>Sarkar had accused the victim of stealing his computer code and giving it to someone else, according to police.
Would you kill your professor took the source code from your PhD project and gave it to another student?
http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-mainak-sarkar-ucla-20160602-snap-story.html
>>8117756
the number of times I have seen someone on this board claim others are paranoid because they want to protect themselves from theft is staggering.
And yet...
Should have used GPLv3
Apparently the pooinloo was really shit and the professor guided him after hours to just make him pass courses.
I've met people like this at uni and they just never fucking learn.
Common Core Hate Thread (I have a Algebra II Test coming up this week)
>>8112168
Common core exists to diminish the divide between whites/asians and blacks/hispanics.
Prove me wrong.
if you guys could add to my folder that'd be nice
>>8112178
"Spooky action at a distance".
2 particles are involved in quantum entanglement and when one is measured the state of the other particle is instantly known, sure. But I really don't understand why this is considered spooky or strange. Why can't these particles ALWAYS be opposites, regardless of anything? Is it so weird to be able to see what side of the coin is facing the floor when you toss it?
For starters, action at a distance was resolved a long time ago, with the introduction of the force field to physics.
Entanglement is peculiar because the moment the state of one particle is determined, the probabilistic nature of the other is "collapsed" and it's state is known as well. The surprising part is that if the particles are physically separated, it doesn't seem as if there is any time delay between the two measurements. In other words, they happen instantaneously. That really just means that no signal or wave or whatever is being sent from one particle to another.
It's not that startling really. But our inability to explain it properly says a lot about the interpretation of quantum theory and how phenomena like this give rise to the phenomena of large-scale systems.
>>8112079
If you have a signal apparently travelling faster than light its pretty startling
>>8112098
I just said there was no signal.
Out of all the options, what would be the best, most plausible, or easiest satellites to colonize?
>The moon
>Mars
>Venus
>Titan
>Europa
Bonus: What's /sci/'s opinion on Terra forming? Is it a good idea? or would domed and floating cities be a better idea, hypothetically saying we would have levitation technology
>>8111450
Damun.
>>8111450
The moon, absolutely.
>>8111467
Cuz dey got cheese n shiet there.
I'm self-studying and completing the exercises. This text doesn't have any solutions to the proofs and even though I'm confident I'm doing some of these problems correctly I have no way of knowing 100% if I made a mistake somewhere.
This can give the reader a false sense of security they are doing the exercises correctly without validating their work.
Why are math textbooks like this?
Theorem-Proof-Exercises-No solutions to check work
Because they expect you to buy a solutions manual. Also most students are lazy and would just copy the answers.
It sucks I know.
>>8116375
>solutions manual
>just copy the answers
lol what kind of baby level book are you talking about
This drives me nuts in just about every textbook I own.
>Stars, planets, and gas make up only 5 percent of the Universe. The rest is 25 percent dark matter and 70 percent dark energy, both of which are invisible and have never been directly detected.
This theory sure gets trotted out as immutable fact a lot lately. When will science admit that cosmology is just plain broken?
>>8118590
Would you prefer the alternative?
>>8118590
>Stars, planets, and gas make up only 5 percent of the Universe
Correction: observable matter only holds 5% of the total energy content of the Universe. The rest is divided into matter which we cannot see, and an energy density of free space which drives the accelerated expansion of spacetime.
>>8118594
It's about as substantiated.
0^0 = 1
Prove me wrong.
Pro tip: You can't.
Because it's not wrong. One times zero, zero times is still one.
It's not wrong.
>>8114959
If it makes you feel any better, google calculator agrees with you even though you're wrong.
Are the days of edgy experiments on animals over?
everyone's a psychologist nowadays
>>8113761
>implying America isn't just one big social experiment.
That picture makes me sad
This is literally the scariest thing I've ever heard of
>>8114226
Retarded form of Pascal's Wager
Spaghetti Lord will rise from the dead when the 3 meatballs descend from the sky. All who devoured spaghetti or did not stop the devouring of spaghetti throughout time must be vanquished.
>>8114226
You are stupid.
>>8114226
So start developing the benevolent super ai, retard.
is neuroscience a meme? is it actual science? my friend told me any field with the word "science" in it is not actually science and just pretending to be. Is this true? For example politcal science, computer science are not science.
im interested in neuroscience but only want to join a real science and not get ridiculed
at least it's more sciency than psychology
>>8109193
lol, what a good rule of thumb. Haven't heard that one yet, thanks op.
You should do you want though regardless of what /sci/ thinks. Just make sure your investment pans out (for some just gaining that knowledge is enough for it to pan out, but obviously monetary compensation is desirable//necassary
>>8109193
Well, by that logic, physics, chemistry and biology aren't sciences either since they are physical sciences and life science accordingly. How about you read up on what neuroscience is and decide for yourself? Also, I've heard so many people tell me they are interested in neuroscience it's not even funny. Neuroscience is a subfield of biology. Are you interested in biology? Do you know anything about it?
If you trust your friend's dumb definition, you probably won't succeed in science anyway, so don't bother.
lets go.
So how do we get there? If you say warp drive or EM drive, please remove yourself from the gene pool
>>8111851
You know, we just need a ship that's capable of near lightspeed travel, and also large enough to carry enough living space to sustain a colony for 1200 years
Yeah, space travel is fucking impossible
>>8111865
Let's not go then.
>this triggers the sciencetards
>>8116529
>doesn't post the link
triggered
>>8116533
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1TerTgDEgUE
>>8116537
>posts the link
clickbait shill
The other one is at the bump limit
Why is slope-intercept form so popular, and why do we not use the x-intercept instead of the y-intercept?
>>8107697
> x-intercept and y-intercept
what is the difference?
>>8107700
I mean instead of [math]y=mx + b[/math] why is it not [math]x=\frac{y-b}{m}[/math] the more popular form. Or maybe even something else
Who was the greatest genius of the 20th century?
Has to be one of these guys
Feynman or Woodward, IMO
>>8105350
>feynman
>ahead of Einstein or Neumann
>>8105351
he was smart and not elitist
he conveyed his ideas with poise and clarity
he had a successful marriage and life outside academia
he was remembered extremely fondly by everyone
the others were borderline autists who if they hadnt invented what they did would surely of been looked down upon
What does /sci/ do?
What did /sci/ study?
>>8103856
Computer Science.
Please just end it for me familia
>>8103860
>he actually fell for the meme
>>8103856
>What does /sci/ do?
some dat dere dank 420
What did /sci/ study?
physics