Predicting outcomes based on correlations in historical data is for faggots.
Please use a deterministic method.
>>8252215
you can't
based on previous data from this thread, there is
100% chance this post ends in > 5
>>8252215
Ban p-values and assuming everything is gaussian. Don't ban statistics.
Females do not value independent thought.
Females have not been trained to value independent thought.
Females have been trained to not value independent thought.
I lack the ability to comprehend female thought.
Discuss.
>>8252187
Well you're right that you don't comprehend women.
>>8252187
saged on principle you cis scum
There was a study in Romania recently
Sample size 30,000
Conclusively, there were no differences between men and women
If reality is a simulation, how do I turn on cheat codes?
>>8252165
sell your soul to satan
>>8252165
Find a bug in the code and manipulate it.
Good luck
>>8252167
>NPCs can turn on cheats
Are you high
So how many races are there?
3, 4, 5, 30?
Zero.
>>8252153
>falling for the "there are no races, but the human race" meme
https://postimg dot org/gallery/l7a3489k/1e469081
At least 2
Is there a name for the phenomenon of linking two irrelevant traits together with one always being the motive? Particularly for a crime such as "This person robbed a store, and he's black, therefor he robbed the story because he's black." I've seen it applied to everything under the sun as a convenient way to disparage a group, particularly minorities but not strictly.
>>8252144
Check the list of fallacies, the word you're looking for should be there
>>8252144
"correlation implies causation"
that said, black people commit far more crime than whites. that's a fact. take that as you will.
>>8252150
I don't disagree, but that doesn't explain why.
Thanks guys.
Can you help me understand the differences between the different economic courses/schools? Such as Economics, Business Studies, Accounting, Finance, Actuary?
>>8251976
>economics
study of how an economy behaves in terms of its scarce resources with alternative uses
>business studies
this is so vague, who knows. it probably touches on principles of running a business, from marketing to economic demand.
>accounting
professional shekel counting
>finance
theory and methods surrounding investments. money math. think stock broker
>actuary
calculating risk for insurance policies
>>8252004
Which one do you think would be the most profitable right now?
Well, I'm a huge fraud.
Physics PhD student here, and I can't answer a simple question asked by an undergrad about the double slit experiment.
What exactly is going on with how the beam particles interact with the slit? Are they interacting with the particles that make up the screen? How do the particles that make up the screen respond to interacting with the incoming particles?
its a bullshit that has been debunked. you get the same pattern with a single slit as well.
just another scam by scientists to hype some retarded unrealistic shit over a basic reflection pattern.
It does not interact.
Having two slits answered had a purpose to prove a hypothesis.
>>8251828
Don't worry anon. It's common to forget the basis once you get to higher levels. I would have a hard time doing factoring even though I know Calculus 3 by heart. I saw it all the time with my teacher assistants.
What field of biology do I do research in to make the world a better place?
I'd like to work on extending human life, is the MD/PhD the route to go?
What are some oncoming advances in the field of biology?
I know a lot of people (especially here) claim biology is dumb and such but I do think that this is one of the fields that"s beginning to shape our future.
>>8251817
Pharmacology, develop drugs that help extend the functionality and stability of cells.
>>8251835
won't that just make me end up in a rite aid selling drugs to obese drug addicts
>>8251817
Any. Pick the one you like best. They all overlap to some degree so anything you contribute in one area can still be used in others to some degree.
New research suggests that it is possible to create a new form of light by binding light to a single electron, combining the properties of both.
According to the scientists behind the study, from Imperial College London, the coupled light and electron would have properties that could lead to circuits that work with packages of light - photons - instead of electrons.
http://www.opli.net/opli_magazine/eo/2016/scientists-discover-light-could-exist-in-a-previously-unknown-form-aug-news/
>>8251729
>New research suggests that it is possible to create a new form of light by binding light to a single electron, combining the properties of both.
That don't make no sense
>>8251729
>lead to circuits that work with packages of light - photons - instead of electrons
...we already have that. The field covering it is called photonics.
>you need oxygen to live but it also kills you slowly because it's poison
>you need to exercise to be healthy and live long but exercise makes you consume more oxygen and food
>You need food to live but calories are linked to shorter lifespans
Wtf is up with this?
Am I missing something?
>you die
Wtf is up with this?
Am I missing something?
>>8251513
Holy shit that's a better question actually.
Well you see anon around 6,000 years ago someone ate an apple because a snek told her to but it was a bad apple so now all of mankind is cursed by the benevolent ghostman in the sky.
Okay /sci/, what do you think about this?
Link to article: https://www.scribd.com/document/319906948/The-Solution-to-the-Ice-Age-Extinctions
I am not the author, but have permission to reproduce. This paper is a bit quirky, has a few typos, and is written in a narrative style, but should be more than controversial enough for your tastes!
>Science is a collection of stories we like to tell eachother about how the world works.
Stopped reading there
>>8251207
>The title is a double entendre
Non-native English speaker here, where in the actual fuck is a double meaning in "The Solution to the Ice Age Extinctions"?
>>8251241
But that's true, m8.
starting my math journey know, got Spivak's calculus and How to Prove It
What am I in for? How long until I can move onto things like abstract algebra and topology? Pretty excited.
>>8251195
now* kek guess an english journey should help
>still in calculus 1
kek, you have a few years ahead
>>8251199
that's fine man. How long? And does the book cover everything I'll need for calculus?
What's the best argument against the existence of chemtrails?
I was thinking of the impossibility of such a large conspiracy to have place with so many people involved, but maybe there is a better rebuttal?
>>8251081
According to Darwin's theory, the people who deliberately pollute the air that they themselves breathe will die and thus it will stop occurring.
>global elite poison the air
>global elite then breathe the air
>??????
>>8251081
Nice bait
If you walked off a really long wooden plank or something that was placed on the ground, could you walk into space?
Yes but your plank would have to be impossibly strong to stay rigid
considering the fact that world is flat, No.
Kerbal Space Programm simulates that with their airfields. When starting planes on the end of the runway they start rolling forwards because the airfield is perfectly flat and quite big relative to the planet. Its ends are higher up than the middle part.
If it was longer, and perfectly flat, you could drive into space.
>"Hey Professor, can you explain something you mentioned previously in class? I didn't quite understand."
>What the fuck faggot, you are not supposed to be seeking teachers for help. In fact you are not supposed to be in the position of seeking teacher for help, ever, unless it is in a fucking lab or on a machine. Either read extended literary works that expound and build upon the shit you were given in classes, or become a helper at a workplace related to your fucking studies to see how shit works and how that shit is applied. I'm not here after class to spoonfeed you beyond the basic necessity because then your brain would never develop independent critical thinking skills. This isn't fucking highschool.
>>8250938
He's right, you know.
>>8250960
Incorrect.
>"HIghschool teachers said I could get proper explanations in college. They were even less likely to solve my questions, so what do you mean by this isn't highschool? I am asking you a simple question specifically related to the subject that you teach. If you say you don't know, then why are you a teacher? And if you say my teachers were wrong, then I was right to mistreat them, and I would be right to not consider what you say because I am going deep for a PhD. Do you think I am satisfied with you? Then how are you unsatisfied with my simple question? And how is any student who thinks critically satisfied with your shameless sophistry? I don't want you to suffer any formal punishment if you are simply able and willing to answer my question now. Do you think I am here for free? Do you really think I am happy?"