[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 1653. page

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

File: image.jpg (693KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
693KB, 2048x1536px
So I was exploring a superfund site today with some friends. I won't specify which specifically but I'll say that it's one of hundreds in Western NY, (USA). We came across this pit full of an almost glowing blue liquid. The white powdery looking buildup along the bottom makes me conclude that perhaps it's acidic? I was t going to touch and find out. Can anyone here shed light on what I'm looking at? Nothing came up when I tried to research it. Any insight would be greatly appreciated.
28 posts and 4 images submitted.
>>
>The white powdery looking buildup along the bottom makes me conclude that perhaps it's acidic
please explain how you came to this conclusion
>>
>>8098182
It's a hypothesis more than a conclusion which is why I also threw the word "perhaps" in there. Salicylic acid reacts with organic material that way that's how I came up with it. Then again sulfuric acid turns sugar black so I suppose I can see why it's not a great hypothesis. I'm not a chemist and didn't claim to be. I simply asked if anyone qualified coils identify this liquid/occurrence.
>>
>>8098119
Fucking use Google you faggot.

File: 1464042846649.png (80KB, 500x421px) Image search: [Google]
1464042846649.png
80KB, 500x421px
d/ic/k here.

I came here to ask what science topics should I learn to help me become a better draftmen and painter.

obviously anatomy, but how bout optics and other topics?

I've noticed art education is simplified education for retards where the teachers barely know the topics.
14 posts and 3 images submitted.
>>
File: gr8chat.png (158KB, 1500x1285px) Image search: [Google]
gr8chat.png
158KB, 1500x1285px
>>8098056
Drawing 3-d structures might be a worthy challenge to help you get better at drawing.
Functions such as u(x,t)=g(x)f(t) may be a good place to start but also accurately drawing relatively simple chemical structures if you're into that sort of thing.
>>
>>8098120
care to give a list of topics to google?
>>
Any preference of the topics given (functions or chemical structures) ? in essence they're the same

File: cow-441627.jpg (25KB, 590x350px) Image search: [Google]
cow-441627.jpg
25KB, 590x350px
How much methane does an adult cow actually have?

Let's say it it ate something and spontaneously combusted from within.

Would the concussive force produced be akin to a grenade and obliterate everything around it? Or would it be like a Dodongo in Zelda and just blow up a little and die?

I'm writing a story.
15 posts and 6 images submitted.
>>
>>8097998
They are literally Hindenburg waiting to explode.
>>
Technically, and this is from an ultra realistic scientific perspective mind you, cows have the equivalent of 100 tons of TNT or 1/2 the yield of an early atomic bomb packed to an area of about 6 square feet.
This is why farmers never combined traditional plowing with gas plows, due to the fact a simple malfunction could level a Country.
>>
File: image.jpg (44KB, 712x400px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
44KB, 712x400px
>>8098007
>literally

File: Starman.png (338KB, 517x875px) Image search: [Google]
Starman.png
338KB, 517x875px
How come we see some people as ugly as fuck, like, why dont we see everyone as beautiful? it would make it much easier to get a mate and reproduce if everyone was sexy or if we didnt see ugliness (does tht make sense), and thats what humans are supposed to do. i guess beauty can be subjective but i dont think anyone will think a really ugly person is good looking, maybe if they can look past the face and into the personality... but r humans supposed to see personality? isn't it ideal to have the most beautiful kids, as arent they the ones who are always naturally athletic and shit?
37 posts and 4 images submitted.
>>
>>8097997
>How come we see some people as ugly as fuck,

No it's pretty much just you
>>
back in ye olde days before the witchcraft of makeup and personalities and ye newfangled social constructs. beauty ~= correlates with health. which correlates with good living conditions and likelihood of successfully having/rasing kids
>>
Dunno man we are some complex fuckers who breed interspecies. Just watched a documentary about ducks and they are identical and apparently the mating is not based in the physical appearance, this happens in all nature with some preferences for size but we are the only who dont fit in that because we mate in different size, colors and forms.
Sorry if my engrish is shit

File: Bromomethane_IR_spectroscopy.png (34KB, 700x525px) Image search: [Google]
Bromomethane_IR_spectroscopy.png
34KB, 700x525px
I need to get good on spectroscopy theory, particularly vibrational and Raman. Any recommended textbooks?
15 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
this is obv not my field

but spectroscopy always gives me major aneurysms
>all that variability
>all that noise
>somehow manage to pull out 99% accuracy of whatever the fuck molecule

how
>>
>>8097965
Autism along with lots of trial and error to develop the theory. Spec is so fucking based though, I get to use an FTIR tomorrow
>>
>>8097994
Any advice on learning it?

File: aa.png (5KB, 756x413px) Image search: [Google]
aa.png
5KB, 756x413px
If 2 objects approach each other at the same speed ( 75% speed of light ) while they approach each other at the same speed.

What will be the relative speed of one object towards the other?

How fast will they hit each other? at the same speed they were going or will something happen at the point of impact?

What would happen at the impact?
30 posts and 5 images submitted.
>>
>>8097720
>What will be the relative speed of one object towards the other?

c*tanh( 2 * atanh(.75) ) = .96c
>>
Sorry I don't speak math/physics can you please answer my questions instead?

Google already answered me on how the equation would look like, it still does not make any sense if you don't read physics/math symbols as well as a musician reads music notes.
>>
>>8097736
It's fucking trig and a constant you learned in middle school.

File: wind_turbine_airflow5a.jpg (51KB, 473x250px) Image search: [Google]
wind_turbine_airflow5a.jpg
51KB, 473x250px
When cooling down a hot room, is it better to point a fan out to get rid of the hot air, or point the fan in to input cold air?
15 posts and 3 images submitted.
>>
>>8097710
If there's only one channel for the air to flow, they would both accomplish the same thing. You're not creating a vacuum when you turn a fan outside; an equivalent amount of air is coming into the room.
>>
>>8097710
If the fan is low to the ground, in and pointing up
>>
Better to aim it along a wall to get air circulating. It'll create a current that moves air in and out of the room.

vectors have a set of rules they need to obey (e.g. scalar addition/multiplication/etc)

Do matrices/tensors also have a set of governing rules?

>plz help
28 posts and 11 images submitted.
>>
>>8097375
The set of linear operators from a vector space V to a vector space W is itself a vector space.
>>
>>8097375
yes and no. "matrices" are not a group. it's easier if you restrict yourself to a set of matrices that all obey the same rules. for example, you can solve many problems if you only consider the set of NxN invertible matrices. those obey a similar set of rules as the ones you described.
>>
File: 1436709331160.jpg (64KB, 480x330px) Image search: [Google]
1436709331160.jpg
64KB, 480x330px
>>8097401
what about tensors?

File: image.jpg (64KB, 500x372px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
64KB, 500x372px
Do you really believe strength and intelligence are mutually exclusive?
Is this just jealousy from weak nerds who want to feel superior?
Or are physically smaller people really smarter than stronger people?
25 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
>>8097356
>Do you really believe strength and intelligence are mutually exclusive?
Me, no, most of /sci/, likely. There are fit intelligent people. And I find no shame in boney intelligent people either, different personal values.
>>
Yes. I don't know why it happens, but it's pretty clear to me if you just look at the types of people who tend to be strong, or rather, more masculine. Something about being very masculine precludes you from developing intellectually. I suspect it's because instinctual drives are stronger in more masculine men, and so they cannot override them as easily as some of us here can.
>>
>>8097366
There are fit intelligent people. No one disputes this. But there is a clear trend all the same.

File: pic.png (219KB, 777x656px) Image search: [Google]
pic.png
219KB, 777x656px
Quick engineering question for a project I'm working on. I've spent at least 20 hours trying to figure this out on my own but I'm more confused than ever. I have a new respect for engineers now


I am building something that moves a component over an area 80 cm x 100 cm (pic related).

This is the belt (longer followed by shorter):
.080" (MXL) Pitch, 488 Teeth, 3/8" Wide Single Sided Neoprene Belt with Fiberglass Cords

.080" (MXL) Pitch, 390 Teeth, 3/8" Wide Single Sided Neoprene Belt with Fiberglass Cords

This is the pulley:
2.03 mm (MXL) Pitch,18 Teeth, 4mm Bore, 2 Flanges/With Hub, Aluminum Alloy Timing Pulley for 9.5mm Wide Belt


If I want ±0.1 mm accuracy, would a 0.72° resolution stepper motor suffice? 1.8°?

How much should I tension the belt?
17 posts and 4 images submitted.
>>
File: 1438572076186.jpg (68KB, 700x700px) Image search: [Google]
1438572076186.jpg
68KB, 700x700px
>>8097323
Also... do those parts work? Or did I fuck that up also?
>>
>>8097323
Shit, forgot to mention:

First belt is 39.04 inchs (pitch diameter)
second is 31.20 inches
>>
>>8097323
pls provide links to documentation, I can't access any page

File: starshot.jpg (65KB, 728x646px) Image search: [Google]
starshot.jpg
65KB, 728x646px
wat?
12 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
nothing makes science work better than cold war and war.
>>
>>8097220
Actually the best source of science is atheism. The greatest discoveries were made in an effort to disprove religion.
>>
>>8097200
i meant to add the link too
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/05/us-lawmaker-orders-nasa-plan-trip-alpha-centauri-100th-anniversary-moon-landing

>>8097234
does this project disprove religion?

File: tinfoil.jpg (64KB, 433x498px) Image search: [Google]
tinfoil.jpg
64KB, 433x498px
Anyways i was browsing /pol/ out of boredome and i saw a redpill page saiyng that evrything is not what it seems.Long story short i made up a little theory (BASED OFF WHAT THE REDPILL SAID).It explains why certain laws conflict with eachother and why we cant give logical explanations to them.

It goes like this. Evrithing is actualy simulated (we are just a computer simulation and evrything around us - might explain parrarel universes because there could be more simulations going at once). The entire time space continoum could be a computer simulation so thats why certain branches of phisics are so different from clasical mehanics phisics and why we couldnt give propper explanations to certain laws or formulas because we would be trying to explain a unfinished computer simulation or we would be pushing the limits of what the simulation can do. Thats why the laws and formulas are unexplainabel or dont make sence because the formulas would interfere with the simulation because if we logicaly aplied them we would be pushing the limits of what the simulation can achive and if we probed deeper we would find out that we are actualy just a computer program.

Also im not all that aquainted with phisics i preffer chemistry so evrything i just said could be totaly wrong.

I just wanna hear your tohughts on this.

Sry for bad grammar im not english.
28 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
Yes, you are your own minimal simulation.
>>
how old are you OP? just curious
>>
>>8097183
Unfalsifiable, makes zero impact on the universe itself, meaningless pseudoscience. You can believe it, but it's even less meaningful than believing in religion.

File: variegated_tiles.jpg (33KB, 300x281px) Image search: [Google]
variegated_tiles.jpg
33KB, 300x281px
does anyone have any ideas about ways to count the number of ways an n x m grid of squares could be dissected into (1x1), (1x2), & (2x2) rectangular tiles?

I was considering trying a computer program to model it, but I'm not even sure how to start.

This is a question that comes into my head a lot when I'm in my bathroom, looking down at the pattern of tiles on the floor. (it's called a variegated pattern apparently.)

For easier version: just use (1x1) and (2x1) tiles.
33 posts and 4 images submitted.
>>
for starters, I know that if the total area consists of A = n x m places, the number of patterns must be less than A^A / A!,
based on the idea of there being up to A 'belongingship' categories, with each tile being one of those at random.
this does not yet restrict a category to be constrained to including only cells next to each other, or to having certain shapes.
>>
you could probably also make graphs that connect every configuration by operations that either:
> connect two adjacent 1x1 squares into a 2x1
> split a 2x1 into two 1x1 squares
> connect two long-edge adjacent 2x1 tiles into a 2x2 tile
> split a 2x2 into two 2x1 tiles (two ways to do this)

then you maybe could analyze the topology of that graph - there would be a structure based on values that tell you a) the number of 2x1 tiles b) the number of 2x2 tiles
>>
for 2xn, I get a result that says add the numbers in the vector that results from multiplying a vector
[1 0 0] by the matrix [[1 0 1][1 1 1][2 2 1]] raised to the nth power.

File: IMG_20160305_171317.jpg (2MB, 1920x1920px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_20160305_171317.jpg
2MB, 1920x1920px
Hey, /sci/, I want to order a book off amazon that helps me understand concepts on astronomy and whatnot, but also keeps itself interesting. I don't want a huge text book just like a novel length of something. Any suggestions?
12 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
File: 1269197270000.jpg (198KB, 474x626px) Image search: [Google]
1269197270000.jpg
198KB, 474x626px
>>8097160

The Manga Guide to the Universe
http://www.amazon.com/Manga-Guide-Universe-Kenji-Ishikawa/dp/1593272677

Otherwise suck it up and get the big orange book (Carroll and Ostlie's An Introduction to Modern Astrophysics) then slowly read through it and motivate yourself along the way.
>>
>>8097393
>Be me
>Interested with the idea of the manga guides
>Have some free time after finishing up a manga, probably Holyland.
>Decide to pick up the manga guide to calculus, even though I already know all of it
>Writing is decent
>Nice comedy
>Everything is fine, would read all of it simply for the entertainment... except for

FUCKING LEFT TO RIGHT READING WHY THE FUCK DID YOU DO THAT, THAT FUCKS ME UP SO MUCH IN THE HEAD.

You do not understand, I only read manga and I only masturbate to hentai manga so when I see comics, I read from right to left... BUT THESE FUCKING NIGGERS HAD TO DO THEIR WHITE CIS SCUM APPEAL THING AND DO THEIR SHIT LEFT TO RIGHT.

This is why I hate white people in 2016.
>>
>>8097422
>English translation should be reversed as is standard of Japanese books simply because of its source
Yeah, no one in America will complain about that. Good idea.

File: 1464123695993742674187.jpg (260KB, 2336x4160px) Image search: [Google]
1464123695993742674187.jpg
260KB, 2336x4160px
Why can heat be transmitted through empty space/vacuum? Sound, for example, needs air or water to do so, but heat doesn't.
19 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
>>8097116
heat cannot be transmitted through space/vacuum.
heat is transmitted through a medium.

radiation can be transmitted through space and vacuum though, because it's an electromagnetic wave.
>>
Use your fucking brain, stupid.
And your statement isn't inherently true.
Google black body radiation you dumb motherfucker.
>>
Vacuum is filled with aether. Aether is a medium for electromagnetic waves

Pages: [First page] [Previous page] [1643] [1644] [1645] [1646] [1647] [1648] [1649] [1650] [1651] [1652] [1653] [1654] [1655] [1656] [1657] [1658] [1659] [1660] [1661] [1662] [1663] [Next page] [Last page]

[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.