Have we made any significant progress towards being able to "freeze" people without rupturing every single cell in their body? I know there's that special liquid that doesn't freeze but it doesn't seem practical to replace every single cell with it and then undo it later.
>>8301023
>cryogenics
>science
Back to >>>/lesswrong/
>>8301023
All you need to do is travel near the speed of light and time will slow down enough that it'll take a few minutes to travel years into the future so just do that OP
>>8301023
http://www.arigosbiomedical.com/
currently our best bet for improvement.
What are some unethical experients scientists could do that would be good?
like raising children from birth in total darkness and then exposing them to light when they're old enough and see what it would like to let people blind from birth see.
or breed humans and chimps to create hybrids which scientists do say is technically possible.
>>8301000
Millenial trips, nice.
You think worse experiments haven't and aren't being performed?
How about a real life allegory of cave?
>taking online calculus class in community college because it's my only option for calc
>we're just given homework, no teaching
>can sort of do the problems but don't really understand what I'm doing
I've looked at the wiki but my question is what book would you recommend I read to actually learn calculus instead of just sort of knowing how to do some of the problems?
The people on /sci/ can solve your piddly little calculus problems standing on their head.
james stewart's calculus is a good choice because it's made for self-learning.
https://www.amazon.com/Calculus-James-Stewart/dp/1285740629/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1472297369&sr=1-1&keywords=james+stewart+calculus
you can find all volumes in pdf online for free after some googling
surely there are more strict introductory calculus books out there like spivak, apostol and etc but unless you're looking forward to some unwanted mental masturbation there's really no need for them. it will depend on your goals.
>>8300999
https://www.amazon.com/Manga-Guide-Calculus-Hiroyuki-Kojima/dp/1593271948/
https://www.amazon.com/Calculus-Intuitive-Physical-Approach-Mathematics/dp/0486404536
https://www.amazon.com/Calculus-Analytic-Geometry-George-Simmons/dp/0070576424
There is for sqrt(x)=i
,but none for sqrt(x)=-1
[math]\sqrt{-1} [/math]
>>8300936
sqrt(1)=+/-1
kys
Whatever the solution of
[math] \sqrt{x} = -1 [/math]
was, if would fulfill
[math] (\sqrt{x})^2 = (-1)^2 = 1 [/math]
and as long as we stick to [math] (\sqrt{x})^2 = x [/math],
this means the task was to find an object with
[math] x^2 = 1 [/math]
If we read 1 as the two-dimensional unit matrix
I = ((1,0), (0,1)),
then
i = ((0, -1), (1, 0))
does the trick.
In the field of matrices for the form
a·I+b·i
the equation
[math] x^2 = I [/math]
has a solution, namely
[math] x = i [/math]
Now to your question.
If we stick to + meaning a commutative operation and we want to extend the real numbers (a vector space over R), then a solution to
[math] \sqrt{x} = -1 [/math]
implies a solution to
[math] \sqrt{1+y} = -1 [/math]
for some y
but then
[math] 1+y = (-1)^2 = 1 [/math]
and
[math] y = 0 [/math]
IF there is a solution then it's
x = 1+y = 1+0 = 1
But if the square root ought to be a function (not related to values poping out of continuations alla Riemann), then we take [math] \sqrt{1} = +1 [/math]
By roughly what year would you expect us to have cures (by 'cures', I mean complete solutions that can reverse the condition and return the patient to their former biological and mental state; not palliatives, things that only slow down degenerative conditions or treatments that deal only with symptoms) for the following:
Deafness
Blindness
Alzheimer's disease
Sarcopenia
Cancers (note: feel free to specify specific timeframes for each type of cancer if possible)
Erectile dysfunction
Baldness
Diabetes (type 1 and type 2)
Nephropathy
Parkinson's disease
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Low intelligence (not just mental retardation (IQ < 70), but low intelligence in general)
Heart disease
Cerebrovascular disease
Ageing (by a 'cure' to ageing, I mean an intervention or array of interventions which could keep a patient in a condition akin to that of their early 20s indefinitely (either with or without regular treatments) and reverse the damage accumulated to the body over time; so that someone could be chronologically 100 years old but have the general health, physical appearance and mental ability that they had when they were 25 years old).
I am interested to see your estimates
Deafness 2020-2030
Blindness 2020-2030
Alzheimer's disease 2040-2050
Sarcopenia 2025-2035
Cancers 2025 - 2040
Erectile dysfunction 2020-2030
Baldness 2020-2025
Diabetes 2020-2030
Nephropathy 2030-2040
Parkinson's disease 2030-2040
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis 2025-2035
Low intelligence 2040?
Heart disease 2025 - 2035
Cerebrovascular disease 2040-2050
Ageing 2050
Someone who tells you that is either bullshitting you or trying to sell you something. The fact is, no one can predict the future and whatever challenges may appear on the way. A specific cure for Parkinson's disease is extremely unlikely considering the damage is permanent for example. People who estimate this shit is so full of shit I'd flush them into the toilet like the turds that that they are.
Blindness and deafness can, depending on the type, already be cured to a degree. Not returning 20/20 vision or anything tho.
Immunotherapies are in nowadays against cancer. Let the body heal itself and all that.
But when we get regenerative therapies working, shit'll be cash.
What Science is best for killing everyone in my school?
>>8300820
The science of multiculturalism.
>>8300820
Learn to gas the entire school by accident with chemistry.
Sounds like a great idea! Sulfur Oxide? Chlorine? Red Phosphorus (g)? So many options!
Technology will come to the point where it will grant humans super powers, beyond our comprehension.
[citation needed]
>>8300699
Bioelectrogenesis for me.
through robotic limb attachments
if alive today, he would be the god of /sci/
>>8300692
you'd say the same thing about mochizuki if he were dead
>>8300697
>mochizuki
nope.jpg
onetrickpony.png
lol.fag
>>8300692
>poo in the loo
>god of anything on 4chan
top lel
what are you working on, biofags of /sci/ ?
I had a dream last night where I was developing a compound that breaks down crude oil in sea water. I later woke up and realized I was still unemployed.
>>8300733
breaks down or flocculates ?
because they already have the latter
>i had a dream where i was contracted to build the perfect catapult chair
>work is hard senpai
>upon finally completing it i found out my employer was going to use it to catapult babies into a giant river
microbio undergrad here, I was thinking of maybe working with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. I want to create mutants that can help clean up oil spills more efficiently.
thoughts?
Should a non math Olympian even bother getting into mathematical research?
>>8300573
https://terrytao.wordpress.com/career-advice/does-one-have-to-be-a-genius-to-do-maths/
>>8300589
I'd rather take the word of an ordinary human over a demigod.
>>8300573
not with that attitude man
olympians are smart people, but they're people too. work hard an catch up
>nothing can escape from black holes not even light because the gravity is so great!!!!!!11
>believing in the big bang (an extreme black hole which had more gravity than any other black hole, which exploded)
pick one and only one
You either believe in the big bang or black holes... can't have it both ways.
where does all the matter from the black holes go?
into a big bang
>>8300535
The big bang wasn't a black hole, so I can choose both.
>>8300535
gravity didn't exist during big bang
Well? Which one was better?
What have you done?
>>8300474
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SxcurY0Gp-0
>>8300479
What an idiot! Pluto isnt a planet
Does Moon have the same gravity as Earth?
>>8300464
Yes.
Its not so much something you have. Its a footprint and we are all stepping in the same space time.
Obviously.
I stopped caring about math when I was introduced to the concept of imaginary numbers. What a crock of shit. If your equation can only be solved by inventing numbers that can't exist, like some kind of math deity , then you are fucking wrong and the math is flawed. Same for algebra solutions that basically say "the correct answer is whatever the correct answer is". Thats what the math said transcribed to words but god forbid if i wrote in down in english instead of the ancient math runes the teacher word mark me wrong.
Math is logical and numbers never lie my ass. Math is just as flawed as any other human construct.
Okay.
an equation that normally has no solution can be made to have a solution that is useful.
if u had mentioned infinite sums then that'd be a different story
>>8300377
All math is an invention, conceivable numbers included. That is kind of the point and why it inst a scientist. But it certainly doesn't make it useless.
Do you think that internet is the logical result of any advanced enough civilization?
>>8300294
judging by your post, no
An endless source of information and expression, yet nothing but frogs and dick pics
It's just humanity 2016
>>8300294
the internet is still in it's wild west days, soon goverments and corporations will take over and it's gg