How do I become interested in physics?
fuck off, read book, do problems
Why do you want to be interested in physics?
>>8308660
give up anime for good
Currently a sophomore starting my aerospace engineering classes. I don't want to work as a military contractor, so should I rethink my major, or are there enough civilian aerospace jobs that I'll be fine?
pic unrelated
>>8308581
>I don't want to work as a military contractor
why? they have all the interesting shit
>>8308606
>why?
i'm a pacifist and don't want to make my living creating the means by which war is waged
>>8308609
gay
https://www.newscientist.com/article/2102970-mysterious-seti-signal-sends-alien-hunting-telescopes-scrambling/
>it's a scientists think some random noise is an alien signal episode
Correction, physicists being the autistic tinfoil wearers as they were decades ago.
>>8308562
No one actually thinks it's alien. It's probably a similar thing to the WoW! signal which was never repeated again. Probably some cosmic event. Some scientists working on this even suggest it may be Gravitational lensing where it is possible that a massive object like a star might have amplified a smaller signal from behind it...
If you believe in a fake thing really really really hard, does that make it slightly less fake?
>>8308550
Christians make up around 33% of the world's population
The best it can be is a fake thing with consequences.
Depends. There is such a thing as a self-fulfilling prophecy.
You talk so much about science, but what is science?
How does it differ from non-science? How does it differ from pseudoscience?
Define science and legitimize that definition.
Here are some terms that may help you in finding something to talk about:
>Vienna Circle, Logical Empiricism, description, theories, explication, problem of holism
problem of induction, Hume, radical skepticism of induction
>falsification, Karl Popper, time-proven, confirmation, evolution of theories
>statistics
>Thomas Kuhn, preparadigmatic science, paradigms, incommensurability, normal science, revolutionary science, crisis science, anomalies, puzzle-solving, paradigm-shift
>Lakatos, research programs, hard core, protective belt
>Laudan, growth of research traditions, acceptance vs. pursuit
>Feyerabend, Radical Pluralism, "everything goes"
>theories, descriptions, explanations, covering law, asymmetry problem, causation, Humeanism, unification, Friedman, Kitcher, Strevens, kairetic account, difference-making
>models
(That's everything I can come up with right now. Don't know anything about statistics and models.)
Anything else you can think of that's worth looking into?
>>8308503
you provided the best talking point of all at the bottom of your post, OP
>doesnt know anything about statistics or models
>wants to talk about what science is/is not
Very simply put it works like this:
Pick a field.
Pick a model pertaining to your selected field.
Does the model work?
If it works-
>Cool. Let's use it to figure shit out.
If it doesn't work-
>Okay. Let's figure out why and fix it.
Repeat.
>>8308503
Science - uses the scientific method to test hypotheses
Non-science - everything else
Will the Earth be kill if the ensuing relativistic jet is directed towards us?
>>8308495
>if the ensuing relativistic jet is directed towards us?
Betelgeuse's pole isn't pointed in our direction.
>ensuing relativistic jet
Relativistic jets come from active galactic nuclei, black holes and neutron stars. Not red giants.
Hypernovae produce powerful gamma ray bursts, perhaps that's what you're asking about?
Betelgeuse isn't a massive hypergiant, so it won't produce a gamma ray burst. It's a red supergiant, and will explode like your everyday supernova, a spherical explosion that will have dissipated into oblivion by the time the thin ass shell hits the solar system, if it ever does.
Betelgeuse will not cause us any harm. It'll be a pretty sight, brightness comparable to the full moon. It'll stay bright for a few weeks, maybe a month.
>>8308506
>Betelgeuse's pole isn't pointed in our direction.
How can you be so sure?
>>8308511
Did you not read the rest of my post? Even if it was pointed at us, literally nothing would happen.
Betelgeuse is large and close enough that you can actually directly image it and study its rotation and activity to determine where the poles are.
Are we lucky that C is as fast as it is?
>>8308416
C isn't fast.
>>8308416
C++ is faster
>>8308475
gold
>"it can be easily shown that..."
HURRR DUURR ITS SO LONG IT MUST BE HARD AND ONLY FOR GENIUSES
Go back to twatter you fucking retard.
>>8308361
>"...particle physicists have vomit for brains."
>"we will not insult the intelligence of our reader by providing a proof"
What's the scientific explanation for top female chess players being weaker than top males?
White/gray matter ratio
>>8308319
we are not equal. check out different belll curve distributions.
>>8308319
emotions get too much in the way the further you plan ahead.
/sci/
is it true (pic)?
is cortisol responsible for being degenerated looser virgin?
>autistic losers just got another thing to blame their failures on
great.
next up: free will can't exist in a probabilistic universe
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_will#Physics
discuss
Virgins now literally blaming mommy for never hugging them.
it's pretty garbage throughout
How long did it take you to learn LaTex /sci/?
>>8308225
8 years and still learning, m8
how do i learn this shit, any resources?
Is fourth dimensional stuff only math concepts or do you think there is an actual physical 4th direction in space we can't see.
>>8308214
Your mom
i think there are 10 spacial dimensions my man
What is time
What does /sci/ think about trying to solve difficult problems by subconsciousness /being in meditative relaxed state and just letting your brain(?) do all the hard work by itself just like Von Neumann. There was also another professor who almost fell asleep and solved a really difficult problem but can't remember his and in case I find it I'm going to post it.
>>8308201
Can you post some references? This is quite fascinating but /x/ could be better at this than /sci/. I'm into meditation now. First thing I want to improve is memory. You know when you experience crisp dreams? I'd like to do that during the day with real life material like textbooks. Anapanasati coupled with mindfulness during the day could be key to achieving good meditation sessions.
From:
Mathematical Apocrypha Redux: More Stories and Anecdotes of Mathematicians and the Mathematical (Spectrum)
by Steven Krantz.
Posted recently by another Anon.
At what point does a human being become "conscious"? Think of the phrase "I think, therefore I am", when exactly does this happen?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally%E2%80%93Anne_test
Perhaps, since you can then realize that you are your distinct "self", and that the other entities around you are their distinct "self".
However this is a very vague and philosophical topic, because the word "conscious" is a vague term.
> What was even the point of this
>>8308155
You are really misquoting Descartes there.
"I think Therefore I am" is actually to posit the metaphysical existence of ones self, not as a realization of ones consciousness
>>8308173
>Perhaps, since you can then realize that you are your distinct "self", and that the other entities around you are their distinct "self".
That's sense of self not consciousness.
Source: on shrooms you're still consciousness but you feel no distinction between yourself, others, or the universe at large.
[soiler]it's interesting because this implies that this feeling/perception (of distinctness), is a mere product of the mind -> it could be false. So too could then be our feelings and perceptions of consciousness.
There have been numerous experiments involving bugs to prove evolution on a micro level. This doesn't really prove evolution as we know it though.
What if we took a bunch of fruit flies (or a similar, even faster reproducing bug) and put them in a very resource starved environment but we put plenty of resources in a lake like watersource in that same environment.
When even a single fruit fly develops, somehow through pure chance, the ability to survive underwater and reproduce, evolution would be proved.
>>8308062
you'd have to wait a long time, famalam
>>8308070
"Female fruit flies are capable of laying hundreds of eggs within their brief life spans. Eggs are most commonly laid on moist, fermenting food masses such as overripe fruit and vegetables. Within 24 to 30 hours, fruit fly eggs hatch into larvae known as maggots. These maggots feed on the fruits within which they were laid.
Within one week, maggots burrow through the decaying matter and molt. After five to six days, larvae move to a dry surface and transform into pupae. A few days later, adult fruit flies emerge. Fruit flies become sexually active within two days of emerging as adults. Female fruit flies may mate with several males and store sperm for future use."
Lets just assume you have hundreds of thousands of fruit flies, that should be hundred of thousands of new life cycles every day.
>>8308062
fruitflys have been used to prove mutations are hereditary but what you are suggesting would take a very long time with extreme dedication just to find out its hazard to force evolution