
The problem is that women are by nature purely sexual beings and emotionally as well as cognitively underdeveloped. They are driven basically only by an undifferentiated desire for sexual satisfaction, an infantile envy for other women and an extreme disgust against those men they consider unattractive. Women are anti-intellectual, irresponsible, remorseless, unempathetic, ambitionless, entitled, egotistic, hyperpromiscuous creatures whose existence is solely justified by their ability to give birth.
Why haven't we detected alien life yet? Imagije how the human society will look like in 3 BILLION years and tell me we wouldn't left detectable traces for any remotely intelligent life to detect in the entire galaxy or even control the growth and spread of all alien life.
So why can't we find anything?
And remember your explanations needs to satify not only one alien species but ALL alien species including future humans colonizing space.
You assume that super intelligent species would want to expand and spread everywhere like a bunch of monkeys
>>8052431
We do
You assume that NO super intelligent species ever would want to spread everywhere
>>8052424
Could it be that all life tries to kill itself before leaving for the stars?
Could it be that we are some of the earliest 'Smart' life out there.
Could it be that Aliens don't want others to find them because we are all doomed to killing each other off?
Could it be one alien per Galaxy.
Could X/ be right and there are aliens and our government is keeping it quite?
Well, /sci/?
Yeah that is a nice drawing well done
>>8052054
0.75^5 = 0.24
Therefore greater chance to negate all damage on bottom row, since 24% > 15%
Anything else?
>>8052076
It's 1 - 0.25^5, idiot
A new language is created that only uses the letters A, B, C, D, and E. A sequence of letters is called a word if it does not include the same letter twice in a row, and it does not include two vowels in a row. How many words are there in this language that are 10 letters long and that begin with a vowel?
How does /sci/ solve this?
>>8058064
by writing all the possible words and counting.
i really hate combinatorics problems
0 . You can't have words 10 letters long with no repeats allowed and only 5 letters...
Was it an inside job, /sci/?
>>8057367
> fuel has a max burning temp
I bet I can get it to burn hotter.
>>8057367
The whole thing was a hoax, the towers are still standing. If you don't think it's possible then here's your reminder that David Copperfield made the statue of liberty disappear, the USG obviously has better resources and better tricks than David Copperfield.
>>8057367
There less energy losses the larger temperature we can get. Fuel burn produce energy not temperature. If it is contain in enough small volume we can reach really great temperature.
What ways are there, even theoretically, to stop a kinetic bomb travelling at relativistic speeds from impacting it's target? (Assuming you are at that target)
Assuming the object is about the size of a 757, could we launch large spacecraft past it to knock it off it's trajectory via gravitational interference?
>>8054342
How far away can we intercept it?
>>8054342
rip
>>8054342
Currently we have no reasonable way to even detect such an object in time to take any counter measures.
http://www.strawpoll.me/10133154
I think you mean 'posthumanism'.
>>8051871
Posthumanism is when you fuck around with uploading and other magical bullshit.
Transhumanism is just getting robo legs or whatever.
>>8051871
They're apparently two different things, though transhumanism can result in a posthumanist civilization.