>housemate studies chemistry
>already knew she believed in ghosts, astrology and other quack shit
>find out she believes in homeopathy
>ask her how she can believe it when she understands some of the chemistry of how it wouldn't work
>she can't answer but refuses to believe they don't
How does that even work?
>>8121577
I've met some people who believe in homeopathy but they weren't science majors. Tbqh I've never met any science majors that believed in pseudoscience, although I'm sure that has to do with the kind of people I hang out with.
Hell, even Steve Jobs refused to get actual medical treatment for his cancer because he believed in alternative medicine. It's kind of unfathomable to me how people do that, but w/e.
>>8121586
Yea she's the first person I've met who both studies and excels in a science, while also believing in lots of bullshit. It baffles me, especially when lots of what she believes in goes against basic chemistry (she's big into alternative medicine)
[Note: I'm am atheist]
My family are young-earth creationists.
I also went to a religious boarding school.
My therapist wrote a book about Christian therapy practices.
About 99% of people I know believe stereotyping people is a form of psychological insight.
I had a roommate that used to light catholic vigil candles believing they did all sorts of things.
Vegan roommate that believed in all sorts of vegan hocus pocus.
Had a friend that refused to believe in atoms.
I could go on.
This is an interesting clash of Neuroscience and Philosophy, but I cannot help but ask:
Is Free Will actually a thing?
I'm not saying that all our choices are predetermined by something,
Does Free Will mean to have an unlimited number of choices, if so then currently this is not appliable to real life (see punishment by law etc.)
>inb4 we live in the Matrix
>>8121339
Free will is an outdated meme. It literally cannot be defined coherently without losing all meaning.
>>8121342
Meaning is not even the problem...
Nothing matters and I got no problem with that, but even if so, as a human, knowing that literally no of my actions will have an impact in say... 10k years is already disdaining, but knowing that all my "choices" weren't mine to begin with, now that's what'd put most people into a noose
>>8121349
>there is no free will
>there is no god
>there is objective morality
>life has no meaning
>your consciousness is merely a passively suffering observer of a life over which you have no control
Sometimes the red pill is hard to swallow. Enjoy your existential crisis.
File attached: gorilla.jpg
Which word is best to call a flavored sugar water?
Pop
Soda
Coke
Soft Drink
Carbonated Beverage
Have you ever found that smarter people tend to call it something different than dumb or average people?
>>8120201
Lemonade.
Purple drank
Coke
Lemonade
Dr Pepper
just by brand names or overarching type
Is psychology considered science on /sci/ or would you guys say its more of a humanities/social study?
>>8119505
It's a science all right; it just severely lacks the rigor of natural sciences like biology, chemistry and physics, leading to a large percentage of irreplicable results, which in turn makes /sci/ hate it.
That said, I do think there is a (very) small number of psychfags here, so you might get an answer if you post a question and ignore the "psychology isn't science" posts that will inevitably come.
>>8119509
Psychology has many fields which differ in their techniques. You could say that social/cultural psychology is a social science, but you can't say that for biopsychology or cognitive pshycology.
Still, I think there is a difference between even the "hardest" field of psychology and chemistry, for example.
>>8119505
>subjective
>non-reproducible
>non-measurable
Sure, it's science bro.
How do you justify contributing to humanity?
What reason do you have that you want to propel humanity towards more power or capability?
I find it extremely hard to justify contributing to a "general good" versus taking an extremely selfish approach to things.
For instance why does Elon Musk sleep on the assembly line when he can just cash out his money and do anything he wants? He is logical enough to understand that his work is pointless ultimately.
>>8119204
>justify contributing
wat
>>8119204
how is this even remotely a /sci/ topic?
>>8119210
Scientists are relatively the least paid in comparison to contribution to society. Why would you wish to help humanity at self-expense.
Are insects advanced enough to feel emotions and empathize with other members of their species? I've heard many people say insects are like organic robots which have no thoughts and feel no emotion. But that would mean that insects are no more advanced than bacteria, which can't be true. Is there any consensus in the scientific community about how advanced insects are?
>>8118797
God gave them a complex social life - it doesn't work the same way it works in mammals but there's a pleasure in their life and there are some sorts of emotions.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WFilNsLUvT0
All forms of life in the state God made them cherish life.
>>8118797
>insects are like organic robots
same as other animals
It is generally discouraged to think of organisms as more or less advanced because we tend to define advanced as "human like" (e.g. having emotion and empathy, complex body form and various tissue types). But all these things are just adaptations to very unique niches. Some are newer than others, but all organisms alive today are here because they are adapted to their niche. Emotion and empathy are just adaptations unique to vertebrates, and likely arose due to a combination of traits and selection unique to some of these organisms'(our) history.
In short were all organic robots anon
Thoughts on psychiatry? Not psychology, but psychiatry?
Diagnosing people as mad has more to do with social control than therapy. Many of those labeled as schizophrenic, bipolar, and other kinds of "mad" are not ill. ... They are seeing and feeling what is wrong with society and what needs to be done to change it.
>noble lunatic meme
>>8132809
>Found the schizo Scientologist
Would a grey goo scenario be possible?
I think the guy who coined that said he was just being paranoid or something like that.
>>8132260
But he have good reasons for tho, these are tiny machines that consume and devour all matters, effectively making it an even more dangerous form of a pandemic. A literal devourer of worlds
Honestly I would shat my pants straight instead of simple paranoia
waste heat
What does /sci/ think of the new names?
>Nihonium
>Muscovium - I called this one :^)
>Tennessine
>Oganesson
>Nihonium
>>8131946
First blush: I like them, nice mix of place names and some dude's name.
I also love that the row is officially done now, in the most important sense. They should declare chemistry to be over and not look for anything higher, so as not to screw up the table.
>>8131977
>not look for anything higher
There's still the island of stability to look forward to
What are some good no-bullshit meditation regimens?
Experiencing tranquility.
>>8116078
Meditation isn't necessarily good, in my experience at least; it can potentiated latent psychological. In my case: depersonalization, depression, suicidal thoughts and extreme anxiety.
That being said it can be beneficial. Just focus on your breathing and try not to think in words for 10-30 when ever you find time in the day. You'll know you're meditating when you realize you are experiencing strange phenomena and and occasional vivid visions, but when you realize that you'll break meditation. You just have to keep going at it and you'll know when you've got it.
>>8116195
after glancing over what I just posted, I think it may have made me retarded as well.
Post textbooks for your field of studies or recommend textbooks to others.
Other thread will 404 soon.
atkins, jones & laverman - chemical principles: the quest for insight
8/10 for learning the basics
> We're probably not living in "base reality"
Elon Musk believes that the reality we live in is a simulation, and we're not living in the actual world.
http://www.popsci.com/elon-musk-says-we-could-be-simulation
http://www.vox.com/2016/6/2/11837608/elon-musk-simulation-argument
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2KK_kzrJPS8
Where is your god now /sci/ ?
OJ Simpson was great at football.
>>8125732
A retarded opinion is retarded regardless of the person who holds it
>smart theoretical physicists and computer scientists make a claim
>no one listens
>billionaire recites the argument in a butchered janky way that makes no sense
>aspies cant stop talking about it
If you want to be a successful scientist, question the validity of your source.
The madman is actually going to do it
>>8117199
Nah.
>listening to a what a company says
Lel. As much as Muskfags hate to admit it NASA is the best and only shot.
first it was 2004, then 2008, then 2015, then 2017, then 2018, now 2025.
Uh, how safe are these things really?
Seems like a pebble could fuck your shit up, am i right?
>>8128113
>Be moving at same speed as pebbles = no problem
>Pebbles move counter clockwise = PepsiMax
It's like made of kevlar m8. Honestly we don't know what it is made of, but it meets NASA's safety standards
>>8128120
its made of post-its
Are vectors entities that can only be described in retangular coordinates? I mean, can i write a vector like pic related? If so, can I work with them like normal vectors? It looks weird to me because units dont match... anyway thanks
>>8129288
yes
>>8129288
>Are vectors entities that can only be described in retangular coordinates?
No.
>>8129318
my answer was for your second question